HC Deb 10 April 1905 vol 144 cc1155-6

Motion made, and Question proposed, "That this House do now adjourn."—(Sir A. Acland-Hood.)

MR. DALZIEL (Kirkcaldy Burghs)

said that many hon. Members had remained in the belief that the Army Annual Bill was to be taken that evening. He thought that when the Government had changed their mind as to the arrangement of the business at the Evening Sitting information should be given to the House. He asked when the Government proposed to take the Army Annual Bill.

Railway Company Total Number. Total number used exclusively for shunting purposes. Number fitted with Power Brakes.
Engines. Tenders. Engines. Tenders. Engines. Tenders.
MR. McKENNA (Monmouthshire, N.)

said that there was a general understanding that the Army Annual Bill would be taken that night, and it was on that ground that arrangements had been made to discuss it. He did not suggest for a moment that the right hon. Gentleman had done anything to defeat those on that side of the House in their arrangements.

THE PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY (Sir A. ACLAND-HOOD, Somersetshire, Wellington)

said that as the Divisions on the Chancellor's Resolution went on till twenty minutes past twelve o'clock, and as it was agreed that the debate on the Army Annual Bill would go on for a considerable time, he thought it would be more convenient to take it on Wednesday at twelve midnight.

MR. DALZIEL

Does the right hon. Gentleman suppose that the Government are going to be on those benches at twelve midnight on Wednesday?