HC Deb 25 February 1904 vol 130 cc1064-107

Motion made, and Question proposed, "That a Supplementary sum, not exceeding £2,700,000, be granted to His Majesty, to defray the Charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1904, for Additional Expenditure in respect of the following Army Services, viz:—

Vote 1, Pay, &c, of the Army £2,000,000
Vote 6, Transport and Remounts £2,100,000
Vote 7, Provisions, Forage, and other Supplies £2,030,000
Total £6,130,000
Excess Appropriations in Aid (Votes 1, 6, 7, 9, and 10). £3,430,000
£2,700,000

MR. CHARLES HOBHOUSE

said he understood an Amendment had been moved to reduce the Vote by £100,000.

* THE CHAIRMAN

said an Amendment always dropped when progress was reported.

MR. CHARLES HOBHOUSE

said in that case he should move the reduction of the Vote by £10,000 in respect of the item for Land and Inland Water Transport Abroad.

Motion made, and Question proposed, "That Item, Vote 6, Sub-head B (Land and Inland Water Transport Abroad), be reduced by £10,000."—(Mr. Charles Hobhouse.)

MR. BROMLEY DAVENPORT

stated that he had already said everything he could say in regard to this Vote. He had endeavoured to explain why it was necessary for the Government to bring forward a Supplementary Estimate.

Original Question again proposed.

MR. FLYNN (Cork, N.)

said he was emboldened by the result of the last

Question put.

The Committee divided:—Ayes, 74; Noes, 88. (Division List No. 22.)

AYES.
Abraham, William (Cork, N.E.) Jones, William (Carnarvonshire) Power, Patrick Joseph
Barry, E. (Cork, S.) Joyce, Michael Rea, Russell
Bayley, Thomas (Derbyshire) Kilbride, Denis Redmond, John E. (Waterford)
Brigg, John Labonchere, Henry Redmond, William (Clare)
Broadhurst, Henry Layland-Barratt, Francis Roberts, John Bryn (Eifion)
Buchanan, Thomas Ryburn Leese, Sir Jos. F. (Accrington) Roche, John
Caldwell, James Lewis, John Herbert Rose, Charles Day
Campbell, John (Armagh, S.) Lundon, W. Runciman, Walter
Condon, Thomas Joseph MacVeagh, Jeremiah Sheehan, Daniel Daniel
Crean, Eugene M'Hugh, Patrick A. Sheehy, David
Crombie, John William M'Laren, Sir Charles Benjamin Shipman, Dr. John G.
Devlin, Chas. Ramsay (Galway) Mansfield, Horace Rendall Sinclair, John (Forfarshire)
Devlin, Joseph (Kilkenny, N.) Mooney, John J. Spencer, Rt. Hn. C. R (Northants
Dilke, Rt. Hon. Sir Charles Murphy, John Stevenson, Francis S.
Donelan, Captain A. Nannetti, Joseph P. Sullivan, Donal
Doogan, P. C. Nolan, Joseph (Louth South) Thomas, Sir A. (Glamorgan, E.
Fenwick, Charles O'Brien, Patrick (Kilkenny) Thomas, D. Alfred (Merthyr)
Ferguson, R. C. Munro (Leith) O' Brien, P. J. (Tipperary, N.) Wason, Eugene (Clackmannan)
Fitzmaurice, Lord Edmond O'Connor, James (Wicklow, W.) Wason, Jn. Cathcart (Orkney)
Flavin, Michael Joseph O'Donnell, John (Mayo, S.) White, Luke (York, E. R.)
Flynn, James Christopher O'Donnell, T. (Kerry, W.) Wilson, John (Durham, Mid.)
Freeman-Thomas, Captain F. O'Dowd, John Yoxall, James Henry
Fuller, J. M. F. O'Kelly, Jas. (Roscommon, N.)
Gilhooly, James O'Mara, James TELLERS FOR THE AYES—Mr. Charles Hobhouse and Mr. Whitley.
Goddard, Daniel Ford O'Shaughnessy, P. J.
Johnson, John (Gateshead) Perks, Robert William
NOES.
Anson, Sir William Reynell Goulding, Edward Alfred Pym, C. Guy
Arnold-Forster, Rt. Hn. Hugh O. Harris, Dr. Fredk. R. (Dulwich) Rasch, Sir Frederic Carne
Atkinson, Rt. Hon. John Haslett, Sir James Horner Reid, James (Greenock)
Balcarres, Lord Heath, A. Howard (Hanley) Richards, Henry Charles
Balfour, Kenneth R. (Christch.) Heath, James (Staffords., N.W.) Ropner, Colonel Sir Robert
Bartley, Sir George C. T. Hickman, Sir Alfred Rutherford, W. W. (Liverpool)
Beach, Rt. Hn. Sir Mich. Hicks Hoare, Sir Samuel Scott, Sir S. (Marylebone, W.)
Bignold, Arthur Hunt, Rowland Sharpe, William Edward T.
Bigwood, James Kennaway, Rt. Hn. Sir John H. Sloan, Thomas Henry
Brodrick, Rt. Hon. St. John Kerr, John Smith, H. C (North'mbTyneside)
Bull, William James Lawrence, Wm. F. (Liverpool) Spear, John Ward
Butcher, John George Lawson, Jn. G. (Yorks., N. R.) Stanley, Hn. Arthur (Ormskirk)
Cayzer, Sir Charles William Lees, Sir Elliott (Birkenhead) Stanley, Rt. Hon. Lord (Lancs.)
Chamberlain, Rt. Hn. J.A(Worc) Legge, Col. Hon. Heneage Stock, James Henry
Cochrane, Hon. Thos. H. A. E. Llewellyn, Evan Henry Stroyan, John
Coghill, Douglas Harry Long, Col. Chas. W. (Evesham) Taylor, Austin (East Toxteth)
Cook, Sir Frederick Lucas Long, Rt. Hon. W. (Bristol, S.) Thornton, Percy M.
Crossley, Rt. Hon. Sir Savile Lonsdale, John Brownlee Tomlinson, Sir Wm. Edw. M.
Davenport, William Bromley Lucas, Col. Francis (Lowestoft) Tuff, Charles
Denny, Colonel Macdona, John Cumming Valentia, Viscount
Dickson, Charles Scott M'Killop, James (Stirlingshire) Walrond, Rt. Hn. Sir William H.
Digby, John K. D. Wingfield- Milvain, Thomas Warde, Colonel C. E.
Douglas, Rt. Hon. A. Akers- Morrell, George Herbert Whiteley, H. (Ashton und. Lyne)
Doxford, Sir William Theodore Murray, Charles J. (Coventry) Wilson, A. Stanley (York, E.R.
Durning-Lawrence, Sir Edwin Murray, Col. Wyndham (Bath) Wilson, John (Glasgow)
Finch, Rt. Hon. George H. Newdegate, Francis A. N. Wylie, Alexander
Finlay, Sir Robert Bannatyne Nicholson, William Graham
Fitzroy, Hn. Edward Algernon Percy, Earl TELLERS FOR THE NOES—Sir Alexander Acland-Hood and Mr. Ailwyn Fellowes.
Forster, Henry William Plummer, Walter R.
Gardner, Ernest Powell, Sir Francis Sharp
Gorst, Rt. Hon. Sir John Eldon Pretyman, Ernest George

division and from a sense of duty to continue the examination of the Estimates now before the Committee. He hoped that on every possible occasion hon. Members would by their votes mark their protest against the recklessness and improvidence of the expenditure indicated by the present Estimates. He remembered when a Supplementary Estimate was a most unusual thing, but now almost every item of the original Estimates was exceeded. Why was such a large sum as £60,000 required for Sea Transport in time of peace? What was the charter price of the vessels, what was the number of men, and what was the quantity of material conveyed? The Financial Secretary to the War Office had admitted that he could not explain these things because he was new to the office he held. Child as the hon. Gentleman was in these matters, he hoped he would be able to give the Committee a satisfactory explanation why such a large sum was required in addition to the original Estimate. These excess charges were occurring in almost every branch of the service, and when Supplementary Estimates were presented the Government carried them by an automatic majority of Members who flocked in from the smoking room when the divisions were called. He moved to reduce the Vote by £10,000.

Motion made, and Question proposed. "That Item. Vote 6, Sub-head C (Sea Transport), be reduced by £10,000."—(Mr. Flynn.)

MR. AUSTIN TAYLOR (Liverpool, E. Toxteth)

said he could not agree with the hon. Member that £60,000 was a large amount for Sea Transport, having regard to the conditions of sea transport. He could understand that this amount might be justified. At the same time he was willing to admit that sea transport was a subject that lent itself to an infinite variety of treatment. It would

have been very much better if the item had been more accurately described, and if the countries from which the transport was carried out had been specified on the Estimate. He asked the Financial Secretary to state from what portion of the British Empire the sea transport took place, because, unless the Committee got some particular information, it was evident that they might occupy the whole evening discussing the places from which sea transport might take place. Between what ports did the steamers sail, and at what prices were they chartered. He should like to lay considerable emphasis on that point. He wished especially to know at what rates the vessels were chartered seeing that the freight market was in a more or less depressed condition at the present moment. If no satisfactory information on these points was forthcoming, the words "Sea Transport" lent themselves to great prolixity.

MR. BROMLEY DAVENPORT

said he was very glad to be able to satisfy his hon. friend. All the sea transport was from South Africa. The Supplementary Estimate became necessary because, as he had already explained, the moving home of a number of troops had been deferred to a later period than was originally intended.

MR. AUSTIN TAYLOR

Can my hon. friend give the rate per net or gross registered tonnage?

MR. BROMLEY DAVENPORT

I am sorry I cannot.

Question put.

The Committee divided:—Ayes, 85;. Noes, 114. (Division List No. 23.)

AYES.
Abraham, William (Cork, N.E.) Condon, Thomas Joseph Foster, Sir Walter (Derby Co.)
Barry, E. (Cork, S.) Crean, Eugene Freeman-Thomas. Captain F.
Bayley, Thomas (Derbyshire) Crombie, John William Fuller, J. M. F.
Bell, Richard Davies, M. Vaughan-(Cardigan) Gilhooly, James
Boland, John Devlin, Chas. Ramsay (Galway) Goddard, Daniel Ford
Brigg, John Devlin, Joseph (Kilkenny, N.) Hayden, John Patrick
Broadhurst, Henry Donelan, Captain A. Hemphill, Rt. Hon. Charles H.
Buchanan, Thomas Ryburn Doogan, P. C. Johnson, John (Gateshead)
Buxton, Sydney Charles Fenwick, Charles Jones, William (Carnarvonshire)
Caldwell, James Ferguson, R. C. Munro (Leith) Joyce. Michael
Campbell, John (Armagh, S.) Fitzmaurice, Lord Edmond Kilbride, Denis
Campbell- Bannerman, Sir H. Flavin, Michael Joseph Labouchere, Henry
Layland-Barratt, Francis O' Kelly, Jas. (Roscommon, N.) Sullivan. Donal
Leese, Sir Jos. F. (Accrington) O' Mara, James Thomas, Abel (Carmarthen, E.)
Lewis, John Herbert Perks, Robert William Thomas, Sir A. (Glamorgan, E.
Lundon, W. Power, Patrick Joseph Thomas, D. Alfred (Merthyr)
MacVeagh, Jeremiah Rea, Russell Toulmin, George
M'Hugh, Patrick A. Reddy, M. Trevelyan, Charles Philips
M'Laren, Sir Charles Benjamin Redmond, John E. (Waterford) Wason, Eugene (Clackmannan)
Mansfield Horace Kendall Redmond, William (Clare) Wason, Jn. Cathcart (Orkney)
Mooney, John J. Roberts, John Bryn (Eifion) White, Luke (York, E. R.)
Murphy, John Roche, John Whitley, J. H. (Halifax)
Nannetti, Joseph P. Rose, Charles Day Wilson, John (Durham, Mid.)
Nolan, Joseph (Louth, South) Runciman, Walter Wilson, John (Falkirk)
O'Brien, Patrick (Kilkenny) Sheehan, Daniel Daniel Yoxall, James Henry
O'Brien, P. J. (Tipperary, N.) Sheehy, David
O'Connor, James (Wicklow, W.) Shipman, Dr. John G. TELLERS FOR THE AYES—Mr. Flynn and Mr. Charles Hobhouse.
O'Donnell, John (Mayo. S.) Sinclair, John (Forfarshire)
O' Donnell, T. (Kerry. W.) Slack, John Bamford
O'Dowd, John Spencer, Rt. Hn. C. R. (Northants)
NOES.
Anson, Sir William Reynell Goulding, Edward Alfred Pretyman, Ernest George
Arnold-Forster, Rt. Hn. Hugh O. Groves, James Grimble Pym, C. Guy.
Atkinson, Rt. Hon. John Hamilton, Marq. of (L'nd'nderry) Rasch, Sir Frederic Carne
Bain, Colonel James Robert Harris, F. Leverton (Tynem'th) Ratcliff, R. F.
Baird, John George Alexander Harris, Dr. Fredk. R. (Dulwich) Reid, James (Greenock)
Balcarres, Lord Haslett, Sir James Horner Richards, Henry Charles
Balfour, Rt. Hon. G. W. (Leeds) Heath, A. Howard (Hanley) Robertson, Herbert (Hackney)
Balfour, Kenneth R. (Christch. Heath, James (Stafford., N. W.) Ropner, Colonel Sir Robert
Banbury, Sir Frederick George Hickman, Sir Alfred Rutherford, W. W. (Liverpool)
Bartley, Sir George C. T. Hoare, Sir Samuel Sackville, Col. S. G. Stopford-
Beach, Rt. Hn. Sir Mich. Hicks Howard, J. (Kent. Faversham) Scott, Sir S. (Marylebone, W.)
Bignold, Arthur Hunt, Rowland Sharpe, William Edward T.
Bigwood, James Kennaway, Rt. Hn. Sir John H. Sloan, Thomas Henry
Brodrick, Rt. Hon. St. John Kerr, John Smith, H.C. (North'mb'Pyneside)
Bull, William James Law, Andrew Bonar (Glasgow) Spear, John Ward
Butcher, John George Lawrence, Wm. F. (Liverpool) Stanley, Hn. Arthur (Ormskirk)
Carson, Rt. Hon. Sir Edw. H. Lawson, Jn. G. (Yorks., N.R.) Stanley, Rt. Hon. Lord (Lancs.)
Cavendish, V.C.W. (Derbyshire) Lees, Sir Elliott (Birkenhead) Stock, James Henry
Cayzer, Sir Charles William Legge, Col. Hon. Heneage Stroyan, John
Chamberlain, Rt. Hn. J. A (Wore) Llewellyn, Evan Henry Strutt, Hon. Charles Hedley
Clive, Captain Percy A. Long, Col. Chas. W. (Evesham) Taylor, Austin (East Toxteth)
Cochrane, Hon. Thos. H. A. E. Long, Rt. Hon. W. (Bristol, S.) Thornton, Percy M.
Coghill, Douglas Harry Lonsdale, John Brownlee Tomlinson, Sir Wm. Edw. M.
Cook, Sir Frederick Lucas Lucas, Col. Francis (Lowestoft) Tuff, Charles
Crossley, Rt. Hon. Sir Savile Lyttelton, Rt. Hon. Alfred Valentia, Viscount
Dalkeith, Earl of Macdona, John Cumming Vincent, Sir Edgar (Exeter)
Davenport, William Bromley Maconochie, A. W. Walker, Col. William Hall
Denny, Colonel M'Killop, James (Stirlingshire) Walrond, Rt. Hn. Sir William H.
Dickson, Charles Scott Milvain, Thomas Warde, Colonel C. E.
Digby, John K. D. Wingfield- Morgan, D. J. (Walthamstow) Whiteley, H. (Ashton und. Lyne)
Douglas, Rt. Hon. A. Akers- Morrell, George Herbert Wilson, A. Stanley (York, E.R.
Doxford, Sir William Theodore Murray, Rt. Hon. A. G. (Bute) Wilson, John (Glasgow)
Durning-Lawrence, Sir Edwin Murray, Charles J. (Coventry) Wylie, Alexander
Finch, Rt. Hon. George H. Murray, Col. Wyndham (Bath) Wyndham-Quin, Major W. H.
Finlay Sir Robert Bannatyne Newdegate, Francis A.N.
Fitzroy, Hn. Edward Algernon Nicholson, William Graham TELLERS FOR THE NOES—Sir Alexander Acland-Hood
Forster, Henry William Pease, Herbt. Pike (Darlington)
Galloway, William Johnson Percy, Earl and Mr. Ailwyn Fellowes.
Gardner, Ernest Plummer, Walter R.
Gorst, Rt. Hon. Sir John Eldon Powell, Sir Francis Sharp

Original Question again proposed.

MR. FLYNN

said that they had got no account whatever from the Secretary for War as to whether this Vote included the cost of the expedition to Tibet.

* THE CHAIRMAN

Order, order! This is a Vote for the China Expeditionary Force alone.

MR. FLYNN

said he intended to give a geographical account of Tibet, but, of course, he would not go on that line of route if it was irrelevant. What he wanted to know was the reason for the enormous discrepancy between the original Estimate and the present one. The Committee was entitled to a full and satisfactory explanation from the Secretary of State for War or from the Financial Secretary to the War Office. He begged to move the reduction of the Vote by £10,000.

Motion made, and Question proposed, "That Item, Vote 6, Sub-head E (China Expeditionary Force, Transport and Remounts), be reduced by £10,000."—(Mr. Flynn.)

MR. O'MARA

said that, in seconding the Motion, he wished to express his amazement at the carelessness with which this Estimate had been drawn up. Instead of the Estimates being introduced in a proper and businesslike way, they were asked to vote in a hurried way, with the closure applied, these large sums. That was reducing the control of the House of Commons over expenditure to a farce. Under Appropriation in aid, under the same Sub-head, there was an item, "Proceeds of sale of horses, and other cast animals, £1,000,000." Had these accounts come in yet? The War Office must really know how much the rubbish of this Expedition had realised. Had it realised exactly £1,000,000?

* THE CHAIRMAN

said that the Appropriation in aid did not arise on this item. It had nothing to do with the China Expeditionary Force. The deduction referred to by the hon. Member did not come under Sub-head E, but Subhead G, of the Appropriation Vote. The misprint of E for G was obvious.

MR. O'MARA

said that the Committee were not responsible for the printing of the Estimates. It was a monstrous way to put the business of the country before the House, because it led to great misunderstanding. The consideration of these Estimates ought to be postponed to allow the War Office to put a proper Paper before hon. Members. A Department which had the spending of £30,000,000, or £40,000,000 surely ought to have a clerk to read the proofs of the Papers before they were submitted to the House. It was scandalous the way in which information was given to the Committee, and the manner in which these different items were mixed up was another proof of the utter inefficiency of the War Office.

Mr. JOSEPH DEVLIN (Kilkenny, N.) moved, "That the Chairman do report Progress, and ask leave to sit again;" but the CHAIRMAN, being of opinion that the Motion was an abuse of the Rules of the House, declined to propose the Question thereupon to the Committee.

Question again proposed, "That Item, Vote 6, Sub-head E (China Expeditionary Force, Transport and Remounts), be reduced by £10,000."

MR. MACVEAGH (Down, S.)

asked if it was open to move the Adjournment in order to give hon. Members an opportunity to see a correct Paper?

* THE CHAIRMAN

It is also open to the Chair to refuse to accept such a Motion.

MR. O'MARA

asked, on a point of order, how they could continue the debate on an incorrect Paper.

* THE CHAIRMAN

said that the mistake did not signify, and the hon. Member was not misled. He would not be entitled to refer to the Appropriation in aid when the China Expeditionary Force was under discussion.

MR. CHARLES DEVLIN

said that the Supplementary Estimate was double the original, so that evidently the latter was absolutely misleading. Who made out the Estimates? Was it the Minister in charge of the Department, or was it some official? They noticed that as one Minister went out a new Minister came in, and, if all reports were true, there was seemingly no difficulty at all about that in view of the number of applications to fill the position. What he would like to know was, how and where this money was spent? Were the troops employed in China all British; were they white troops, for after all the declared and avowed policy of the Government was Imperialistic? They declared chat they were the pillars of the Empire; that they held up the Empire; and that they hoped to bring the Colonies together. In bringing troops to China, did they bring all British troops?

* THE CHAIRMAN

said that that had nothing whatever to do with the Vote; and he invited the hon. Gentleman to give his attention to the question under discussion.

MR. CHARLES DEVLIN

said he was discussing the transport of troops to

China; perhaps he was wrong in doing that, and he might be right if he would take up the next question—that of remounts. Where were these remounts bought, and what was the price paid for them?

Mr. Secretary ARNOLD-FORSTER

rose in his place, and claimed to move, "That the Question be now put,"

Question put, "That the Question be now put."

The Committee divided:—Ayes, 137; Noes, 98. (Division List No. 24.)

AYES.
Agnew, Sir Andrew Noel Hamilton, Marq of (L'nd'nderry) Percy, Earl
Anson, Sir William Reynell Harris, F. Leverton (Tynetn'th) Pilkington, Colonel Richard
Arnold-Forster, Rt. Hn. Hugh O. Harris, Dr. Fredk. R. (Dulwich) Plummer, Walter R.
Atkinson, Rt. Hon. John Haslett, Sir James Horner Powell, Sir Francis Sharp
Bain, Colonel James Robert Heath, A. Howard (Hanley) Pretyman, Ernest George
Baird, John George Alexander Heath, James (Staffords., N.W.) Pym, C. Guy
Balcarres, Lord Henderson, Sir A. (Stafford. W.) Rasch, Sir Frederic Carne
Balfour, Rt. Hon. G. W. (Leeds) Hickman, Sir Alfred Ratcliff, R. F.
Balfour, Kenneth R. (Chrstch.) Hoare, Sir Samuel Reid, James (Greenock)
Banbury, Sir Frederick George Hogg, Lindsay Richards, Henry Charles
Bartley, Sir George C. T. Hoult, Joseph Robertson, Herbert (Hackney)
Beach, Rt. Hn. Sir Mich. Hicks Houston, Robert Paterson Ropner, Colonel Sir Robert
Bignold, Arthur Howard, J. (Kent, Favershain) Rutherford, W. W. (Liverpool)
Bigwood, James Hunt, Rowland Sackville, Col. S. G. Stopford-
Blundell, Colonel Henry Kennaway, Rt. Hn. Sir John H. Sadler, Col. Samuel Alexander
Brodrick, Rt. Hon. St. John Kerr, John Sharpe, William Edward T.
Bull, William James Law, Andrew Bonar (Glasgow) Sloan, Thomas Henry
Butcher, John George Lawrence, Sir Jos. (Monmouth) Smith Abel H. (Hertford, East)
Carson, Rt. Hon. Sir Edw. H. Lawrence, Wm. F. (Liverpool) Smith, H. C. (North'mb Tyneside)
Cavendish, V.C.W. (Derbyshire) Lawson, Jn. G. (Yorks., N. R.) Spear, John Ward
Cayzer, Sir Charles William Lee, A. H. (Hants., Fareham) Stanley, Hn. Arthur (Ormskirk)
Chamberlain, Rt. Hn. J.A (Worc Lees, Sir Elliott (Birkenhead) Stanley, Rt. Hon. Lord (Lancs.)
Clive, Captain Percy A. Legge, Col. Hon. Heneage Stock, James Henry
Cochrane, Hon. Thos. H. A. E. Leveson-Gower, Frederick N.S. Stroyan, John
Coghill, Douglas Harry Llewellyn, Evan Henry Strutt, Hon. Charles Hedley
Compton, Lord Alwyne Long, Col. Chas. W. (Evesham) Taylor, Austin (East Toxteth)
Cook, Sir Frederick Lucas Long, Rt. Hon. W. (Bristol, S.) Thornton, Percy M.
Crossley, Rt. Hon. Sir Savile Lonsdale, John Brownlee Tomlinson, Sir Wm. Edw. M.
Dalkeith Earl of Lucas, Col. Francis (Lowestoft) Tuff, Charles
Dalrymple, Sir Charles Lyttelton, Rt Hon. Alfred Valentia, Viscount
Davenport, William Bromley Macdona, John Cumming Vincent, Sir Edgar (Exeter)
Denny, Colonel Maconochie, A.W. Walker, Col. William Hall
Dickson, Charles Scott M'Arthur, Charles (Liverpool) Walrond, Rt. Hn. Sir William H.
Digby John K. D. Wingfield- M'Killop, James (Stirlingshire) Warde, Colonel C. E.
Douglas, Rt. Hon. A. Akers- Maxwell, W.J.H. (Dumfriesshr Whiteley, H. (Ashton und. Lyne)
Doxford, Sir William Theodore Milner, Rt. Hn. Sir Frederick G. Willox, Sir John Archibald
Durning-Lawrence, Sir Edwin Milvain, Thomas Wilson, A. Stanley (York, E.R.
Elliot, Hon. A. Ralph Douglas Montagu, G. (Huntingdon) Wilson, John (Glasgow)
Finch, Rt Hon. George H. Morgan, D. J. (Walthamstow) Wilson-Todd, Sir W. H. (Yorks.)
Finlay, Sir Robert Bannatyne Morrell, George Herbert Wodehouse, Rt. Hn. E. R. (Bath)
Fitzroy, Hn. Edward Algernon Morton, Arthur H. Aylmer Wortley, Rt. Hn. C. B. Stuart-
Flaunery, Sir Fortescue Murray, Rt. Hon. A. G. (Bute) Wylie, Alexander
Forster, Henry William Murray, Charles J. (Coventry) Wyndham-Quin, Major W. H.
Galloway, William Johnson Murray, Col. Wyndham (Bath)
Gardner, Ernest Newdegate, Francis A. N. TELLERS FOR THE AYES—Sir Alexander Acland-Hood
Goulding, Edward Alfred Nicholson, William Graham
Groves, James Grimble Pease, Herbt. Pike (Darlington) and Mr. Ailwyn Fellowes.
NOES.
Abraham, William (Cork, N.E.) Hayter, Rt. Hon. Sir Arthur D. Reckitt, Harold James
Barry, E. (Cork, S.) Hemphill, Rt. Hon. Charles H. Reddy, M.
Bayley, Thomas (Derbyshire) Hobhouse, C. E. H. (Bristol, E.) Redmond, John E. (Waterford)
Bell, Richard Johnson, John (Gateshead) Redmond, William (Clare)
Boland, John Jones, William (Carnarvonshire) Roberts, John Bryn (Eifion)
Brigg, John Joyce, Michael Roche, John
Broadhurst, Henry Kilbride, Denis Rose, Chares Day
Buchanan, Thomas Ryburn Labouchere, Henry Runciman, Walter
Burke, E. Haviland- Layland- Barratt, Francis Samuel, Herbert L.(Cleveland)
Buxton, Sydney Charles Leese, Sir Jos. F. (Accrington) Samuel, S. M. (Whitechapel)
Caldwell, James Leng, Sir John Sheehan, Daniel Daniel
Campbell, John (Armagh, S.) Lewis, John Herbert Sheehy, David
Campbell-Bannerman, Sir H. Lundon, W. Shipman, Dr. John G.
Condon, Thomas Joseph MacVeagh, Jeremiah Sinclair, John (Forfarshire)
Crean, Eugene M'Hugh, Patrick A. Slack, John Bamford
Crombie, John William M'Kean, John Spencer, Rt. Hn. C. R. (Northants)
Davies, M. Vaughan-(Cardigan) M'Laren, Sir Charles Benjamin Stevenson, Francis S.
Devlin, Chas. Ramsay (Galway) Mansfield, Horace Rendall Sullivan, Donal
Devlin, Joseph (Kilkenny, N.) Mooney, John J. Thomas, Abel (Carmarthen, E.)
Doogan, P. C. Murphy, John Thomas, Sir A. (Glamorgan, E.
Douglas, Charles M. (Lanark) Nannetti, Joseph P. Thomas, D. Alfred (Merthyr)
Fenwick, Charles Nolan, Joseph (Louth, South) Toulmin, George
Ferguson, R. C. Munro (Leith) O'Brien, P. J. (Tipperary, N.) Trevelyan, Charles Philips
Fitzmaurice, Lord Edmond O'Connor, James (Wicklow, W.) Wason, Eugene (Clackmannan)
Flavin, Michael Joseph O'Donnell, John (Mayo, S.) Wason, Jn. Cathcart (Orkney)
Flynn, James Christopher O'Donnell, T. (Kerry, W.) White, Luke (York. E. R.)
Foster, Sir Walter (Derby Co.) O'Dowd, John Whitley, J. H. (Halifax)
Fowler, Rt. Hon. Sir Henry O'Kelly, Jas. (Roscommon, N.) Wilson, John (Durham, Mid.)
Freeman-Thomas, Captain F. O'Mara, James Wilson, John (Falkirk)
Fuller, J. M. F. O'Shaughnessy, P. J. Yoxall, James Henry
Gilhooly, James Perks, Robert William
Gladstone, Rt. Hn. Herb. John Pirie, Duncan V. TELLERS FOR THE NOES—Captain Donelan and Mr. Patrick O'Brien.
Goddard, Daniel Ford Power, Patrick Joseph
Hayden, John Patrick Rea, Russell

Question put accordingly.

The Committee divided:—Ayes, 104; Noes, 150. (Division List No. 25.)

AYES.
Abraham, William (Cork, N.E.) Fowler, Rt. Hon. Sir Henry Nolan, Joseph (Louth, South)
Barry, E. (Cork, S.) Freeman-Thomas, Captain F. O'Brien, P. J. (Tipperary, N.)
Bayley, Thomas (Derbyshire) Fuller, J. M. F. O'Connor, James (Wicklow, W.)
Bell, Richard Gilhooly, James O'Donnell, John (Mayo, S.)
Boland, John Gladstone, Rt. Hn. Herb. John O' Donnell, T. (Kerry, W.)
Brigg, John Goddard, Daniel Ford O' Dowd, John
Broadhurst, Henry Hayden, John Patrick O' Kelly, Jas. (Roscommon, N.)
Buchanan, Thomas Ryburn Hayter, Rt. Hon. Sir Arthur D. O'Mara, James
Burke, E. Haviland- Hemphill, Rt. Hon. Charles H. O'Shaughnessy, P. J.
Buxton, Sydney Charles Hobhouse, C. E. H. (Bristol, E.) Perks, Robert William
Caldwell, James Johnson, John (Gateshead) Pirie, Duncan V.
Campbell, John (Armagh, S.) Jones, William (Carnarvonshire Power, Patrick Joseph
Campbell, Bannerman, Sir H. Joyce, Michael Rea, Russell
Condon, Thomas Joseph Kilbride, Denis Reckett, Harold James
Crean, Eugene Labouchere, Henry Reddy, M.
Crombie, John William Layland-Barratt, Francis Redmond, John E. (Waterford)
Davies, Alfred (Carmarthen) Leese, Sir Jos. F. (Accrington) Redmond, William (Clare)
Davies, M. Vaughan-(Cardigan) Leng, Sir John Rickett, J. Compton
Devlin, Chas. Ramsay (Galway) Lewis, John Herbert Roberts, John Bryn (Eifion)
Devlin, Joseph (Kilkenny, N.) Lundon, W. Roche, John
Doogan, P. C. MacVeagh, Jeremiah Rose, Charles Day
Douglas, Charles M. (Lanark) M'Hugh, Patrick A. Runciman, Walter
Evans, Samuel T. (Glamorgan) M'Kean, John Samuel, Herbert L. (Cleveland)
Fenwick, Charles M'Laren, Sir Charles Benjamin Samuel, S. M. (Whitechapel)
Ferguson, R. C. Munro (Leith) Mansfield Horace Rendall Sheehan, Daniel Daniel
Fitzmaurice, Lord Edmond Mooney, John J. Sheehy, David
Flavin, Michael Joseph Morgan, J. Lloyd (Carmarthen) Shipman, Dr. John G.
Flynn, James Christopher Murphy, John Sinclair, John (Forfarshire)
Foster, Sir Walter (Derby Co.) Nannetti, Joseph P. Slack, John Bamford
Spencer, Rt. Hn. C. R. (Northants) Toulmin, George Wilson, John (Durham, Mid.)
Stevenson, Francis S. Trevelyan, Charles Philips Wilson, John (Falkirk)
Sullivan, Donal Wason, Eugene (Clackmannan) Yoxall, James Henry
Thomas, Abel (Carmarthen, E. Wason, Jn. Cathcart (Orkney)
Thomas, Sir A. (Glamorgan, E. White, Luke (York, E. R.) TELLERS FOR THE AYES—Captain Donelan and Mr. Patrick O'Brien.
Thomas, D. Alfred (Merthyr) Whiteley, George (York, W.R.)
Tomkinson, James Whitley, J. H. (Halifax)
NOES.
Agnew, Sir Andrew Noel Hamilton, Marq of (L'nd'nderry) Percy, Earl
Anson, Sir William Reynell Harris, F. Leverton (Tynem'th) Pilkington, Colonel Richard
Arnold-Forster, Rt. Hn. Hugh O. Harris, Dr. Fredk. R. (Dulwich) Plummer, Walter R.
Atkinson, Rt. Hon. John Haslam, Sir Alfred S. Powell, Sir Francis Sharp
Bain, Colonel James Robert Haslett, Sir James Horner Pretyman, Ernest George
Baird, John George Alexander Heath, A. Howard (Hanley) Pryce-Jones, Lt.-Col. Edward
Balcarres, Lord Heath, James (Staffords., N.W.) Pym, C. Guy
Balfour, Rt. Hon. B. W. (Leeds) Henderson, Sir A. (Stafford, W. Rasch, Sir Frederic Carne
Balfour, Kenneth R. (Christch.) Hickman, Sir Alfred Ratcliff, R. F.
Banbury, Sir Frederick George Hoare, Sir Samuel Reid, James (Greenock)
Bartley, Sir George C. T. Hogg, Lindsay Remnant, James Farquharson
Beach, Rt. Hn. Sir Mich. Hicks Hoult, Joseph Richards, Henry Charles
Bignold, Arthur Houston, Robert Paterson Robertson, Herbert (Hackney)
Bigwood, James Howard, J. (Kent, Faversham) Ropner, Colonel Sir Robert
Blundell, Colonel Henry Hozier, Hn. James Henry Cecil Rutherford, W. W. (Liverpool)
Brodrick, Rt. Hon. St. John Hunt, Rowland Sackville, Col. S. G. Stopford-
Bull, William James Kennaway, Rt. Hn. Sir John H. Sadler, Col. Samuel Alexander
Butcher, John George Kerr, John Sharpe, William Edward T.
Carson, Rt. Hon. Sir Edw. H. Law, Andrew Bonar (Glasgow) Sloan, Thomas Henry
Cavendish, V.C.W. (Derbyshire Lawrence, Sir Jos. (Monmouth) Smith, Abel H. (Hertford, East)
Cayzer, Sir Charles William Lawrence, Wm. P. (Liverpool) Smith, H.C. (North'mb Tyneside)
Chamberlain, Rt. Hn. J. A (Worc) Lawson, Jn. G. (Yorks, N.R.) Spear, John Ward
Clive, Captain Percy A. Lee, A H. (Hants. Fareham) Stanley, Hn. Arthur (Ormskirk
Cochrane, Hon. Thos. H. A. E. Lees, Sir Elliott (Birkenhead) Stanley, Rt. Hon. Lord (Lancs.)
Coghill, Douglas Harry Legge, Col. Hon. Heneage Stock, James Henry
Colston, Chas. Edw. H. Athole Leveson-Gower, Frederick N.S. Stroyan, John
Compton, Lord Alwyne Llewellyn, Evan Henry Strutt, Hon. Charles Hedley
Cook, Sir Frederick Lucas Long, Col. Charles W.(Evesham Taylor, Austin (East Toxteth)
Crossley, Rt. Hon. Sir Savile Long, Rt. Hon. W. (Bristol S.) Thornton, Percy M.
Dalkeith, Earl of Lonsdale, John Brownlee Tomlinson, Sir Wm. Ed. M.
Dalrymple, Sir Charles Lucas, Col. Francis (Lowestoft) Tuff, Charles
Davenport, William Bromley Lucas, Reginald J.(Portsmouth) Valentia, Viscount
Denny, Colonel Lyttelton, Rt. Hon. Alfred Vincent, Sir Edgar (Exeter)
Dickson, Charles Scott Macdona, John Gumming Walker, Col. William Hall
Digby, John K. D. Wingfield- Maconochie, A. W. Walrond, Rt. Hn. Sir William H.
Douglas, Rt. Hon. A Akers- M'Arthur, Charles (Liverpool) Warde, Colonel C. E.
Doxford, Sir William Theodore M'Killop, James (Stirlingshire) Whiteley, H.(Ashton und. Lyne)
Durning-Lawrence, Sir Edwin Manners, Lord Cecil Willox, Sir John Archibald
Dyke, Rt. Hn. Sir William Hart Maxwell, W.J.H. (Dumfriessh.) Wilson, A. Stanley (York, E.R.
Elliot, Hon. A. Ralph Douglas Milner, Rt Hn. Sir Frederick G. Wilson, John (Glasgow)
Faber, George Denison (York) Milvain, Thomas Wilson-Todd, Sir W. H.(Yorks.)
Finch, Rt. Hon. George H. Montagu G. (Huntingdon) Wodehouse, Rt. Hn. E. R.(Bath)
Finlay, Sir Robert Bannatyne Morgan, D. J. (Walthamstow) Worthy, Rt. Hon. C. B. Stuart
Fitzroy, Hn. Edward Algernon Morrell, George Herbert Wylie, Alexander
Flannery, Sir Fortescue Morton, Arthur H. Aylmer Wyndham, Rt. Hon. George
Forster, Henry William Murray, Rt. Hon. A. G. (Bute) Wyndham-Quin, Major, W. H.
Galloway, William Johnson Murray, Charles J. (Coventry)
Gardner, Ernest Murray, Col. Wyndham (Bath) TELLERS FOR THE NOES.—Sir Alexander Acland-Hood
Gore, Hn. S. F. Ormsby-(Linc) Newdegate, Francis A. N.
Gorst, Rt. Hn. Sir John Eldon Nicholson, William Graham and Mr. Ailwyn Fellowes.
Goulding, Edward Alfred Pease, Herbt. Pike (Darlington)
Groves, James Grimble Pemberton, John S. G.

Original Question again proposed.

MR. CHARLES HOBHOUSE

said that this item of £700,000 included the purchase of remounts. He noticed in the papers a paragraph from Reuter's correspondent stating that in Somaliland camels had been purchased at elastic prices. He thought they were entitled to have some explanation as to how this vast sum of £700,000 had been spent upon transport and remounts. Everybody knew that in this expedition the question of transport had been from first to last the crux of the situation. It had been exceedingly difficult to move troops from post to post but he did not think there was any excuse for such a wastage of animals as was represented by this large sum. He wished to know what number of transport animals was included in this £700,000. During the late Boer war they were constantly told that it was impossible to give the price at which the transport animals were bought, but in the end they were presented with a bill of £15,500,000. With regard to this expedition over £1,000,000 had been spent in transport already, and they ought to have some details of this expenditure. Who was responsible for this expenditure? Were the remounts being bought by the Indian or the British Remount and Transport Department, and upon what system were they bought? Were they bought through the medium of large contractors or haphazard on the spot by advertisement? He wished to know whether economical methods had been adopted and he wanted some general information.

MR. MUNRO FERGUSON (Leith Burghs)

said the sum under this head was a very large one, although nobody could be surprised that the cost of transport in this campaign was very large. This was not merely a question of what they had spent upon transport, but as to what they were going to spend, and the expenditure of the future was certain to be very large. The item as it was now presented to them, was about three times the estimated cost of the whole campaign, and it would continue to be one of their largest items of expenditure. The Secretary of State for War had said he had some expectation of a favourable result, but he could not prophesy as to what the course of events would be, and they were, therefore, pursuing what might be an interminable expenditure, and this would have a very bad effect upon public opinion. He was satisfied that the right hon. Gentleman the Member for Croydon had represented that night the common sense of the country upon the Somaliland campaign. He also believed that the right hon. Gentleman in the views he had expressed represented the views of the majority of the House of Commons and he felt certain that he represented the views of the great majority of people outside the House. This expedition was regarded as a purposeless campaign which offered no hope of termination within a reasonable period, and it was being waged with very little hope of a satisfactory result.

* THE CHAIRMAN

The hon. Member has no right to go into the policy of the campaign except so far as it refers to transport and remounts.

MR. MUNRO FERGUSON

said he merely referred to the size of this item for remounts as an example of the need that there was for some far more specific statement of policy than they had yet received from the War Office, to justify what was a very unsatisfactory campaign.

MR. BROMLEY DAVENPORT

said it was quite true that the Supplementary Estimates were three times the size of the original Estimates, but it should not be forgotten that the original Estimate was based on the assumption that the campaign would have come to an end much earlier. Hon. Members opposite would admit that the whole House had by a majority approved of the campaign, and the only question now before them was whether they would vote the necessary supplies. Ho did not feel so much concerned about the arguments as to the policy, but what did concern him was the fact that they were at war and the troops must be properly supplied well fed, well armed, and well equipped. The House having approved of the policy, it was now asked to vote the necessary supplies. He had been asked how the sum of £700,000 required for transport and remounts was distributed. In respect of £400,000 it represented the transport of troops, animals, and stores from India to the seat of war, and the balance of £300,000 represented, for the most part, the purchase of transport animals, both locally and by the Indian Government. He believed the number of animals—camels, horses, and mules—was about 19,000. They had cost, therefore, an average of about £16 each. He did not know that unnecessarily high prices had been paid.

MR. CHARLES HOBHOUSE

said he did not think the hon. Member could expect them to be quite satisfied with that explanation.

MR. WILLIAM REDMOND

We are not satisfied at all.

MR. CHARLES HOBHOUSE

said he agreed with the hon. Member that if they were going on with this campaign it would be most foolish extravagance not to provide the Army with proper equipment. What the hon. Member did not tell them was upon what system this large amount of transport had been bought. From their experience in the last war in South Africa, they knew that it made all the difference in the world as to how they bought the animals. They had most startling disclosures during the Boer war as to the purchase of remounts, and what guarantee had they that something of the same sort had not been perpetrated in this case. He understood that in India a complete system of information had been organised, and that the Government bought through large contractors, rejecting animals which were not up to the proper standard. Had that method been adopted, or had we gone on under the old system of buying leisurely through dealers, which obtained under the British Remount Department in connection with the War Office? Those were points upon which the Financial Secretary to the Treasury had said nothing, and, while he was very unwilling to move a reduction, to put himself on the safe side, he would move that the Vote be reduced by £100 in order to get an effective answer from the Financial Secretary to the Treasury.

Motion made, and Question proposed, "That Item, Vote 6, Sub-head F (Somaliland Expeditionary Force, Transport and Remounts), be reduced by £100."—(Mr. Charles Hobhouse.)

MR. BROMLEY DAVENPORT

said if the hon. Gentleman was satisfied with the Indian system he might withdraw his Motion. The campaign was being managed and conducted under the Indian Government out of funds provided by the War Department. He was not himself responsible for the conduct of the campaign. The animals were being purchased by the Indian Government, and presumably under the system which the hon. Member approved.

MR. FLYNN

complained that the estimate was originally only £100,000. Who outside Bedlam would have expected to see the Estimate swollen from £100,000 to £800,000. He remembered reading some of the detailed accounts of the expedition against the Mad Mullah—he was rather inclined to think the word "Mad" should be transferred from the the Mullah to the War Office. He could not forget having read that we were so unprepared for the expedition on which we had entered that the wily dervishes took the opportunity to sell us their camels at enhanced prices. Clearly the Indian Government had failed to take the proper precautions to secure a supply of transport animals. There was too much elasticity in this Estimate—indeed, to describe as elastic an increase of eight times the original Estimate was to abuse the word; it was something more than elastic.

MR. WILLIAM REDMOND

complained that although they had been told that the campaign was being conducted by the Indian Government, yet they had not had a single, solitary word from the Secretary for India to show that he took the slightest interest in the matter. He could not admit that the House of Commons had accepted the responsibility for this war. At every stage in connection with the proceedings most vigorous and emphatic protests had been entered against the operations by Members of the House. Even the majority could not be said to have authorised the expenditure.

* THE CHAIRMAN

Order, order! The hon. Gentleman is now travelling a long way from the Vote before the Committee.

MR. WILLIAM REDMOND

said he recognised that the right hon. Gentleman was anxious to conduct the proceedings in the fairest possible way, but he submitted that he was only making a legitimate reply to a statement from the Government Benches as to the responsibility of the House of Commons.

* THE CHAIRMAN

That was the reason why I did not interrupt the hon. Member before. I now invite him to give his attention to the item before the Committee.

MR. WILLIAM REDMOND

I am very much obliged for your kindly invitation. I am most anxious to pay the closest attention in my power to the Vote. The hon. Member then went on to state that his objection to the item was that the House sanctioned the expedition on the understanding that £100,000 would be sufficient for transport, yet now the heads of the War Office came down and said, "We have made a little mistake; we ought to have asked for £800,000 for transports in this wretched, miserable war in Somaliland." Would hon. Members have so cheerfully voted money for the war had they known that the expenditure on that would have been so enormously increased? This one item was an illustration of the whole policy of the Government in the matter. Nobody knew where we were being led to. Was it unreasonable for hon. Members representing Ireland to ask for a plain and clear indication as to what was in the minds of the authorities with regard to this protracted campaign? Were they to anticipate any further increases of expenditure?

* THE CHAIRMAN

I am afraid the hon. Member has forgotten my invitation. I must renew my invitation to him to confine himself strictly to the item now before the Committee.

MR. WILLIAM REDMOND

I certainly had not forgotten you, Sir, and I hope I never shall.

MR. ARNOLD-FORSTER

rose in his place and claimed to move, That the Question be now put.

* THE CHAIRMAN

I think the hon. Member is about to bring his observations to a close, therefore for the present I will not accept the Motion.

MR. WILLIAM REDMOND

You are perfectly correct, Sir. It is a good thing for the good order and good temper of the debate that you are in the chair instead of a gentleman so impatient that he will not allow anybody to criticise, even for five minutes, the Department for which he is reponsible. In conclusion, the hon. Member asked if the ratepayers were ever to get rid of the nightmare of that miserable, inglorious, and futile expedition? Was it in accordance with ancient usage that such Supplementary Estimates should be put down without any explanation at all? He claimed that they ought to protest by dividing against that system of enormously increased Supplementary Estimates and also against a war, commenced by the Foreign Office, muddled by the War Office but managed by the India Office, the representative of which had not deigned to say a word in regard to it.

* MR. HERBERT SAMUEL (Yorkshire, Cleveland)

asked if the Government had taken every possible step to secure the utmost economy in this matter. In the Report of the Royal Commission on the South African War was the evidence of several witnesses who recommended the appointment of financial advisers to be attached to future expeditions in order to advise the General Commanding and to have an oversight over questions of contracting and accountancy. Had that course been followed in the present instance?

MR. LOUGH (Islington, W.)

inquired if the sum now asked for covered any estimated expenditure beyond the 31st March?

MR. ARNOLD-FORSTER

replied that the purchases were made in this case in Aden and India, and there was consequently no necessity to attach a financial adviser to the staff of the commander of the expedition. In reply to the hon. Member for Islington, of course only expenditure to the 31st March was covered by the Estimate.

MR. FLYNN

said his information was that the bulk of the camels were purchased at the seat of war.

MR. FLAVIN (Kerry, N.)

complained of the unsatisfactory character of the Government explanations.

Question put.

The Committee divided: Ayes, 120; Noes, 169; (Division List No. 26)

AYES.
Abraham, William (Cork, N.E.) Hayter, Rt. Hon. Sir Arthur D. Reddy, M.
Asquith, Rt. Hn. Herb. Henry Hemphill, Rt. Hon. Charles H. Redmond, John E. (Waterford)
Barry, B. (Cork, S.) Humphreys-Owen, Arthur C. Redmond, William (Clare)
Bayley, Thomas (Derbyshire) Johnson, John (Gateshead) Rickett, J. Compton
Beaumont, Wentworth, C. B. Jones, William (Carnarvonshire) Roberts, John Bryn (Eifion)
Bell, Richard Joyce, Michael Roche, John
Blake, Edward Kearley, Hudson E. Rose, Charles Day
Boland, John Kilbride, Denis Runciman, Walter
Brigg, John Labouchere, Henry Samuel, Herbert L. (Cleveland)
Broadhurst, Henry Layland- Barratt, Francis Samuel, S. M. (Whitechapel)
Bryce, Rt. Hon. James Leigh, Sir Joseph Sheehan, Daniel Daniel
Buchanan, Thomas Ryburn Leng, Sir John Sheehy, David
Burke, E. Haviland- Lewis, John Herbert Shipman, Dr. John G.
Buxton, Sydney Charles Lough, Thomas Sinclair, John (Forfarshire)
Caldwell, James Lundon, W. Slack, John Bamford
Campbell, John (Armagh, S.) MacNeill, John Gordon Swift Spencer, Rt. Hn. C. R. (Northants)
Condon, Thomas Joseph MacVeagh, Jeremiah Stevenson, Francis S.
Crean, Eugene M'Arthur, William (Cornwall) Sullivan, Donal
Davies, Alfred (Carmarthen) M'Hugh, Patrick A. Thomas, Abel (Carmarthen, E.)
Davies, M. Vaughan-(Cardigan) M'Kean, John Thomas, Sir A. (Glamorgan, E.)
Delany, William M'Kenna, Reginald Thomas, D. Alfred (Merthyr)
Devlin, Chas. Ramsay (Galway) Mansfield, Horace Rendall Tomkinson, James
Devlin, Joseph (Kilkenny, N.) Mooney, John J. Toulmin, George
Donelan, Captain A. Morgan, J. Lloyd (Carmarthen) Trevelyan, Charles Philips
Doogan, P. C. Murphy, John Warner, Thomas Courtenay T.
Douglas, Charles M. (Lanark) Nannetti, Joseph P. Wason, Eugene (Clackmannan)
Ellis, John Edward (Notts.) Nolan, Joseph (Louth, South) Wason, Jn. Cathcart (Orkney)
Evans, Samuel T. (Glamorgan) O'Brien, Patrick (Kilkenny) White, George (Norfolk)
Fenwick, Charles O'Connor, James (Wicklow, W. White, Luke (York, E. R.)
Ferguson, R. C. Munro (Leith) O'Donnell, John (Mayo, S.) Whiteley, George (York, W. R.)
Flavin, Michael Joseph O'Donnell, T. (Kerry, W.) Whitley, J. H. (Halifax)
Flynn, James Christopher O'Dowd, John Williams, Osmond (Merioneth)
Foster, Sir Walter (Derby Co.) O'Kelly, Jas. (Roscommon, N.) Wilson, John (Durham, Mid.)
Freeman-Thomas, Captain F. O'Malley, William Woodhouse, Sir J.T (Hudd'rsf'd
Fuller, J. M. F. O' Mara, James Young, Samuel
Gilhooly, James O'Shaughnessy, P. J. Yoxall, James Henry
Gladstone, Rt. Hn. Herb. John Partington, Oswald
Goddard, Daniel Ford Perks, Robert William
Griffith, Ellis J. Power, Patrick Joseph TELLERS FOR THE AYES—Mr. Charles Hobhouse and Sir Joseph Leese.
Haldane, Rt. Hon. Richard B. Priestley, Arthur
Harmsworth, R. (Leicester) Rea, Russell
Hayden, John Patrick Reckitt, Harold James
NOES.
Agg-Gardner, James Tynte Bond, Edward Davenport, W. Bromley-
Agnew, Sir Andrew Noel Bowles, Lt.-Col. H.F. (Middlesex Dickson, Charles Scott
Allhusen, Augustus Hen. Eden Brodrick, Rt. Hon. St. John Digby, John K. D. Wingfield-
Anson, Sir William Reynell Bull, William James Douglas, Rt. Hon. A. Akers-
Arnold-Forster, Rt. Hn. Hugh O. Butcher, John George Doxford, Sir William Theodore
Atkinson, Rt. Hon. John Carson, Rt. Hon. Sir Edw. H. Durning-Lawrence, Sir Edwin
Bailey, James (Walworth) Cavendish, V.C.W.(Derby shire) Dyke, Rt. Hon. Sir William Hart
Bain, Colonel James Robert Cayzer, Sir Charles William Faber, Edmund B. (Hants, W.)
Baird, John George Alexander Cecil, Lord Hugh (Greenwich) Faber, George Denison (York)
Balcarres, Lord Chamberlain, Rt Hn. J. A. (Worc. Finch, Rt. Hon. George H.
Balfour, Rt. Hon. G. W. (Leeds) Give, Captain Percy A. Finlay, Sir Robert Bannatyne
Balfour, Kenneth R. (Christeh.) Cochrane, Hon. Thos. H. A. E. FitzGerald, Sir Robert Penrose-
Banbury, Sir Frederick George Coghill, Douglas Harry Fitzroy, Hon. Edward Algernon
Bartley, Sir George C. T. Colston, Chas. Edw. H. Athole Flannery, Sir Fortescue
Beach, Rt. Hn. Sir Mich. Hicks Compton, Lord Alwyne Forster, Henry William
Bhownaggree, Sir M. M. Cook, Sir Frederick Lucas Fyler, John Arthur
Bignold, Arthur Crossley, Rt. Hon. Sir Savile Galloway, William Johnson
Bigwood, James Dalkeith, Earl of Gordon, Maj Evans-(T'rH'mlets)
Blundell, Colonel Henry Dalrymple, Sir Charles Gore, Hn G. R.C. Ormsby-(Salop)
Gorst, Rt. Hon. Sir John Eldon Lonsdale, John Brownlee Sackville, Col. S. G. Stopford-
Goschen, Hon. George Joachim Lucas, Col. Francis (Lowestoft) Sadler, Col. Samuel Alexander
Goulding, Edward Alfred Lucas, Reginald J.(Portsmouth) Scott, Sir S. (Marylebone, W.)
Greene, Henry D. (Shrewsbury) Lyttelton, Rt. Hon. Alfred Sharpe, William Edward T.
Grenfell, William Henry Macdona, John Gumming Sloan, Thomas Henry
Groves, James Grimble M'Arthur, Charles (Liverpool) Smith, Abel H. (Hertford, East)
Hambro, Charles Eric M'Killop, James (Stirlingshire) Smith, H. C (North'mb, Tyneside)
Hamilton, Marq of (L'donderry) Manners, Lord Cecil Spear, John Ward
Harris, F. Leverton (Tynem'th) Maxwell, W.J.H. (Dumfriesshire) Stanley, Hon. Arthur (Ormskirk)
Harris, Dr. Fredk. E. (Dulwich) Milner, Rt. Hn. Sir Frederick G. Stanley, Rt. Hon. Lord (Lanes.)
Haslam, Sir Alfred S. Milvain, Thomas Stock, James Henry
Haslett, Sir James Horner Montagu, G. (Huntingdon) Stroyan, John
Heath, Arthur Howard (Hanley) Morgan, David J. (Walthamstow) Strutt, Hon. Charles Hedley
Heath, J antes (Staffords., N. W.) Morrell, George Herbert Talbot, Rt. Hn. J. G. (Oxf'd Univ.)
Henderson, Sir A. (Stafford, W.) Morton, Arthur H. Aylmer Taylor, Austin (East Toxteth)
Hermon-Hodge, Sir Robert T. Mount, William Arthur Thornton, Percy M.
Hickman, Sir Alfred Mowbray, Sir Robert Gray C. Tollemache, Henry James
Hoare, Sir Samuel Murray, Rt Hn. A. Graham (Bute Tomlinson, Sir Wm. Edw. M.
Hogg, Lindsay Murray, Charles J. (Coventry) Tuff, Charles
Hoult, Joseph Murray, Col. Wyndham (Bath) Valentia, Viscount
Houston, Robert Paterson Newdegate, Francis A. N. Vincent, Sir Edgar (Exeter)
Howard, John(Kent Faversham) Nicholson, William Graham Walker, Col. William Hall
Hozier, Hon. James Henry Cecil Pease, Herbert Pike (Darlington Walrond, Rt. Hon. Sir William H.
Hunt, Rowland Pemberton, John S. G. Warde, Colonel C. E.
Johnstone, Heywood (Sussex) Percy, Earl Whiteley, H.(Ashton und. Lyne)
Kennaway, Rt. Hon. Sir John H. Pilkington, Colonel Richard Whitmore, Charles Algernon
Kenyon-Slaney, Col. W. (Salop.) Plummer, Walter R. Willox, Sir John Archibald
Kerr, John Powell, Sir Francis Sharp Wilson, A. Stanley (York, E.R.)
Law, Andrew Bonar (Glasgow) Pretyman, Ernest George Wilson-Todd, Sir W.H.(Yorks.)
Lawrence, Sir Joseph (Monm'th) Pryce-Jones, Lt.-Col. Edward Wodehouse, Rt. Hn. E.R. (Bath)
Lawrence, Wm. F. (Liverpool) Pym, C. Guy Wortley, Rt. Hon. C. B. Stuart-
Lawson, John Grant (Yorks. N.R) Rasch, Sir Frederic Carne Wylie, Alexander
Lee, Arthur H.(Hants., Fareham) Ratcliff, R. F. Wyndham, Rt. Hon. George
Lees, Sir Elliott (Birkenhead) Reid, James (Greenock) Wyndham-Quin, Major W. H.
Legge, Col. Hon. Heneage Remnant, James Farquharson
Leveson-Gower, Frederick N. S. Robertson, Herbert (Hackney) TELLERS FOR THE NOES—Sir Alexander Acland-Hood and Mr. Ailwyn Fellowes.
Llewellyn, Evan Henry Rollit, Sir Albert Kaye
Long, Col. Charles W.(Evesham) Ropner, Colonel Sir Robert
Long, Rt. Hn. Walter(Bristol, S.) Rutherford, W. W. (Liverpool)

Original Question again proposed.

MR. BUCHANAN

remarked that various explanations had been given with regard to the item of £900,000 for Imperial railways, the latest, and probably the best considered and most accurate, being that these railways in the Transvaal and the Orange River Colony were taken and worked by the military authorities during the war, that they were worked by them on their own account to 31st March, 1902, and on the colonial account until 30th June, 1902; that so far as working expenses during that period were concerned, there was nothing included in the Vote; and that during their occupation the military spent large sums of money in improving the lines and purchasing rolling-stock. All this expenditure took place before 31st March, because anything after that date would have been debited to the colonial Government. Apparently the House of Commons was never informed of he matter, as no entry of the expenditture appeared on the Estimates, unless, as had been suggested, it was included in the item of £350,000 for stores supplied from stock. If that suggestion was correct, he did not think it was a fair or frank method of bringing so important a matter before the House. It further appeared that this money was carried to, and kept for two years in, a Suspense Account. That was a somewhat unusual course, and he desired to know whether it had the sanction of the Treasury; if so, whether there was no limit as to the amount for, and the time which, such a suspense account could be carried on. As to the counter-claim the Committee was entitled to know on what basis it was made up, and on what foundation the expectation that the bulk of the money would be refunded by the Transvaal was raised. Further, was the £1,000,000 expected from the Transvaal, the £1,000,000 due under the South African Loan Act of last year, or was it the sum expected to be paid in respect of the expenditure on the lines during their occupation by the military authorities? In order to elicit a reply on these points he moved to reduce the Vote by £5,000.

Motion made, and Question proposed, "That Item, Vote 6, Sub-head BB (South Africa, Expenditure in connection with Imperial Military Railways), be reduced by £5,000."—(Mr. Buchanan.)

* SIR EDGAR VINCENT (Exeter)

asked from what source this £900,000 was obtained. It appeared to be admitted that in or before 1902, a sum of either £900,000 or £1,230,000 had been paid on account of the railways in South Africa. No Vote had been taken in the House to justify the expenditure, and no mention of the payment appeared in the Finance Accounts of 1902 or 1903. It came as a great shock to him to learn that so large a sum as £900,000 could be paid without any authority from Parliament, and without any mention in the financial accounts of the year that such a payment had been made. Was this payment included in the Exchequer issues for Army Services in 1902 or 1903? If it was, he did not understand the necessity for a Supplementary Estimate now. If it was not so included, the natural conclusion was that money voted for totally different purposes had been diverted to this, and unless some explanation could be given, their confidence in the whole system of accounts must be considerably shaken. There certainly appeared to have been a breach of the rules of sound financial administration.

SIR JOSEPH LEESE (Lancashire, Accrington)

understood that this sum of £900,000 had been spent by the Imperial Government on the railways, and that there was an obligation on the part of somebody to repay the money, but that it was not repaid because something in the nature of a counter-claim had been set up. That being so, he desired to ask what were the particulars of the counter-claim, was it simply a case of unliquidated damages? Who were the parties to the issue, and by what tribunal was the case to be tried?

* THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER (Mr. AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN,) Worcestershire, E.

said the last point had already been answered. ["No." He did not know whether the hon. Member for Accrington attached value to the legal phraseology in which he couched his inquiries.

SIR JOSEPH LEESE

said that what he wanted to know was who made the counter-claim, and what were its details?

* MR. AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN

explained that there was a claim for a sum of money now on the Votes, a claim which, after this Vote was passed, remained unaffected, on the part of the Government of this country against the Government of the Colony. There was a counterclaim by the Government of the Colony, which was not admitted by His Majesty's Government, for wear and tear and damage to the railways while in the possession or occupation of the military authorities. His object in rising, however, was not to repeat an explanation he had already given, but to reply to the inquiries of the hon. Member for East Perthshire and his hon. friend the Member for Exeter. His hon. friend had asked about the £900,000 expended in improvements to the railways in the colonies and he wished to know from what source that money was obtained. The history of the transaction was this: the military authorities reported that certain additions to railway communications were required for military operations for the war which was then being conducted. They also required additional rolling stock to successfully conclude the war. The Civil Government agreed that these additions would be of value to the Colony when they took over the railways on the re-establishment of peace. They agreed to pay for them, and did not dispute their liability to pay on that account. In these circumstances, the War Office applied to the Chancellor of the Exchequer of the day to know whether they might sanction an advance from military funds for these purposes, and the Treasury gave their approval. This sum was provided for in the Exchequer issues of 1901–2 and 1902–3. Thus, on the 31st of March, certain liabilities remained outstanding, being represented by the outstanding imprests for which accounts were not rendered. His hon. friend had asked whether this continued for an unlimited time without coming to the knowledge of the Department, and whether this sum was included in the Exchequer issues. This sum was provided out of the Exchequer issues. The House of Commons voted a certain sum of money and the Exchequer issues were within the limits of the sum voted by the House on the demand of the spending Department. As this expenditure took place all over the world, it was impossible to know what would be the actual claim on the 31st March, and it inevitably happened that some balances remained unexpended on the 31st of March. He would assume, for example, that the House granted £10,000 for a particular purpose. The spending Department would draw upon the Exchequer for £10,000, but when the accounts were closed and audited he would assume that they had not spent the £10,000 but £100 short of that amount. What then would be the procedure? That £100 which they had received and which was an Exchequer issue, but for which they could produce no voucher in that year, would be deducted from the grant which Parliament made to them in the subsequent year. They would be considered as having that amount in hand, and the Vote which Parliament made would be paid to them in an Exchequer issue less by the amount remaining unaccounted for at the close of the previous year. This money which had been referred to was included in the Exchequer issues of 1901–2 and 1902–3. His hon. friend had inquired how long this had gone on without coming to the knowledge of the Department. The accounts of any financial year, which ended on 31st March, were finally closed on 30th September. As soon as possible after that date the Comptroller and Auditor-General was furnished with a statement of the balance outstanding on these accounts. That statement appeared on the Appropriation Accounts rendered to Parliament, and the Committee would find the whole of the sum included in the Appropriation Accounts, which would be in the hands of Members in a very few days, together with the remarks of the Comptroller and Auditor-General upon them.

MR. BUCHANAN

asked if the right hon. Gentleman meant that this sum was included in the Appropriation Accounts of 1901–2 or 1902–3.

* MR. AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN

said it was alluded to in the Auditor-General's Report for 1901–2, and the whole matter in its final and definite form would appear in the Comptroller and Auditor-General's Report on the Appropriation Accounts of 1902–3. A complaint had been made that the Auditor and Comptroller-General had not called attention to this matter, but he was aware of what was going on as would be seen from the correspondence which he carried on with the War Office and the Treasury at that time. The hon. Member himself was a member of the Public Accounts Committee for many years, and he knew that the Comptroller and Auditor-General was the officer of this House and not of the Treasury or of any Department of the Government; in fact he was independent of them, and it was not for them to suggest what action he should take. He was not quite sure whether he had made this matter clear to the House, but his hon. friend would understand that the money was included in the Exchequer issues; it appeared as an outstanding balance and could not run beyond the 30th.of September without being disclosed by the War Office, and reported to the House by the Comptroller and Auditor-General. He thought it would have been better if the Treasury had insisted that a Supplementary Estimate should have been taken for this sum at an earlier time. He was loth to criticise even in a friendly spirit anything that had been done by the Treasury when he was not responsible, but as a guide for the future he thought the Treasury ought to take the earliest opportunity of placing sums of this kind before the House in the form of Estimates, reserving to themselves the full right of claiming repayment from those from whom repayment was due. The voting of this money would close the War Office account, but it would not give any relief to the person upon whom they had a claim; their claim remained in force, and they would do their best to secure its payment in due time. He had told the House the history of this very complicated matter, and he did not think the Treasury ought to allow a sum of this kind to be carried beyond the very first opportunity they had of bringing it to the notice of the House.

SIR JOSEPH LEESE

asked what tribunal was it proposed should decide as to the value of the claim and counterclaim.

* MR. AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN

said there was no tribunal required to settle a dispute between the colonial Government and the home Government.

SIR JOSEPH LEESE

asked who was to decide on the counter-claim.

* MR. AUSTEN CHAMBERLAIN

said this was a matter of arrangement between the colonial authorities and the Government. He deprecated any suggestion that a question of account or claim and counter-claim between a colony and ourselves should be treated as a matter to be referred to some outside tribunal. He hoped that they might arrange these matters amicably by negotiations between the authorities at home and in the colony, without the necessity of introducing any third party.

* SIR M. HICKS BEACH (Bristol, W.)

said that, as the Chancellor of the Exchequer who was responsible for allowing this expenditure out of the Army Votes in 1901–2, he thought his right hon. friend had given a perfectly fair account of what happened at that time. There certainly was a clear understanding given to him by those who represented the War Office at the time, that this expenditure was absolutely necessary for the purposes of the war, and therefore he thought that it might be properly charged on the Exchequer issues for the war. The expenditure was for rolling stock and repairing the line, and therefore he further obtained a promise that on account of the improvement in the rolling stock and in the line, which, of course, would be due to that expenditure, the colonial Government, which after the war took over the railway, and would have the benefit of the railways in the future, would recoup the Imperial Exchequer for both those amounts. In those circumstances he sanctioned that expenditure. He ceased to be Chancellor of the Exchequer in August, 1902, and of course knew nothing of any subsequent proceedings; but he could quite understand that his successor did not like apparently to throw doubt upon the recovery of the money from the Transvaal by submitting an Estimate in the year 1902–03 for its repayment; and he hoped that nothing that had been said, or would be said, in that debate would throw any doubt upon that recovery. He did not think that any fairer charge could be imposed upon the Colonies than this. They would have the benefit of all the expenditure, and, as to the counter claim, personally he did not much believe in it.

MR. SYDNEY BUXTON

said he was sure no hon. Member would cast any doubt upon this counter-claim. As regarded the actual position of this particular fund he was left as much in the dark at the end of the right hon. Gentleman's speech as he was at the beginning. He thought the criticisms of his hon. friend had been more than justified and he agreed that this sum ought not to appear in this way, and it ought to have been liquidated before. Under these circumstances he did not think it was worth while to pursue the discussion of a very difficult question which he had great difficulty in following, and which had not been made much clearer by the speech of the right hon. Gentleman. While he agreed that the small sums might very well be left in the suspense account it was not right that such a large sum as £900,000 should to be left over for two years in the suspense account which practically left it in the control of a particular Department. After the white sheet in which the Chancellor of the Exchequer had stood he did not desire to pursue the subject further.

MR. WHITLEY

pointed out that one question which had not been dealt with was that this £1,250,000 was a claim on the Transvaal Government at the time these railways were handed over. The Committee would recollect that some ten months ago the House decided to authorise the raising of £35,000,000 under the Imperial guarantee, and part of that money, amounting to about £12,000,000, was to go to pay the Dutch shareholders and others who were the previous owners of those railways. Surely the claim of the home Government upon the colonial Government was in the nature of a prior claim. When those railways were handed over to the colonial Government as a business concern they were informed that they would produce a profit of no less than £2,500,000 a year, and it was clear that if the Government had shown any business capacity they would have insisted that this claim, which they said was a perfectly sound and just one, should have been met whilst they were owners of the line and they should have made proper arrangement for the settlement of their claim. The sum of £12,000,000 had been paid to the Dutch shareholders and the claim of the British taxpayer had been allowed to go by the board. The Chancellor of the Exchequer had given them no satisfactory assurance as to what was the nature of the acknowledgment of this debt. He wished to know if the right hon. Gentleman would lay on the Table any correspondence from Lord Milner which would show that this question had been treated as a legal obligation which they might recover. J After Lord Milner's Government had stated that a profit of £2,500,000 a year was anticipated from these railways he thought the claim of the British taxpayers ought not to be deferred in this way, and it ought to be made a first charge upon the undertaking. He hoped they would be able to get more information upon this point.

MR. O'MARA

said he should like to know something more about the counterclaim which the Colonies had made. They had heard nothing yet as to how far this country had been committed with regard to the spending of this £900,000. In the year 1901–02 the Chancellor of the Exchequer authorised the expenditure of £900,000 for the purpose of improving railways in South Africa on the understanding from the War Office that this expenditure was necessary for the purpose of carrying on the war, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer of that day received an assurance that this sum would be repaid at the end of the war. On those two assurances the Chancellor of the Exchequer of 1901–2 authorised the expenditure of this money. The House of Commons was not informed of this fact, and it had not come within the cognisance of the House until the present time. It was a very serious thing for any Chancellor of the Exchequer to authorise payments, simply on the assurance of a Civil Government, over which he exercised no control, without first obtaining the consent of the House of Commons to the expenditure of such money. He considered that this was a breach of the traditional policy which governed the finances of this House. Any Chancellor of the Exchequer who did this kind of thing laid himself open to a charge of a gross breach of confidence in this House. How could they feel sure, under these circumstances, that the present Chancellor of the Exchequer was not receiving similar assurances, and that public money was not now being spent in millions without the House knowing anything about it. Here was a sum of £900,000 which had been spent and the House was not informed of it until two years afterwards. He thought the right hon. Gentleman the Member for Bristol had taken upon himself a responsibility which he ought not to have done. [Cries of "Divide, divide."] He could quite understand that hon. Members opposite did not care much about £900,000——

Mr. Secretary AKERS-DOUGLAS

rose in his place, and claimed to move, "That the Question be now put."

Question put, "That the Question be now put."

The Committee divided:—Ayes, 170; Noes, 113. (Division List No. 27)

AYES.
Agg-Gardner, James Tynte Gray, Ernest (West Ham) Murray, Col. Wyndham (Bath)
Agnew, Sir Andrew Noel Greene, Henry D. (Shrewsbury) Nicholson, William Graham
Allhusen, Augustus Henry Eden Grenfell, William Henry Pease, Herbert Pike (Darlington)
Anson, Sir William Reynell Groves, James Grimble Peel, Hn. Wm. Robert Wellesley
Arnold-Forster, Rt. Hn. Hugh O. Hambro, Charles Eric Pemberton, John S. G.
Atkinson, Rt. Hon. John Hamilton, Marq. of (L'donderry) Percy, Earl
Bailey, James (Walworth) Hare, Thomas Leigh Pilkington, Colonel Richard
Bain, Colonel James Robert Harris, F. Leverton (Tynem'th) Plummer, Walter R.
Balcarres, Lord Harris, Dr. Fredk. R. (Dulwich) Powell, Sir Francis Sharp
Balfour, Rt. Hn Gerald W. (Leeds Haslam, Sir Alfred S. Pretyman, Ernest George
Balfour, Kenneth R. (Christch.) Haslett, Sir James Horner- Pryce-Jones, Lt.-Col. Edward
Banbury, Sir Frederick George Hay, Hon. Claude George Pym, C. Guy
Bartley, Sir George C. T. Heath, Arthur Howard (Hanley) Rasch, Sir Frederic Carne
Beach, Rt. Hn. Sir Michael Hicks Heath, James (Staffords., N.W.) Ratcliff, R. F.
Bhownaggree, Sir M. M. Hormon-Hodge, Sir Robert T. Reid, James (Greenock)
Bignold, Arthur Hickman, Sir Alfred Remnant, James Farquharson
Bigwood, James Hoare, Sir Samuel Robertson, Herbert (Hackney)
Blundell, Colonel Henry Hogg, Lindsay Rollit, Sir Albert Kaye
Bond, Edward Hoult, Joseph Ropner, Colonel Sir Robert
Bowles, Lt.-Col. H.F. (Middlesex Houston, Robert Paterson Rutherford, W. W. (Liverpool)
Brodrick, Rt. Hon. St. John Howard, John (Kent, Faversh'm) Sackville, Col. S. G. Stopford-
Butcher, John George Hozier, Hon. James Henry Cecil Sadler, Col. Samuel Alexander
Carson, Rt. Hon. Sir Edw. H. Hunt, Rowland Scott, Sir S. (Marylebone, W.)
Cavendish, V. C. W. (Derbyshire) Jessel, Captain Herbert Merton Sharpe, William Edward T.
Cayzer, Sir Charles William Johnstone, Heywood (Sussex) Smith, H. C. (North'mb. Tyneside)
Chamberlain, Rt Hn. J.A.(Worc. Kennaway, Rt. Hon. Sir John H. Spear, John Ward
Clive, Captain Percy A. Kenyon-Slaney, Col. W. (Salop. Stanley, Hon. Arthur (Ormskirk)
Cochrane, Hon. Thos, H. A. E. Kerr, John Stanley, Rt. Hon. Lord (Lancs.)
Coghill, Douglas Harry Law, Andrew Bonar (Glasgow) Stock, James Henry
Colston, Chas. Edw. H. Athole Lawrence, Sir Joseph (Monm'th) Stroyan, John
Compton, Lord Alwyne Lawrence, Wm. F. (Liverpool) Strutt, Hon. Charles Hedley
Crossley, Rt. Hon. Sir Savile Lawson, John Grant (Yorks. N.R) Talbot, Rt. Hn. J.G. (Oxfd Univ.)
Cust, Henry John C. Lee, Arthur H. (Hants., Fareham) Taylor, Austin (East Toxteth)
Dalkeith, Earl of Lees, Sir Elliott (Birkenhead) Thornton, Percy M.
Dalrymple, Sir Charles Legge, Col. Hon. Heneage Tollemache, Henry James
Davenport, W. Bromley- Leveson-Gower, Frederick N.S. Tomlinson, Sir Wm. Edw. M.
Dickinson, Robert Edmond Long, Col. Charles W. (Evesham Tuff, Charles
Dickson, Charles Scott Long, Rt. Hn. Walter (Bristol, S.) Valentia, Viscount
Digby, John K. D. Wingfield- Lonsdale, John Brownlee Vincent, Sir Edgar (Exeter)
Douglas, Rt. Hon. A. Akers- Lucas, Col. Francis (Lowestoft) Walker, Col. William Hall
Doxford, Sir William Theodore Lucas, Reginald J. (Portsmouth) Walrond, Rt. Hon. Sir William H.
Durning-Lawrence, Sir Edwin Lyttelton, Rt. Hon. Alfred Warde, Colonel C. E.
Faber, Edmund B. (Hants, W.) Macdona, John dimming Welby, Lt.-Col. A.C.E. (Taunton)
Faber, George Denison (York) M'Arthur, Charles (Liverpool) Welby, Sir Charles G.E. (Notts.)
Fielden, Edward Brocklehurst M'Killop, James (Stirlingshire) Whiteley, H.(Ashton und. Lyne)
Finch, Rt. Hon. George H. Manners, Lord Cecil Whitmore, Charles Algernon
Finlay, Sir Robert Bannatyne Maxwell, W.J. H. (Dumfriesshire) Willox, Sir John Archibald
Fitzroy, Hon. Edward Algernon Milner, Rt. Hn. Sir Frederick G. Wilson, A. Stanley (York, E.R.)
Flannery, Sir Fortescue Milvain, Thomas Wilson-Todd, Sir W.H.(Yorks.)
Forster, Henry William Montagu, G. (Huntingdon) Wodehouse, Rt. Hn. E.R.(Bath)
Fyler, John Arthur Morgan, David J. (Walthamstow) Wortley, Rt. Hon. C. B. Stuart-
Calloway, William Johnson Morrell, George Herbert Wylie, Alexander
Gardner, Ernest Morrison, James Archibald Wyndham, Rt. Hon. George
Godson, Sir Augustus Frederick Morton, Arthur H. Ayliner Wyndham-Quin, Major W. H.
Gordon, Maj Evans (T'rH'mlets) Mount, William Arthur
Gore, Hn. G.R.C. Ormsby-(Salop) Mowbray, Sir Robert Gray C. TELLERS FOR THE AYES—Sir Alexander Acland-Hood and Mr. Ailwyn Fellowes.
Goschen, Hon. George Joachim Murray, Rt. Hn. A. Graham (Bute)
Goulding, Edward Alfred Murray, Charles J. (Coventry)
NOES.
Abraham, William (Cork, N.E.) Bayley, Thomas (Derbyshire) Boland, John
Asquith, Rt. Hn. Herbert Henry Beaumont, Wentworth C. B. Brigg, John
Barry, E. (Cork, S.) Blake, Edward Broadhurst, Henry
Bryce, Rt. Hon. James Kearley, Hudson E. Redmond, William (Clare)
Buchanan, Thomas Ryburn Kilbride, Denis Rickett, J. Compton
Caldwell, James Layland-Barratt, Francis Roberts John Bryn (Eifion)
Campbell, John (Armagh, S.) Leese, Sir Joseph F. (Accrington) Roche, John
Causton, Richard Knight Leighy Sir Joseph Rose, Charles Day
Condon, Thomas Joseph Leng, Sir John Runciman, Walter
Crean, Eugene Lewis, John Herbert Samuel, Herbert L. (Cleveland)
Dalziel, James Henry Lundon, W. Samuel, S. M. (Whitechapel)
Davies, Alfred (Carmarthen) MacNeill, John Gordon Swift Sheehan, Daniel Daniel
Delany, William MacVeagh, Jeremiah Sheehy, David
Devlin, Charles Ramsay(Galway M'Arthur, William (Cornwall) Shipman, Dr. John G.
Devlin, Joseph (Kilkenny, N.) M'Hugh, Patrick A. Sinclair, John (Forfarshire)
Doogan, P. C. M'Kean, John Slack, John Bamford
Douglas, Charles M. (Lanark) M'Kenna, Reginald Soares, Ernest J.
Duncan, J. Hastings Mansfield, Horace Rendall Spencer, Rt Hn. C. R. (Northants
Ellis, John Edward (Notts.) Mooney, John J. Sullivan, Donal
Evans, Samuel T. (Glamorgan) Morgan, J. Lloyd (Carmarthen) Thomas, Abel (Carmarthen, E.)
Farquharson, Dr. Robert Murphy, John Thomas, Sir A. (Glamorgan, E.)
Fenwick, Charles Nannetti, Joseph P. Thomas, David Alfred (Merthyr)
Flavin, Michael Joseph Nolan, Joseph (Louth, South) Tomkinson, James
Flynn, James Christopher O' Brien, P. J. (Tipperary N.) Toulmin, George
Foster, Sir Walter (Derby Co.) O' Connor, James (Wicklow, W.) Trevelyan, Charles Philips
Freeman-Thomas, Captain F. O'Donnell, John (Mayo, S.) Warner, Thomas Courtenay T.
Fuller, J. M. F. O'Donnell, T. (Kerry, W.) Wason, Eugene (Clackmannan)
Gilhooly, James O'Dowel, John White, George (Norfolk)
Gladstone, Rt. Hn. Herbert John O'Kelly, James (Roscommon, N.) White, Luke (York, E. R.)
Goddard, Daniel Ford O'Malley, William Whiteley, George (York, W. R.)
Griffith, Ellis J. O'Mara, James Whitley, J. H. (Halifax)
Harmsworth, R. Leicester O'Shaughnessy, P. J. Williams, Osmond (Merioneth)
Hayden, John Patrick Partington, Oswald Wilson, John (Durham, Mid.)
Hayter, Rt. Hon. Sir Arthur D. Power, Patrick Joseph Woodhouse, Sir J.T. (Hudd'rsfld)
Hemphill, Rt. Hon. Charles H. Priestley, Arthur Young, Samuel
Hobhouse, C. E. H. (Bristol, E.) Rea, Russell
Johnson, John (Gateshead) Reckitt, Harold James TELLERS FOR THE NOES—Captain Donelan and Mr. Patrick O'Brien.
Jones, William (Carnarvonshire) Redely, M.
Joyce, Michael Redmond, John E. (Waterford)

Question put accordingly.

The Committee divided:—Ayes, 113 Noes, 171. (Division List No. 28).

AYES.
Abraham, William (Cork, N.E.) Freeman- Thomas, Captain F. Nannetti, Joseph P.
Barry, E. (Cork, S.) Fuller, J. M. F. Nolan, Joseph (Louth, South)
Bayley, Thomas (Derbyshire) Gilhooly, James O'Brien, Patrick (Kilkenny)
Beaumont, Wentworth C. B. Gladstone, Rt. Hn. Herbert John O'Brien, P. J. (Tipperary, N.)
Blake, Edward Goddard, Daniel Ford O'Connor, James (Wicklow, W.)
Boland, John Griffith, Ellis, J. O'Donnell, John (Mayo, S.)
Brigg, John Harmsworth, R. Leicester O'Donnell, T. (Kerry, W.)
Broadhurst, Henry Hay den, John Patrick O' Dowd, John
Bryce, Rt. Hon. James Hayter, Rt. Hon. Sir Arthur D. O 'Kelly, James(Roscommon, N.
Burke, E. Haviland Hemphill, Rt. Hon. Charles H. O'Malley, William
Caldwell, James Hobhouse, C. E. H.(Bristol, E.) O'Mara, James
Campbell, John (Armagh, S.) Johnson, John (Gateshead) O'Shaughnessy, P. J.
Causton, Richard Knight Jones, William (Carnarvonshire) Partington, Oswald
Condon, Thomas Joseph Joyce, Michael Power, Patrick Joseph
Crean, Eugene Kearley, Hudson E. Priestley, Arthur
Dalziel, James Henry Kilbride, Denis Rea, Russell
Davies, Alfred (Carmarthen) Layland-Barratt, Francis Reckitt, Harold James
Delany, William Leigh, Sir Joseph Reddy, M.
Devlin, Charles Ramsay (Galway) Leng, Sir John Redmond, John E. (Waterford)
Devlin, Joseph (Kilkenny, N.) Lewis, John Herbert Redmond, William (Clare)
Donelan, Captain A. Lundon, W. Rickett, J. Compton
Doogan, P. C. MacNeill, John Gordon Swift Roberts, John Bryn (Eifion)
Douglas, Charles M. (Lanark) MacVeagh, Jeremiah Roche, John
Duncan, J. Hastings M'Arthur, William (Cornwall) Rose, Charles Day
Ellis, John Edward (Notts.) M'Hugh, Patrick A. Runciman, Walter
Evans, Samuel T. (Glamorgan) M'Kean, John Samuel, Herbert L. (Cleveland)
Farquharson, Dr. Robert M'Kenna, Reginald Samuel, S. M. (Whitechapel)
Fenwick, Charles Mansfield, Horace Rendall Sheehan, Daniel Daniel
Flavin, Michael Joseph Mooney, John J. Sheehy, David
Flynn, James Christopher Morgan, J. Lloyd (Carmarthen) Shipman, Dr. John G.
Foster, Sir Walter (Derby Co.) Murphy, John Sinclair, John (Forfarshire)
Slack, John Bamford Toulmin George Williams, Osmond (Merioneth)
Soares, Errest J. Trevelyan, Charles Philips. Wilson, John (Durham, Mid)
Spencer, Rt Hn. C. R. (Northants) Warner, Thomas Courtenay T. Woodhouse, Sir J. T. (Hudd'rsfld)
Sullivan, Donal Wason, Eugene (Clackmannan) Young, Samuel
Thomas, Abel (Carmarthen, E.) White, George (Norfolk)
Thomas, Sir A. (Glamorgan, E.) White, Luke (York, E. R.) TELLERS FOR THE AYES—
Thomas, David Alfred (Merthyr) Whiteley, George (York, W.R.) Mr. Buchanan and Sir Joseph Leese.
Tomkinson, James Whitley, J. H. (Halifax)
NOES.
Agg-Gardner, James Tynte Gray, Ernest (West Ham) Nicholson, William Graham
Agnew, Sir Andrew Noel Greene, Henry D.(Shrewsbury) Pease, Herbert Pike (Darlington)
Allhusen, Augustus Henry Eden Grenfell, William Henry Peel, Hn. Wm. Robert Wellesley
Anson, Sir William Reynell Groves, James Grimble Pemberton, John S. G.
Arnold-Forster, Rt. Hn. Hugh O. Hambro, Charles Eric Percy, Earl
Atkinson, Rt. Hon. John Hamilton, Marq. of (L'donderry) Pilkington, Colonel Richard
Bailey, James (Walworth) Hare, Thomas Leigh Plummer, Walter R.
Bain, Colonel James Robert Harris, F. Leverton (Tynem'th Powell, Sir Francis Sharp
Balcarres, Lord Harris, Dr. Fredk. R. (Dulwich) Pretyman, Ernest George
Balfour, Rt Hn Gerald W. (Leeds) Haslam, Sir Alfred S. Pryce Jones, Lt.-Col. Edward
Balfour, Kenneth R. (Christch.) Haslett, Sir James Horner Pym, C. Guy
Banbury, Sir Frederick George Hay, Hon. Claude George Rasch, Sir Frederic Came
Bartley, Sir George C. T. Heath, Arthur Howard (Hanley) Ratcliff, R. F.
Beach, Rt. Hn. Sir Michael Hicks Heath, James (Staffords, N. W.) Reid, James (Greenock)
Bhownaggree, Sir M. M. Hermon-Hodge, Sir Robert T. Remnant, James Farquharson
Bignold, Arthur Hickman, Sir Alfred Robertson, Herbert (Hackney)
Bigwood, James Hoare, Sir Samuel Rollit, Sir Albert Kaye
Blundell, Colonel Henry Hogg, Lindsay Ropner, Colonel Sir Robert
Bond, Edward Hoult, Joseph Rutherford, W. W. (Liverpool)
Bowles, Lt.-Col. H. F. (Middlesex) Houston, Robert Paterson Sackville, Col. S. G. Stopford
Brodrick, Rt. Hon. St. John Howard, John(Kent, Faversh'm) Sadler, Col. Samuel Alexander
Butcher, John George Hozier, Hon. James Henry Cecil Scott, Sir S. (Marylebone, W.)
Carson, Rt. Hon. Sir Edw. H. Hunt, Rowland Sharpe, William Edward T.
Cavendish, V.C.W. (Derbyshire) Jessel, Captain Herbert Merton Smith, H. C (North'mb, Tyneside)
Cayzer, Sir Charles William Johnstone, Heywood (Sussex) Spear, John Ward
Chamberlain, Rt. Hn. J. A. (Worc.) Kennaway, Rt. Hon. Sir John H. Stanley, Hn. Arthur(Ormskirk)
Clive, Captain Percy A. Kenyon Slaney, Col. W.(Salop.) Stanley, Rt. Hon. Lord (Lancs.)
Cochrane, Hon. Thos. H. A. E. Kerr, John Stock, James Henry
Coghill, Douglas Harry Law, Andrew Bonar (Glasgow) Stroyan, John
Colston, Chas. Edw. H. Athole Lawrence, Sir Joseph (Monm'th) Strutt, Hon. Charles Hedley
Compton, Lord Alwyne Lawrence, Wm. F. (Liverpool) Talbot, Rt. Hn. J. G. (Oxf'dUniv.)
Crossley, Rt. Hon. Sir Savile Lawson, John Grant(Yorks, N. R.) Taylor, Austin (East Toxteth)
Cust, Henry John C. Lee, Arthur H.(Hants., Fareham Thornton, Percy M.
Dalkeith, Earl of Lees, Sir Elliott (Birkenhead) Tollemache, Henry James
Dalrymple, Sir Charles Legge, Col. Hon. Heneage Tomlinson, Sir Wm. Edw. M.
Davenport, W. Bromley Leveson-Gower, Frederick N. S. Tuff, Chares
Dickinson, Robert Edmond Long, Col. Charles W. (Evesham) Valentia, Viscount
Dickson, Charles Scott Long, Rt. Hn. Walter (Bristol, S.) Vincent, Sir Edgar (Exeter)
Digby, John K. D. Wingfield- Lonsdale, John Brownlee Walker, Col. William Hall
Douglas, Rt. Hon. A. Akers- Lucas, Col. Francis (Lowestoft) Walrond, Rt. Hn. Sir William H.
Doxford, Sir William Theodore Lucas, Reginald J. (Portsmouth) Warde, Colonel C. E.
Durning-Lawrence, Sir Edwin Lyttelton, Rt. Hon. Alfred Welby, Lt.-Col. A.C.E.(Taunton
Dyke, Rt. Hon. Sir William Hart Macdona, John Cumming Welby, Sir Charles G. E. (Notts.
Faber, Edmund B. (Hants, W.) M'Arthur, Charles (Liverpool) Whiteley, H.(Ashton-und-Lyne
Faber, George Denison (York) M'Killop, James (Stirlingshire) Whitmore, Charles Algernon
Fielden, Edward Brocklehurst Manners, Lord Cecil Willox, Sir John Archibald
Finch, Rt. Hon. George H. Maxwell, W. J. H. (Dumfriesshire Wilson, A. Stanley (York, E.R.)
Finlay, Sir Robert Bannatyne Milner, Rt. Hn. Sir Frederick G. Wilson-Todd, Sir W. H. (Yorks.)
Fitzroy, Hon. Edward Algernon Milvain, Thomas Wodehouse, Rt. Hn. E.R. (Bath)
Flannery, Sir Fortescue Montagu, G. (Huntingdon) Wortley, Rt. Hon. C. B. Stuart
Forster, Henry William Morgan, David J. (Walthamstow Wylie, Alexander
Fyler, John Arthur Morrell, George Herbert Wyndham, Rt. Hon. George
Galloway, William Johnson Morrison, James Archibald Wyndham-Quin, Major H. W.
Gardner, Ernest Morton, Arthur H. Aylmer
Godson, Sir Augustus Frederick Mount, William Arthur TELLERS FOR THE NOES—Sir Alexander Acland-Hood and Mr. Ailwyn Fellowes.
Gordon, Maj Evans-(T'rH'mlets Mowbray, Sir Robert Gray C.
Gore, Hon. S.F. Ormsby-(Linc) Murray, Rt Hn. A. Graham(Bute)
Goschen, Hon. George Joachim Murray, Charles J. (Coventry)
Goulding, Edward Alfred Murray, Col. Wyndham (Bath)
Mr. Secretary AKERS-DOUGLAS

claimed, "That the Original Question be now put."

Original Question put accordingly, "That a Supplementary sum, not exceeding £2,700,000 be granted to His Majesty, to defray the charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1904, for Additional Expenditure, in respect of the following Army Services, viz:—

£
Vote 1. Pay, etc, of the Army 2,000,000
Vote 6. Transport and Remounts 2,100,000
Vote 7. Provisions, Forage, and other Supplies 2,030,000
Total £6,130,000
Excess Appropriations-in-Aid (Votes 1, 6, 7, 9, and 10) 3,430,000
£2,700,000

The Committee divided:—Ayes, 169; Noes, 109. (Division List No. 29.)

AYES.
Agg-Gardner, James Tynte Gardner, Ernest Maxwell, W.J.H (Dumfriesshire)
Agnew, Sir Andrew Noel Godson, Sir Augustus Frederick Milner, Rt. Hon. Sir Frederick G.
Anson, Sir William Reynell Goldon, Maj Evans-(T'rH'mlets) Milvain, Thomas
Arnold-Forster. Rt. Hn. Hugh O. Gore, Hon. S.F. Ormsby (Linc.) Montagu, G. (Huntingdon)
Atkinson, Rt. Hon. John Goschen, Hon. George Joachim Morgan, David. J (Walthamstow)
Bailey, James (Walworth) Goulding, Edward Alfred Worrell, George Herbert
Bain, Colonel James Robert Gray, Ernest (West Ham) Morrison, James Archibald
Balcarres, Lord Greene, Henry D. (Shrewsbury) Morton, Arthur H. Aylmer
Balfour, Rt Hn Gerald W. (Leeds) Grenfell, William Henry Mount, William Arthur
Balfour, Kenneth R. (Christch.) Groves, James Grimble Mowbray, Sir Robert Gray C.
Banbury, Sir Frederick George Hambro, Charles Eric Murray, Rt. Hn. A Graham (Bute)
Bartley, Sir George C. T. Hamilton, Marq. of (L'nd'nderry) Murray, Charles J. (Coventry)
Beach, Rt. Hn. Sir Michael Hicks Hare, Thomas Leigh Murray, Col. Wyndham (Bath)
Bhownaggree, Sir M. M. Harris, F. Leverton (Tynem'th) Nicholson, William Graham
Bignold, Arthur Harris, Dr. Fredk. R. (Dulwich) Pease, Herbert Pike (Darlington
Bigwood, James Haslam, Sir Alfred S. Peel. Hn. Wm. Robert Wellesley
Blundell, Colonel Henry Haslett, Sir James Horner Pemberton, John S. G.
Bond, Edward Hay, Hon. Claude George Percy, Earl
Bowles, Lt.-Col. H. F (Middlesex) Heath, Arthur Howard (Hanley Pilkington, Colonel Richard
Brodrick, Rt. Hon. St. John Heath, James (Staffords, N. W.) Plummer, Walter R.
Butcher, John George Hermon-Hodge, Sir Robert T. Powell, Sir Francis Sharp
Carson, Rt. Hon. Sir Edw. H. Hickman, Sir Alfred Pretyman, Ernest George
Cavendish, V. C. W. (Derbyshire Hoare, Sir Samuel Pryce-Jones, Lt.-Col. Edward
Cayzer, Sir Charles William Hogg, Lindsay Pym, C. Guy
Chamberlain, Rt Hn. J.A.(Worc. Hoult, Joseph Rasch, Sir Frederic Carne
Clive, Captain Percy A. Houston, Robert Paterson Ratcliff, R. F.
Cochrane, Hon. Thos. H. A. E. Howard, John (Kent, Faversh' m) Reid, James (Greenock)
Coghill, Douglas Harry Hozier, Hon. James Henry Cecil Remnant, James Farquharson
Colston, Chas. Edw. H. Athole Hunt, Rowland Robertson, Herbert (Hackney)
Compton, Lord Alwyne Jessel, Captain Herbert Merton Rollit, Sir Albert Kaye
Crossley, Rt. Hon. Sir Savile Johnstone, Heywood (Sussex) Ropner, Colonel Sir Robert
Cust, Henry John C. Kennaway, Rt. Hon. Sir John H. Rutherford, W. W. (Liverpool)
Dalkeith, Earl of Kenyon-Slaney, Col. W.(Salop.
Dalrymple, Sir Charles Kerr, John Sackville, Col. S. G. Stopford
Davenport, William Bromley Law, Andrew Bonar (Glasgow) Sadler, Colonel Samuel A.
Dickinson, Robert Edmond Lawrence, Sir Joseph (Monm'th) Scott, Sir S. (Marylebone, W.)
Dickson, Charles Scott Lawrence, Wm. F. (Liverpool) Sharpe, William Edward T.
Digby, John K. D. Wingfield- Lawson, John Grant (Yorks. N.R Smith, HC. (North'mb. Tyneside
Douglas, Rt. Hon. A. Akers Lee, Arthur H. (Hants., Fareham Spear, John Ward
Doxford Sir William Theodore Lees Sir Elliott (Birkenhead) Stanley, Hn. Arthur (Ormskirk)
Durning-Lawrence, Sir Edwin Legge, Col. Hon. Heneage Stanley, Rt. Hon. Lord (Lancs.)
Dyke, Rt. Hon. Sir William Hart Leveson-Gower, Frederick N.S. Stock, James Henry,
Faber, Edmund B. (Hants, W.) Long, Col. Charles W. (Evesham) Stroyan, John
Faber, George Denison (York) Long, Rt. Hn. Walter (Bristol, S.) Strutt, Hon. Charles Hedley
Fielden, Edward Brocklehurst Lonsdale, John Brownlee Talbot, Rt. Hn. J.G. (Oxfd'Univ.)
Finch, Rt. Hon. George H. Lucas, Col. Francis (Lowestoft) Taylor, Austin (East Toxteth)
Finlay, Sir Robert Bannatyne Lucas, Reginald J. (Portsmouth) Thornton, Percy M.
Fitzroy, Hn. Edward Algernon Lyttelton, Rt. Hon. Alfred Tomlinson, Sir Wm. Edw. M.
Flannery, Sir Fortescue Macdona, John Gumming Tuff, Charles
Forster, Henry William M'Arthur, Charles (Liverpool) Valentia, Viscount
Fyler, John Arthur M'Killop, James (Stirlingshire) Vincent, Sir Edgar (Exeter)
Galloway, William Johnson Manners, Lord Cecil Walker, Col. William Hall
Walrond, Rt. Hon. Sir W. H. Willox, Sir John Archibald Wyndham, Rt. Hon. George
Warde, Colonel C. E. Wilson, A. Stanley (York, E. R. Wyndham-Quin, Major W. H.
Welby, Lt.-Col. A.C.E. (Taunton) Wilson-Todd, Sir W.H.(Yorks.)
Welby, Sir Chas. G. E. (Notts.) Wodehouse, Rt. Hn. E.R.(Bath) TELLERS FOR THE AYES.—Sir Alexander Acland-Hood and Mr. Ailwyn-Fellows.
Whiteley, H. (Ashton und. Lyne) Wortley, Rt. Hon. C. B. Stuart
Whitmore, Charles Algernon Wylie, Alexander
NOES.
Abraham, William (Cork, N. E.) Hemphill, Rt. Hon. Charles H. Reckitt, Harold James
Barry, E. (Cork, S.) Hobhouse, C. E. H. (Bristol, E.) Reddy, M.
Bayley, Thomas (Derbyshire) Johnson, John (Gateshead) Redmond, John E. (Waterford)
Beaumont, Wentworth, C. B. Jones, William (Carnarvonshire Redmond, William (Clare)
Blake, Edward Joyce, Michael Rickett, J. Compton
Boland, John Kearley, Hudson E. Roberts, John Bryn (Eifion)
Brigg, John Kilbride, Denis Roche, John
Broadhurst, Henry Layland-Barratt, Francis Rose, Charles Day
Bryce, Rt. Hon. James Leese, Sir Joseph F. (Accrington) Samuel, Herbert L. (Cleveland)
Buchanan, Thomas Ryburn Leigh, Sir Joseph Samuel, S. M. (Whitechapel)
Burke, E. Haviland Leng, Sir John Sheehan, Daniel Daniel
Caldwell, James Lewis, John Herbert Sheehy, David
Campbell, John (Armagh, S.) Lundon, W. Shipman, Dr. John G.
Causton, Richard Knight MacNeill, John Gordon Swift Sinclair, John (Forfarshire)
Crean, Eugene MacVeagh, Jeremiah Slack, John Bamford
Dalziel, James Henry M'Arthur, William (Cornwall) Spencer, Rt. Hn. C. R (Northants)
Davies, Alfred (Carmarthen) M'Hugh, Patrick A. Sullivan, Donal
Delany, William M'Kean, John Thomas, Abel (Carmarthen, E.)
Devlin, Chas. Ramsay (Galway) M'Kenna, Reginald Thomas, Sir A. (Glamorgan, E.)
Devlin, Joseph (Kilkenny, N.) Mansfield, Horace Kendall Thomas, David Alfred (Morthyr)
Donelan, Captain A. Mooney, John J. Tomkinson, James
Doogan, P. C. Morgan, J. Lloyd (Carmarthen) Toulmin, George
Douglas, Charles M. (Lanark) Murphy, John Trevelyan, Charles Philips
Ellis, John Edward (Notts.) Nannetti, Joseph P. Warner, Thomas Courtenay T.
Evans, Samuel T. (Glamorgan) Nolan, Joseph (Louth, South) Wason, Eugene (Clackmannan)
Farquharson, Dr. Robert O'Brien, Patrick (Kilkenny) White, George (Norfolk)
Fenwick, Charles O'Brien, P. J. (Tipperary, N.) White, Luke (York, E. R.)
Flavin, Michael Joseph O'Connor, James (Wicklow, W.) Whiteley, George (York, W. R.)
Flynn, James Christopher O'Donnell, John (Mayo, S.) Whitley, J. H. (Halifax)
Foster, Sir Walter (Derby Co.) O'Donnell, T. (Kerry, W.) Williams, Osmond (Merioneth)
Freeman-Thomas, Captain F. O'Dowd, John Wilson, John (Durham, Mid.)
Fuller, J. M. F. O'Kelly, Jas. (Roscommon, N.) Woodhouse, Sir J. T. (Huddersf'd)
Gilhooly, James O'Malley, William Young, Samuel
Gladstone, Rt Hn. Herbert John O'Mara, James
Griffith, Ellis J. Partington, Oswald TELLERS FOR THE NOES—Mr. Goddard and Mr. Runciman.
Harmsworth, R. Leicester Power, Patrick Joseph
Hayden, John Patrick Priestley, Arthur
Hayter, Rt. Hn. Sir Arthur D. Rea, Russell

And, it being after Midnight, the Chairman left the Chair to make his Report to the House.

Resolution to be reported upon Monday next; Committee to sit again upon Monday next.

Back to
Forward to