HC Deb 17 March 1903 vol 119 cc1000-3

Resolutions reported from the Committee.

1. "That, in the case of the Watford and Edgware Railway Bill, Petition for dispensing with Standing Order 129 in the case of the Petition of Hubert Von Herkomer' against the Bill, the said Standing Order ought to be dispensed with."

2. "That, in the case of the Thames River Steamboat Service, Petition for Bill, the Standing Ordesr ought to be I dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that Clause 27 be struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

3. "That, in the case of the Coventry Electric Tramways Bill, Petition for additional Provision, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to introduce their additional Provision if the Committee on the Bill think fit."

4. "That, in the case of the South Staffordshire Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 1A, and 1B be struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

5. "That, in the case of the Wakefield and District Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramway No. 1 be struck out of the Bill, unless the consent of the Ardsley East and West District Council be proved before the Committee on the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

6. "That, in the case of the Tynemouth and District Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 1A, 1B, 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 5A, 5B, 6, and 7 be struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

7. "That, in the case of the Shepshed Urban District Gas Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill."

8. "That, in the case of the South Lancashire Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 3 and 4 be struck out of the Bill, unless the consent of the Atherton Urban District Council be proved before the Committee on the Bill: That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

9. "That in the case of the Macclesfield and District Electric Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13A, 17, and 17A be struck out of the Bill:— That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

10. "That, in the case of the Hove, Worthing, and District Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 be struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

11. "That, in the case of the Manchester Southern Tramways (Cheshire) Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 2, and 3 be struck out of the Bill, unless the necessary consents of the local and road authorities be proved before the Committee on the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

12. "That, in the case of the Manchester Southern Tramways (Lancashire) Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with;—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 2, 7, 8, and 9 be struck out of the Bill, unless the necessary consents of the local and road authorities to the said Tramways be proved before the Committee on the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

13. "That, in the case of the Gosport, Fareham, and Cosham Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 be struck out of the Bill, unless the necessary consents of the local and road authorities be proved before the Committee on the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."

14. "That, in the case of the Hammer smith, City, and North-East London Railway, Petition for leave to deposit a Petition for Bill, the Standing Orders ought not to be dispensed with."

First thirteen resolutions agreed to.

Report to lie upon the Table.