HC Deb 07 April 1903 vol 120 cc1239-41
SIR EDWARD STRACHEY

To ask Mr. Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will give the names of the ports of embarkation and debarkation of fresh milk, and of preserved milk other than condensed, imported into the United Kingdom during the year 1902, together with the names and addresses of the persons to whom such milk was consigned; also whether he will give the amount of fat and non-fatty solids in the samples of such imported milk analysed in 1902, and the dates on which such samples were taken.

(Answered by Mr. Ritchie.) I do not think it would be desirable to give the names and addresses of the persons referred to, but the names of the ports of debarkation and embarkation are as follows:—

Date of Sampling. Description of milk. Results of Analysis.
Percentage of Fat. Percentage of Non-Fatty Solids.
10th February Separated .20 9.06
26th February Sterilised 2.91 8.47
7th March Sterilised 1.89 9.07
10th March Separated .20 0.12
26th May Sterilised 3.00 8.85
24th June Fresh 2.83 8.80
25th June Sterilised 2.60 9.34
15th September Fresh 3.12 9.65
20th November Fresh 4.60 9.28
16th December Fresh 4.00 9.28

Fresh milk imported in 1902—

Ports of Debarkation. Ports of Embarkation.
London Rotterdam
Harwich Rotterdam
Hull Amsterdam
Southampton Cherbourg
Havre
Honfleur

Preserved milk (other than condensed) imported in 1902—

Ports of Debarkation. Ports of Embarkation.
London Riga
London Drammen
London Harlingen
London Rotterdam
London Amsterdam
London Ostend
London Boulogne
London Genoa
London Sydney
London Brisbane
London New York
Liverpool New York
Liverpool Boston
Folkestone Boulogne
Grimsby Hamburg
Grimsby Antwerp
Harwich Rotterdam
Harwich Antwerp
Hull Christiania
Hull Amsterdam
Newcastle Copenhagen
Newcastle Stavanger
Newhaven Dieppe
Southampton Amsterdam
Southampton New York
Southampton Havre
Southampton Honfleur
Glasgow Antwerp
Grangemouth Amsterdam
Leith Rotterdam
Leith Amsterdam

The results of analyses of samples of fresh milk and preserved milk (other than condensed) taken by the Customs during 1902 were as follows—

In addition, a sample of frozen milk was taken on 13th January, but as it was found not to have been properly drawn, the analysis was not completed. The samples taken on the 26th February and 24th June, although deficient in fat, were not so reported to the Customs Department, the condition of the samples when received being such as to raise a doubt whether they truly represented the bulk as imported. The samples taken on the 7th March and 25th June were the subject of proceedings against the importers, as stated by me in answer to the hon. Member's previous Question on the 10th of March last.†