§ Lords' Amendments considered.
§ *(12.5.) MR. CREMER (Shoreditch, Haggerston)said he had no serious objections to the Lords' Amendments, but he intended to divide the House as a protest against the action of the promoters of the Bill in rendering the measure practically useless. The Bill had been greatly improved by the Standing Committee, but it had since been emasculated and made worthless by the promoters weakly yielding to a single protest speech made on the other side, and striking out of the Bill Subsection C of Clause 1. The Bill was now useless, and of no more value than the paper upon which it is printed.
§ Lords' Amendments agreed to.