§ Resolutions reported from the Committee—
- 1. "That, in the case of the London United Tramways Petition, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with; That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 8 be struck out of the Bill; That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such order has been complied with."
- 2. "That, in the case of the South Wales Electrical Power Distribution Bill, Petition for additional provision, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with; That the parties be permitted to introduce their additional provision provided the Committee on the Bill think fit."
- 3. "That, in the case of the London County Council (General Powers) Bill, Petition for dispensing with Standing Order 129 in the case of the Petition of the 'Metropolitan Registered Lodging House Keepers' Association, and Registered Lodging House Keepers in the Metropolis 'against the Bill, the said Standing Order ought to be dispensed with."
- 4 "That, in the case of the Newcastle-upon-Tyne Corporation Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with; That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramway No. 11 be struck out of the Bill: That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."
- 5. "That, in the case of the South Shields. Sunderland, and District Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with; That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill."
- 6. "That, in the case of the Exeter and District Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with; That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, and 10, and so much of Tramways Nos. 2 and 3 as lie within the boundaries of the city of
5 Exeter, be struck out of the Bill; That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with." - 7. "That, in the case of the Birmingham and Midland Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with: That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramway No. 1 be struck out of the Bill, and that the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 7, 7A, 8, 9, 9A, and 9B, be struck out of the Bill, unless the consent of the Oldbury Urban District Council be proved before the Committee on the Bill; That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."
- 8. "That, in the case of the Hastings Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with: That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided the powers for the proposed extension tramway be struck out of the Bill; That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."
- 9. "That, in the ease of the Mexborough and Swinton Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with; That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill."
§ Resolutions agreed to.