HC Deb 12 March 1901 vol 90 cc1323-4

Resolutions reported from the Committee:—

  1. 1. "That, in the case of the Cowes Ferry Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill."
  2. 2. "That, in the case of the London, Tilbury, and Southend Railway Bill, Petition for additional Provision, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to 1324 introduce their additional Provision, if the Committee on the Bill think fit."
  3. 3. "That, in the case of the Birmingham (City) Tramways Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the powers to construct Tramways Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4. and 5 be struck out of the Bill, unless the consent of the local and road authorities shall be proved before the Committee on the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."
  4. 4. "That, in the case of the Mersey Docks and Harbour Board (Canada Dock Works, etc.) Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that the power to enable the promoting Board to purchase 500 acres of land for future dock development be struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."
  5. 5. "That, in the case of the Tyneside Tramways and Tramroads Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that Tramway No. 3 be struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."
  6. 6. "That, in the case of the Harrogate Corporation Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, provided that Clause 7 be struck out of the Bill:—That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."
  7. 7. "That, in the case of the Sutton-in-Ashfield Urban District (Water) Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with:—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill."

Forward to