HC Deb 13 May 1858 vol 150 cc530-1
THE CHANCELLOR OF WE EXCHEQUER

said, it would be convenient if the right hon. Gentleman the Member for the City of Oxford would state in what form he meant to bring forward his Motion to-morrow—whether as an Amendment on the Motion for going into Committee of Supply, or as a substantive Motion, because in the latter case he (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) should have to move that it take precedence of the Orders of the day,

MR. CARDWELL

said, he felt indebted to the right hon. Gentleman for affording him the opportunity of bringing on his Motion before the Orders of the Day. It was as a substantive Motion that he meant to introduce it, and it stood in the Order Book in that shape.

MR. MILNER GIBSON

Is the Motion to be made in the same words in which it stands there?

MR. CARDWELL

Exactly the same.

THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER

said, he would now give notice that to-morrow he should move that the notice of Motion of the right hon. Gentleman (Mr. Cardwell) should take precedence of the Orders of the Day.,