§ Mr. Whitbread, as he had understood from the Chancellor of the Exchequer, that public business was expected, at this period of the session, to commence at a quarter past four, concluded from not seeing the noble lord (Castlereagh) in his place at that time (between five and six), that it was not likely they would see him there before Monday. He must, however, put a question respecting a paper purporting to be a proclamation issued by the Duke of Wellington, which he expected would be proved to be a forgery. A statement to this effect he had supposed would be made before the discussion on the expected Message took place. It was necessary that it should be disavowed; for though it was certainly destitute of all appearance of authenticity, it had caused a considerable sensation in the public mind. Feeling this, he now rose to ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if the paper in question was a true proclamation, issued by the Duke of Wellington or not.
§ Mr. Wellesley Polewished distinctly to 276 answer that ministers had not the slightest reason to consider the proclamation referred to an authentic document, nor had they any grounds to suppose that up to the present moment the Duke of Wellington had issued any proclamation at all.
§ Mr. Hornersaid, he had a motion to make, which he had wished to submit to the House in the presence of the noble lord (Castlereagh), but which he felt it necessary to bring forward now. After what had appeared in some of the foreign journals, the House must feel it was impossible for him not to call their attention to certain papers which had been read by the noble lord on a former night, which had produced a strong impression, not on his mind certainly, but on the House, Which papers were now declared to be forgeries and fabrications. It was impossible for any man in that House to doubt, that when the noble lord read the documents alluded to, he believed them to be genuine; but a charge had been made in the face of Europe—it might turn out that the charge would recoil on those by whom it was made—of such a nature, that he thought it impossible for that House not to feel itself called upon to ascertain the true character of the papers which had been communicated to them, as far as they had the means of doing so. In the absence of the noble lord, he would not describe the impression which the recent publication had made on his mind. Without going further into the subject he must observe, that there were two documents referred to in the French papers, which he thought, if at all in existence, must be in the office of the Foreign Department. One was a letter from the French minister, count Blacas, transmitting three letters to the Foreign minister of this country, and the other was the letter of the Duke of Wellington, said to be dated January the 4th, 1815, which contained a statement of his opinion on certain documents submitted to him relative to the conduct of Marshal Murat. He hoped the House would order the production of these two papers. If the letter of the Duke of Wellington were genuine, it could be produced with little delay, and the other document which he wished to see laid on the table, might also, he apprehended, be immediately forthcoming, as it must be in the possession of the noble lord. He then moved for the production, of a letter from count Blacas to lord Castlereagh, transmitting certain docu- 277 ments relative to the conduct of Marshal Murat, together with a letter from the Duke of Wellington on the same subject.
The Chancellor of the Exchequerhoped, in the absence of his noble friend, the hon. and learned gentleman would suffer his motion to remain in the hands of the Speaker, as a notice of a motion for a future day. He had parted from his noble friend no longer ago than at four o'clock, when he left him preparing to come down to the House. He had expected him up to that moment, and surmised from his absence, that unexpected business of importance had detained him. His noble friend, he doubted not would feel it to be his duty to communicate to the House all the information he possessed on the subject which had been brought under their consideration. The Chancellor of the Exchequer said he believed the letter of the duke of Wellington, which had appeared in the French papers, to be a genuine letter, but the opinion it expressed was not founded on the documents which his noble friend had communicated to the House; and the impression on the mind of the duke of Wellington with respect to the conduct of Marshal Murat, had experienced a complete change, when those documents to which he had last referred were laid before him. With respect to the statement contained in the foreign journals—it did not strike him that a charge of having forged the papers in question was set up against the ministers of this country; but it appeared that the French Government, for its own purposes, had represented certain persons in the Royal Government to have garbled the documents to which they had access, in order to make them such as should produce an undue impression on the minds of those to whom they were communicated. This was an explanation which he felt anxious to make.
§ Mr. Hornersaid, he had not stated that the fabrication of the documents in question had been charged on this country. Every one who read the French papers must see that it was against the Royal Government of France. On the statement made by the right hon. gentleman, that his noble colleague would be anxious to give the House every information in his power on the subject which he had brought forward, he felt disposed to concur with the suggestion of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and to suffer his motion to be considered but as a notice for Mon- 278 day, on which day he should certainly again bring the question under the consideration of the House.—The conversation was here considered to be at an end, when lord Castlereagh entered.—Mr. Homer then said, that seeing the noble, lord in his place, he thought it might be desirable that he should now make him acquainted with the statement which he had made in his absence. He then shortly repeated his former speech, and described the motion which he had made, and the manner in which it had been proposed to dispose of it.
Lord Castlereaghwas disposed to express his acknowledgments to the hon. and learned gentleman for the early opportunity he had afforded him of offering some explanation on the publication which had been made in another country; but if the hon. and learned gentleman had delayed bringing this subject before the House, till the papers now printing were produced, it was probable that in them, he would have found much of the information he wanted. The letter of the duke of Wellington, dated January 4, 1814, was a perfectly correct paper, but the opinion expressed therein applied to documents totally different from those which he had communicated to the House. It was certainly true, that some papers relative to the conduct of Murat were found, and communicated to the duke of Wellington, before he last left Paris, and the answer which he had given proved that there was no disposition on his part, as the servant of the English Government, hastily to decide against Murat, on charges which were not borne out by facts. The opinion he (the duke of Wellington) then expressed, was founded on documents totally distinct from those which had subsequently been obtained. Those which he (lord Castlereagh) had communicated, had been discovered on the interval which passed between the duke of Wellington's arrival at Vienna, and his (lord Castlereagh's) leaving Paris and arriving in London. These documents had been forwarded to him officially by the French minister, regularly certified. It was said that these papers had been falsified. There were in all eight letters, five of which were genuine beyond dispute. The only documents in which a question could be raised, were the three letters of Buonaparté, which had been found, not as the others were, but in the only state in which such docu 279 ments could be found, in the form of copies or drafts of letters, to be sent to the persons to whom they were addressed. Count Blacas in taking copies of these had not been content with the precaution of getting them regularly certified in the official way; he hail not stopped there, but that there might be no chance of their being mislaid, or of their not being forthcoming at any time, he had delivered the originals into the hands of the ministers of the Two Sicilies, prince Castelcicala. He (lord Castlereagh) had seen the minister of the Two Sicilies that morning, and had examined the originals of the papers of which he had received certified copies from count Blacas. Respecting five of them, no doubt whatever could be entertained of their being genuine. These clearly established the fact that Murat, endeavouring to manage for himself, was equally false to Buonaparté and the Allies. The last of these letters was completely proved to be genuine by the official letter of general Clarke, and enough was here proved to establish the only charge which had been preferred against Murat. When on investigation it was found, that the character attempted to be given to these documents was only a part of the system which the present French Government was acting upon when their proceedings in other respects, and their fabricated proclamations of the duke of Wellington were taken into consideration, it must be seen, that the effort made to induce the people of France to believe those documents to be forgeries, was one of the expedients which was thought necessary to induce that deluded nation to determine for that desperate course which was necessary for the support of the ambition of that man, now unhappily at the head of it. The opinion first pronounced by the duke of Wellington on the documents submitted to him, ought, if any thing, to strengthen the presumption, that there was no undue disposition on the part of the Government of England hastily to form an unfavourable judgment on the actions of Murat. When those documents which he (lord Castlereagh) had subsequently received, were officially transmitted to the duke of Wellington at Vienna, his answer was very different from that which he had formerly made. He then said—"After receiving such undoubted proofs of the treachery of Murat, he could no longer retain his former opinion. He had submitted the documents to the allied Sove- 280 reigns, who had no doubt on the subject, and were convinced they owed it to their own security to put it out of his power to act such a part by them again, and an attack on him was accordingly determined upon." But if all these documents were suffered to go for nothing, Murat's case would not be much improved, considering the events which had recently taken place; as he, in the spirit of his former treachery, had actually made an attack upon the Allies, before they had attempted to carry their resolution into effect. He repeated it, that the letter of the duke of Wellington was a genuine document, but founded on papers wholly distinct from those which he (lord Castlereagh) had submitted to the House. Of those documents last referred to, five were genuine beyond all doubt, and especially that of the Viceroy, which he (lord Castlereagh) had seen that morning, and he thought he himself knew enough of the hand-writing of that person to be able to pronounce on the authenticity of that document. The only three documents on which a doubt could be raised were papers which could not have been found in any other form than that in which they had been discovered; and the attempt to falsify them from circumstances, ought only to be regarded as a lame attempt of the present Government of France to dispose the people to further the ambitious views of Buonaparté. Count Blacas could have no motive for forging the three documents in question, when all that he wished to show was more than proved by the other papers, on which no question could be raised. The letter of the duke of Wellington he had been made acquainted with when he was at Vienna. He thought a copy of it had been sent to him there, but of this he was not certain. If it was desired, it could easily be produced; but for the purpose of discussion, he was prepared to admit the copy of it which had appeared in the French papers to be genuine.
§ Mr. Hornersaid, that much of the matter of the noble lord's speech was quite extraneous, as the question, whether the course which had been pursued with respect to Murat was or was not justified, was not the subject of this day's debate. The papers which the noble lord had brought before the House, it should appear, had not been in the possession of the French Government, or at least they had not known they were in possession of 281 them, or if they did, had not thought them worth laying before the duke of Wellington so lately as in January last. It was important to know whether none of these letters were among the papers, on which his first opinion was founded. Whatever might be the weight of his ultimate decision, it must depend much on this question. It was said, that of eight letters which had been brought before Parliament, five were genuine beyond all doubt. But if three should prove fabrications, he should not think the authenticity of the others beyond all doubt, because the detection of their falsehood was not yet complete. The noble lord had too correct an understanding not to be sensible of this, that if three fabricated letters had been imposed upon him, the other five which were derived from the same source could not be depended upon—he could have no reliance on them. The question now before the House was not as to the good or bad conduct of Murat, but related solely to the authenticity of the documents which had been laid before Parliament. On this subject it had been satisfactory to him to find the noble lord anxious (as indeed he had expected he would be) to keep pace with his wishes, to outrun them indeed, in giving that information on the business which had become necessary. With respect to the papers, however, which had already been ordered, as the House had been kept waiting for them seventeen days, considering the period of the session at which they had arrived, he could not but think an unreasonable delay had taken place.
Lord Castlereaghsaid, he had not meant, in what he had said, to throw any blame on the conduct of the hon. and learned gentleman; on the contrary, he had expressed gratitude to him for the early opportunity afforded him of giving that explanation which he thought necessary. He did not believe that any culpable delay had taken place on the part of the officers charged with the execution of the former order of the House for the production of papers; but the voluminous nature of them, added to the circumstance of many of them having to be translated, had necessarily caused a considerable portion of time to elapse before they could be produced. As to the questions of the hon. and learned gentleman respecting the documents on which the opinion of the Duke of Wellington had been founded, 282 he (lord Castlereagh) thought they had both a common interest in throwing a light on that subject; but he could rather have wished that the hon. and learned gentleman had not seemed to prefer giving his confidence to the statement made on the other side of the water, rather than to that which had been put forth on this side of it. Knowing the character of the two Governments, he should have hoped he would not have supposed the English ministers most likely to present a garbled statement to the world. With respect to the documents which had been produced, he again contended that five of the eight were genuine beyond all dispute; and he could not bring himself to believe that the other three were fabrications. From the inspection of the originals, he was convinced the fraud was too elaborate to have been so successfully accomplished. If the hon. and learned gentleman wished to see these documents, he (lord Castlereagh) thought he could procure him a sight of them; and he thought that would convince him they were no forgeries, and that he would thence be led to conclude that the attempt to falsify them was no other than an attempt of the present French Government, to build a fraud on them, by pretending one to have been built on them by the government of Louis 18.
§ Mr. Hornersaid, with respect to the insinuation which had been thrown out by the noble lord, as to his readiness to credit the statements made on the other side of the water, he had only to assure him, that satisfied that his character was known to the House, he should treat it with the most perfect indifference.
§ Mr. Tierneywished to know if the noble lord had not officially received a copy of the Duke of Wellington's letter at Vienna, and if he could not produce that copy? Could the noble lord state that none of the five genuine letters were among the documents on which that letter was founded?
Lord Castlereaghwas willing to produce the document, if it was in his possession. He distinctly recollected being told at Vienna, that certain documents respecting the conduct of Murat had been submitted to the Duke of Wellington, and also that he had been informed of the answer which he had given. He did not know if the letter was now in his office; but he admitted that which had been published to be genuine. He considered the docu- 283 merits on which the opinion expressed in that letter was founded, to be altogether different from those recently brought before the House.
§ Mr. Tierneythought it possible that some of the five documents, said to be undoubtedly genuine, were among those on which the first opinion of the Duke of Wellington was founded.
Lord Castlereaghhad not understood any of those documents to have been at that time submitted to him.
§ Mr. Tierneywished to know if the noble lord had seen the documents which were submitted to him?
Lord Castlereaghsaid, that documents on which no case could be founded be had considered to be very unimportant for him to see.
§ Sir James Mackintosh, if he understood what had just fallen from the noble lord, thought some of the five documents might have been among those which were laid before the Duke of Wellington. Was the noble lord prepared to say that he knew what those documents were? If he could say this, and that none of the five were among them, it certainly would be very important.
Lord Castlereaghstated, that the three documents which were last found in the archives, were not discovered till after he had left Paris. Surprise had been expressed at papers being thus found from time to time; but this had arisen, as he had been informed by the French Government, from the circumstances of the documents being very numerous in the archives, and consequently consuming much time in the examination. All were in the possession of the Government in January last, though from the length of time taken up by the search, they could not be discovered at that period.
§ Mr. Hornersaid, the noble lord would do him the justice to acknowledge, that On the night when these documents were first brought forward, he had doubted their authenticity, without waiting for the statement that might be put forth from the other side of the water. It had particularly struck him, that it was highly improbable the Setter dated from Nangis should be found at Paris.
Lord Castlereaghcertainly admitted that the hon. and learned gentleman had expressed a doubt on the subject; but at the same time it had appeared to him, that an impression was made upon his mind, as well as on the House in general, 284 that there was internal evidence of the letters being genuine. There was, indeed, that in the documents in question, that he must confess, had they come to him in a Less satisfactory manner than on the authority of the minister of a crowned head, his suspicion would not have been so much alive as it would on many occasions.
§ Mr. Hornersaid, it was clear from what had recently transpired, that they both were right as to the internal evidence which some of the letters bore of coming from the pen to which they were ascribed.
§ The question was then put, and the motion agreed to.