Procedure Browser Librarian mode

Committee recommendations

There are 40 steps.

Download CSV

A step forms part of a procedure to which a work package may be subject.

Step Actualisation count
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended a debate on a substantive motion take place during period A (House of Commons) 2
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended a general debate (House of Commons) 0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended that objection period A be extended (House of Commons) 0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons) 0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended the treaty should not be ratified (House of Commons) 0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) reported the instrument is not appropriate to be made (House of Commons) 0
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee reported the instrument is not appropriate to be made (House of Commons) 0
Concerns raised by the Business and Trade Committee (BTC) (House of Commons) 0
Concerns raised by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee (House of Commons) 0
Concerns raised by the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee (DPRRC) (House of Lords) 0
Concerns raised by the Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) (House of Commons) 0
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee (DPRRC) reported the instrument is not appropriate to be made (House of Lords) 1
Drawn to the special attention of the House by the European Union Committee (House of Lords) 16
Drawn to the special attention of the House by the International Agreements Committee (IAC) (House of Lords) 26
Drawn to the special attention of the House by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) (House of Commons and House of Lords) 1
Drawn to the special attention of the House by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords) 497
Drawn to the special attention of the House by the Select Committee on Statutory Instruments (SCSI) (House of Commons) 73
Drawn to the special attention of the Houses by the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) (House of Commons and House of Lords) 772
Energy Security and Net Zero Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons) 0
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee made recommendations about how the treaty should be implemented (House of Commons) 1
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee made recommendations about what lessons could be learnt for future treaties (House of Commons) 1
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee recommended a general debate (House of Commons) 0
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons) 0
European Statutory Instruments Committee (ESIC) recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons) 57
Foreign Affairs Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure 0
Home Affairs Committee recommended a debate take place during period A (House of Commons) 1
Home Affairs Committee recommended the House be able to record its view as to whether the treaty should be ratified (House of Commons) 1
Home Affairs Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons) 0
Information paragraph provided by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords) 2009
International Agreements Committee (IAC) scrutiny report of government negotiation objectives (House of Lords) 2
International Trade Committee (ITC) scrutiny report of government negotiation objectives (House of Commons) 2
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons) 0
Recommendations made by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords) 0
Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) reported the instrument is not appropriate to be made (House of Commons) 0
Reported for information by the European Affairs Committee (EAC) (House of Lords) 2
Reported for information by the International Agreements Committee (IAC) (House of Lords) 75
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons) 0
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) makes recommendations on published draft (House of Lords) 3
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Lords) 54
Transport Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons) 1

Step collection identifier

https://id.parliament.uk/pOJcdzzC

SPARQL queries used by this page