§ Mr. Arthur Lewisasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department 198W whether he is aware of the present situation where a person who knowingly and persistently breaks the law is given a nominal penalty of a very small fine, whereas another person who by accident inadvertently breaks the law is given a very severe penalty for a relatively minor offence; and whether, when reviewing the question of criminal justice, he will take steps to see that the penalty for breaking the law fits the seriousness of the crime committed.
§ Mr. Elystan MorganThe maximum penalties available to the courts are kept under review and in my view are in general adequate. The use made of them is a matter for the courts' discretion.
§ Mr. Arthur Lewisasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he is aware of the growing practice of persons regularly and continuously refusing to pay first, second and third penalties of fines imposed by courts and then further action by the authorities ceasing; and what action he proposes to take to prevent this persistent and flagrant contempt of the law.
§ Mr. Elystan MorganI have no evidence to bear out this suggestion. The enforcement of fines is a matter within the discretion of the courts, who are aware of the need for vigorous action.