§ 1. Mr. David Amess (Southend, West) (Con)
If she will make a statement on the funding of sports facilities from lottery funds. 
§ The Minister for Sport and Tourism (Mr. Richard Caborn)
Lottery funding continues to transform sports provision, but, as everybody knows, receipts are falling, so the Government are reforming Sport England to ensure that lottery money is most effectively used. Facilities and other funding will be based on sport's own priorities and have a true regional focus. The driving force for that will be greater sustainable participation in sport and physical activities.
§ Mr. Amess
For too long, my constituency of Southend, West has languished in the bottom group of beneficiaries from lottery funds despite the excellent quality of the many applications that have been made. Will the Minister explain why, two years ago, the Government indicated that £750 million from the New Opportunities Fund would be fast-tracked to sport, yet only £230 million has found its Nay to our schools, of which only £8.5 million has actually been spent?
§ Mr. Caborn
Under the six-year programme, £581 million of the £750 million is to be invested, through local education authorities, in sports facilities. We are the first to admit that, had Sport England been up to it —unfortunately, it was not—we should have invested through that medium. Over the past two years, I have been engaged in the reform programme for Sport England. which will work through the governing bodies and the new regional sports boards; the 75 local and regional funding streams have been transformed and the 1224 process will be much more bottom-up, influenced by sport, as well as by people in the regions and in the governing bodies.
§ John Cryer (Hornchurch) (Lab)
The Minister may be aware that my Hornchurch constituency has done extremely badly from lottery funding for the kind of facilities referred to in the question. Will he give an assurance that future bids from Hornchurch and from the London borough of Havering will be looked at fairly and, preferably, approved?
§ Mr. Caborn
Overall, the Department and the distributors have been trying to ensure that lottery funding is much more sensitive to local needs and that distribution is fairer. As I said in my previous answer, sports governing bodies and the regional sports boards will be the major distributors of the money, to ensure that we respond to the needs of sport and of community development Sport England will be the community platform from which schemes will be developed.
§ Mr. Nick Hawkins (Surrey Heath) (Con)
Does not the Minister recognise that the Government have removed sport's legitimate expectations from the lottery? When they took office, they reduced the proportion of lottery money going to sport, but made sure that lottery money went to many unpopular causes, including the National Coalition of Anti-Deportation Campaigns. As a result, there has been much less lottery money for sport, and the Minister's answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Southend, West (Mr. Amess), who pointed out that only £8 million of the £750 million promised three years ago has been spent, shows that the Government have no idea about joined-up thinking. The money that sport was led to expect it would get is tied up in red tape in the Department for Education and Skills. It should have been given to Sport England and delivered to sport—the Government have broken their promise.
§ Mr. Caborn
When the hon. Gentleman reflects on his question, he will find that it has many contradictions. Sport England receives 16.7 per cent. of lottery funds and the New Opportunities Fund receives about 33 per cent. A considerable amount of that money has been invested in sport. The £750 million for local education authorities to which the hon. Gentleman refers is actually going into sports facilities—
§ Mr. Caborn
It certainly is getting there. The hon. Gentleman should have been in the constituency of my hon. Friend the Member for Elmet (Colin Burgon) last Friday and seen the all-weather pitches and the developments for tennis and basketball in Dronfield, just outside Sheffield. Over the next 18 months to two years, 1,700 schemes will be coming on stream as a result of New Opportunities Fund investment in new sports facilities.
§ Mr. Lindsay Hoyle (Chorley) (Lab)
Will my right hon. Friend ensure that better funding is spread throughout the north-west? In Chorley, we have a very 1225 good athletics club but a running track is much needed. How much funding can be made available through Sport England for that scheme?
§ Mr. Caborn
When I took this job, we had 75 different funding streams. We have acted in an adult way and taken a systematic approach, involving those responsible for sportx2014;the governing bodies—and the new sports boards, which have a much wider constituency than had previously been the case, and the funding will be invested strategically and systematically. I am sure that my hon. Friend will make strong representations to Andy Worthington, the chair of the new north-west regional sports board, who will listen to the case so as to ensure that the scheme is delivered within the time scale that my hon. Friend wants.
§ Mr. James Gray (North Wiltshire) (Con)
At the Labour party conference in September 2000—some four years ago—the Prime Minister said:Today we set out plans to invest £750 millioninthree years".By anyone's standards, the Labour party conference in 2000, plus three, gives 2003 and £750 million. In 2002, the Minister said in a very fine speech that he once made:I wantit to happenby the summer."—[Official Report, 1 March 2002; Vol. 380, c. 999.]However, in a written answer in the House of Lords on 8 January this year, the Government were forced to admit that they had allocated £750 million, that they had so far committed £230 million, but that only £8 million had been spent, despite the Prime Minister's promise in 2000. When will he start putting his money where his mouth is?
§ Mr. Caborn
I am not taking lectures from that lot opposite, who were closing 40 playing fields a month when we came to power and had no sports strategy at all. We are spending £750 million, but we happen to be just a little bit behind schedule, so it is a bit rich of Conservative Members to criticise us.
§ Mr. Dennis Skinner (Bolsover) (Lab)
The Minister should not worry too much about the Tories, who gave £13 million towards the Churchill papers. I want to draw his attention back to the baths at Bolsover. I know that he is dealing with Chorley, Sheffield and all those other places, but will he give me an assurance about the proposal to save the baths at Bolsover—a declining area following the pit closures? The last bath was closed because of subsidence. We have got a first-class case. Do not bother about that lot over there—bother about Bolsover.
§ Mr. Caborn
I assure my hon. Friend that the east midlands sport board will take on board his interesting point. Many of the sports facilities in his constituency and, indeed, in those of many of my other hon. Friends were developed through the pits and the big steelworks. Many of those facilities were lost, but, as my hon. Friend suggests, we are trying to bring them back into community use. In fact, that investment in the 1226 community is governed by the community. I will take what he says to the east midlands sports board, and we will discuss it again.