§ Madam SpeakerI would like to make a short statement, for the guidance of hon. Members and others outside the House, about the use of the House emblem.
The crowned portcullis has been used for many years as the emblem of the House of Commons. It is a royal badge and its use by the House has now been formally authorised by licence granted by her Majesty the Queen.
The use of the emblem has been authorised for display on official stationery, publications and circulars, furniture and furnishings used in the Palace of Westminster, souvenir objects and books sold on the premises and club clothing. In addition, I am authorised to give my permission for similar uses of the emblem that indicate authorisation by or connection with the House.
It is important for the dignity of the House that the emblem should not be used for purposes to which such authentication is inappropriate, or where there is a risk that its use might wrongly be regarded or represented as having the authority of the House.
All Members of the House have a duty to ensure that the emblem is not misused. For my part, I intend to use my authority to give permission for its use only sparingly. I am aware that the emblem is currently in use by the media in a number of contexts concerned with coverage of our affairs. Such use makes a serious contribution to public understanding of Parliament, and I therefore regard it as appropriate that the House emblem should be used in those contexts. New uses will, however, require my authorisation, which will not be given if the use could possibly reflect adversely on the House or be misunderstood.
Finally, at this stage of the political cycle it is appropriate for me to remind Members that neither the crowned portcullis nor the royal arms, whether or not associated with the words "House of Commons", may be used to support the return of any person to public office. In case of doubt, Members should consult the Serjeant at Arms.