§ 9. Mr. JamiesonTo ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many public interest immunity certificates have been signed by Foreign Office Ministers since 1990. [860]
§ Mr. RifkindSeven.
§ Mr. JamiesonWill the Secretary of State assure the House that he and his Department will not be following 1187 the example set by his colleagues in the original Ordtech directors' trial, in which the right hon. Members for St. Albans (Mr. Lilley) and for Mole Valley (Mr. Baker) signed public interest immunity certificates to prevent information from landing in the hands of the directors' defence counsel, simply because, in the weeks leading up to the 1992 general election, that information would have proved at very best that the Government were turning a blind eye to the re-arming of Saddam Hussein?
§ Mr. RifkindThe hon. Gentleman is talking complete rubbish. As he well knows, public interest immunity certificates have existed for many years. Ministers do not have the last word on whether the documents covered by such certificates should be made available in a criminal trial. It is for the judge to decide, having taken into account the balance of public interest. That is the right and proper approach.