§ 20. Mr. Gordon PrenticeTo ask the Secretary of State for Transport what estimates he has made of the public subsidy likely to be required to (a) construct the channel tunnel rail link and (b) operate services on it. [15710]
§ Mr. WattsThe level of public sector support for the construction of the channel tunnel rail link will be determined by the competition currently under way to select a private sector promoter for the rail link. The Government do not intend to subsidise the private sector operation of international services.
§ Mr. PrenticeIs the Minister aware that Eurorail, whose chairman is Lord Parkinson, has put in a bid to construct the rail link? Is that not strange and remarkable 1384 behaviour from the noble Lord, given that he spiked the project five years ago, when he said that it should receive no public subsidy whatever?
§ Mr. WattsI do not find it in the least strange that any one of the four consortiums should have put in bids to build the link.
§ Mr. Jacques ArnoldBearing in mind the fact that the north Kent line is subsidised, along with the other commuter services in the London area, is not one advantage of the channel tunnel rail link that it will cut commuting speeds from Gravesend from 50 minutes to 19 minutes on the high-speed rail link?
§ Mr. WattsMy hon. Friend has pointed out one of the important domestic benefits that flow from the construction of that link.