§ 8. Mr. Mike O'BrienTo ask the Secretary of State for Transport what are his priorities in the roads programme for the west midlands.
§ Mr. MacGregorThe priorities are outlined in "Trunk Roads in England 1994 Review", which I announced to the House on 30 March.
§ Mr. O'BrienIs the Secretary of State aware that there is widespread opposition not only in north Warwickshire but throughout Staffordshire to the proposed Birmingham northern relief road? It is regarded as unnecessary, because it will not cure the congestion problems on the M6, and environmentally destructive because such orbital roads generate more traffic, which further damage the environment. That is why the proposal is opposed by large sections of the community throughout my area.
§ Mr. MacGregorI am aware of the hon. Gentleman's views. The forthcoming public inquiry will allow all representations to be heard by an independent inspector. That is the way to proceed with the scheme. The hon. 7 Gentleman will also know that a comprehensive assessment of the environmental effects of the proposed scheme is described in the environmental statement.
§ Mr. Anthony CoombsAlthough I recognise the importance of prioritising the road programme, is my right hon. Friend aware of the great concern that has been expressed in my constituency, in particular about the decision to make the Kidderminster-Blakedown and Hagley bypass one of the lowest priorities? Is he aware that it is supported by the local district councils and the chambers of commerce? Is he also aware that my constituents would like him to reconsider his decision and give that scheme the priority that it deserves?
§ Mr. MacGregorContrary to what Opposition Members may say, I know that there is a great demand for our road programme and that is why we are continuing with a major programme. Alas, there are so many requests from around the country that it is necessary to prioritise. Despite the high level of road building in which we are engaged, it is not possible to build all the roads at once or even within the next five or six years. That is why it has been necessary to say that some schemes will be delayed. The scheme to which my hon. Friend referred is connected with the western orbital route. I assure him that all schemes in the longer-term programme are secure and will go ahead as we continue to complete the schemes ahead of them.