HC Deb 31 January 1994 vol 236 cc632-3 4.13 pm
Madam Speaker

I wish to make a short statement to the House about the use, and abuse, of the House's emblem, the crowned portcullis. My remarks are cast in general terms and affect all Members equally.

Every Member receives a copy of the Members' handbook, which contains the following passage under the heading "Use of the House Emblem": The designs and symbols of the House should not be used for purposes to which such authentication is inappropriate, or where there is a risk that their use might wrongly be regarded, or represented, as having the authority of the House. The principal emblem of the House is the Crowned Portcullis. On 29 April 1981 the then Speaker made a statement to the House about a case of abuse of the emblem that had been referred to him as a contempt of the House. He said: I wish to make it clear to people outside the House, as well as to hon. Members, that the unauthorised use of the badge and name of the House of Commons is a serious matter. While he did not take any further action in that case, he added: Having given that public warning, I shall not be disposed to take as lenient a view of any future case brought to my notice." —[Official Report, 29 April 1981; Vol. 3, c. 789.] I judge that it is now appropriate to renew that warning. While it is one of the principal duties of the Speaker to uphold the dignity of the House, this is a responsibility undertaken equally by all of us when we have the honour of being elected to this place. Any intended use of the portcullis must be submitted for approval under the rules enforced, on my behalf, by the Serjeant at Arms and the Administration Committee, and no permission will be given if the use could possibly reflect adversely on the House, or be misunderstood.

I hope that I have made abundantly clear the importance I attach to this matter.