HC Deb 12 April 1994 vol 241 cc86-94

'The presumption in criminal law that the offences of murder and manslaughter shall occur only if the party wounded or hurt dies of the wound or hurt within a year and a day shall be abolished.'.—[Mr. Milburn.]

Brought up, and read the First time.

Mr. Alan Milburn (Darlington)

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

The clause has a straightforward purpose—to bring the law on murder into the 20th century. At present, the offence is governed by Judge Cook's antiquated 16th-century definition: When a man of sound memory unlawfully killeth any reasonable creature so as the party wounded dies of the wound or hurt within a year and a day after the same". That outdated definition has cost a family in my constituency the justice to which they were entitled following the tragic death of their son, Michael Gibson.

Michael suffered an unprovoked assault in Darlington town centre in April 1992, a month before his 21st birthday. As he walked along Darlington's High Row, he was savagely attacked by a passing stranger. He was hit only once, but it was enough. He remained comatose for the next 16 months, kept alive thanks only to the care and dedication of staff at Darlington memorial hospital.

Within a matter of hours, Michael's assailant, David Clark, had been arrested by local police. He was well known to them, having served recent sentences for burglary and actual bodily harm. Clark readily confessed that, after consuming 12 pints of lager, he had gone out looking for trouble that Friday evening. He found it in the shape of Michael Gibson.

But David Clark is a very lucky man. He is free today to roam the streets once again, thanks to an ancient law that takes no account of advances in medical technology.

The absurdities of the law as it stands mean quite simply that Michael Gibson took too long to die. According to a letter that I have received from Barbara Mills, the Director of Public Prosecutions: in the event of Michael having died within a year and a day of the assault upon him, Mr. Clark would have been charged with an offence of manslaughter. The Crown Prosecution Service even waited for 366 days before bringing Clark to court, but once the year and a day had passed, it was left with no alternative but to bring a charge of grievous bodily harm against David Clark. He received a two-year sentence. He was released from prison just nine weeks after Michael Gibson finally died, in August 1993.

It is little wonder that Michael's mother, Pat Gibson, has earned the support of people throughout the north-east of England for her campaign to scrap this antiquated rule. She has to live with the knowledge that, if her son had been attacked just 150 miles further north—in Scotland—her son's killer would face life imprisonment, because the rule simply does not apply there. Nor does it apply in any other European country apart from Cyprus. She said of her son's killer: I thought the law and justice would take care of him. But the law has simply aided and abetted him in getting away with it. Pat Gibson is right. The law protected the guilty, because it had been outstripped by medical science. Today, patients can be kept alive for many years, thanks to all the advances in life-saving and life-enhancing medical technology. There are now some 1,200 patients in England alone who are believed to be in a persistent vegetative state. No doubt many will be the victims of road traffic accidents, but a few will be the victims of assault.

I am aware of at least three other cases in which the 366-day rule has served to deny justice to the victims of crime and to their families. As the Minister conceded in Committee, the number of crime victims caught in this legal time warp is likely to increase as the frontiers of medicine are constantly pushed back.

He has, of course, expressed sympathy for the Gibson family, and that is very welcome. He even said in Committee that the 366-day rule was anachronistic. That is very welcome. What is less welcome is the fact that, for almost a year, he has ducked and dodged about making a final decision about the future of this outdated and unjust rule.

7.45 pm

I first wrote to the Home Secretary on 19 May last year, calling for a review of the 366-day rule. The Minister cannot claim this evening that he has not had enough time to assess the implications of change. He has had 11 months to conduct a review. Only now is he prepared to refer the issue to the Law Commission, but he still cannot say what sort of timetable or remit the Law Commission will have, or when it will report its conclusions to the House. That is simply not good enough.

The Minister said in Committee that the first clause that I tabled would have given rise to a new anachronism, because it did not cover manslaughter as well as murder. There can be no such excuses with new clause 15. It covers both, and has taken on board his concerns. It calls for the immediate abolition of a rule that is bringing the law into disrepute by failing properly to punish those who commit the most serious of offences on our statute book—murder.

Over recent months, we have all heard much from Ministers about getting tough on crime. The Minister himself has spoken eloquently about the need to return to common-sense principles in matters of crime and punishment. I can remind him that, just a month ago, he told the House: Our constituents are sick and tired of lengthy legal games letting the guilty go free on technicalities."—(Official Report, 2 March 1994; Vol. 238, c. 1054.] Tonight, Ministers have an opportunity to put those convictions into practice. Ministers can demonstrate that the commitment to justice and the right of victims come before retaining an ancient rule that has simply outlived its usefulness.

I urge all hon. Members this evening to support new clause 15.

Mr. Alex Carlile (Montgomery)

The rule to which the hon. Member for Darlington (Mr. Milburn) has referred is a rule which, when it was created, no doubt met the perception at that time of common sense. If somebody had recovered more than a year and a day after the trauma leading to their unconsciousness, it would have been regarded as a miracle of sanctifiable proportions.

But understandings have changed, and medical science, as the hon. Gentleman said, has moved on a good deal. One could not say that it was an everyday occurrence for somebody to recover more than a year and a day after becoming unconscious, but it is certainly relatively common for people to recover a measure of consciousness much more than a year after a traumatic incident.

During my years in legal practice, I have been involved as a barrister in a good many personal injury cases. I recall a number of cases in which children, particularly, who had the physical strength to remain alive while unconscious for a considerable time, have made—albeit part, but good part —recoveries from what appeared to be a persistent vegetative state. So science is very different from the understanding at the time that the rule was created.

That nobody can be prosecuted in 1994 for murder or manslaughter after a year and a day plainly makes an ass of the law. As every year passes, the position will seem ever more asinine, unless the Minister is prepared to concede that the time has now come for a change.

It is hardly a revolutionary change. I am given to understand that the law of Scotland does not involve a rule of this kind, and that it never has. I do not believe that life, at least in modern times, is held more cheaply in Scotland than it is in England and Wales. It is my view that what applies in Scotland in this regard should apply in England. There is a need for some uniformity in the law of murder and manslaughter within the countries of the United Kingdom. Indeed, I hope that we may see some harmonisation of these criminal laws throughout the European Union in due course.

Many issues affecting the law of murder and mánslaughter have been and are being considered by the Law Commission. I believe that fundamental changes should take place which go somewhat beyond this proposal. It should not await that wider consideration before being introduced. Many practising lawyers, such as myself, who have appeared in a great number of homicide cases, believe that the distinction between murder and manslaughter is now no longer sensible, and that the mandatory life sentence is no longer a realistic way of dealing with the vast range of facts that may arise in a homicide case. I accept that those issues may require wider and longer debate and possibly specific legislation, but this is an issue which the Government have had more than enough time to consider. The time for change has now arrived.

I applaud the proposal made by the hon. Member for Darlington and hope that we shall at last hear a positive response from the Minister.

Mr. Maclean

Of course I believe that people who kill should not escape the full force of the law because of a technicality. That has been my view, is my view and always will be my view.

I said in Committee that I was personally inclined to the view that abolition would turn out to be the sensible reform of the year-and-a-day rule in due course, and that also is still my view. I am not known as a person much given to sympathy for those who commit crime and I worry that the rule has outlived its usefulness, but I believe that simple abolition would create a vacuum in the way in which we treat those who may be liable to further prosecution having already been convicted of a lesser offence, if the victim goes on to die, or who may not have been prosecuted in the first place. We are, after all, talking about the most serious charge known to law in the same breath as we contemplate a potentially unlimited liability to prosecution in the future.

If the matter were really as straightforward as the hon. Member for Darlington (Mr. Milburn) suggests, why did the Criminal Law Revision Committee and the House of Lords Select Committee on murder and life imprisonment not leap instantly to the conclusion that the rule should be abolished? Instead, they recommended its retention.

As I said in Committee, the Law Commission had separately arrived at a decision to review the rule—not, I must point out to the hon. and learned Member for Montgomery (Mr. Carlile), as part of a long and wide-ranging review of all aspects of crime and punishment or murder, but as a separate, shorter, sharper review. Those of us who are familiar with the Law Commission's way of working will know that consultation is its key component, and that it would be foolish and wrong to expect the commission to forgo that element simply to beat a parliamentary deadline. In any event, it is not for me, the Government or the House to try to set timetables for the Law Commission.

I do not expect that the commission will produce its report in time for the Government to amend the Bill; still less would I presume to guarantee that the commission will come up with the same proposal as Opposition Members, or follow my own views on the matter. I can say, however, that the commission has been made well aware of the strength of feeling in the House and of the Government's concern.

That is why I believe that the Law Commission will take forward this difficult but discreet and limited task with urgency. I believe that the House should therefore reject this premature new clause with every confidence that the matter will be quickly and thoroughly dealt with by those who are expert in it.

Mr. Michael

I pay tribute to my hon. Friend the Member for Darlington (Mr. Milburn) for the way in which he has pursued the issue for a considerable time. I made the case on behalf of the Opposition in Committee, and I do not need to add to the arguments which stand in the record of the sittings of the Standing Committee of 3 March.

I remind the Minister of his words in response to our debate in Committee: The year and a day rule has outlived its usefulness, but we must tie up the loose ends. With reference to those loose ends, he asked: What happens if the rule is abolished for murder but the charge is later reduced for manslaughter?"—[0fficial Report, Standing Committee B. 3 March 1994; c. 1165] We have put that right, because new clause 15 deals with manslaughter as well as murder.

The Minister does not wait for or listen to advice unless it suits him. There has been dangerously speedy decision-making on a range of issues—videos and stop-and-search are only two cases in point. The Minister is again refusing to fulfil a promise made to my hon. Friend the Member for Darlington by the Prime Minister. At this point, the House should vote on the issue and resolve it once and for all.

Question put, That the clause be read a Second time:—

The House divided: Ayes 260, Noes 277.

Division No. 194] [7.53 pm
AYES
Abbott, Ms Diane Callaghan, Jim
Adams, Mrs Irene Campbell, Mrs Anne (C'bridge)
Ainger, Nick Campbell, Menzies (Fife NE)
Ainsworth, Robert (Cov'tty NE) Campbell, Ronnie (Blyth V)
Allen, Graham Campbell-Savours, D. N.
Alton, David Cann, Jamie
Anderson, Donald (Swansea E) Carlile, Alexander (Montgomry)
Anderson, Ms Janet (Ros'dale) Chisholm, Malcolm
Armstrong, Hilary Clapham, Michael
Ashton, Joe Clark, Dr David (South Shields)
Austin-Walker, John Clarke, Eric (Midlothian)
Barnes, Harry Clarke, Tom (Monklands W)
Barron, Kevin Clelland, David
Battle, John Clwyd, Mrs Ann
Bayley, Hugh Coffey, Ann
Beckett, Rt Hon Margaret Connarty, Michael
Beggs, Roy Cook, Frank (Stockton N)
Beith, Rt Hon A. J. Cook, Robin (Livingston)
Bell, Stuart Corbett, Robin
Benn, Rt Hon Tony Corbyn, Jeremy
Bennett, Andrew F. Corston, Ms Jean
Benton, Joe Cousins, Jim
Berry, Roger Cummings, John
Betts, Clive Cunningham, Jim (Covy SE)
Blair, Tony Dafis, Cynog
Boateng, Paul Dalyell, Tam
Boyes, Roland Darling, Alistair
Bradley, Keith Davidson, Ian
Bray, Dr Jeremy Davies, Bryan (Oldham C'tral)
Brown, Gordon (Dunfermline E) Davies, Rt Hon Denzil (Llanelli)
Brown, N. (N'c'tle upon Tyne E) Davies, Ron (Caerphilly)
Burden, Richard Denham, John
Caborn, Richard Dewar, Donald
Dixon, Don Loyden, Eddie
Dobson, Frank Lynne, Ms Liz
Donohoe, Brian H. McAllion, John
Dowd, Jim McAvoy, Thomas
Dunnachie, Jimmy McCartney, Ian
Eagle, Ms Angela Macdonald, Calum
Enright, Derek McFall, John
Etherington, Bill McGrady, Eddie
Evans, John (St Helens N) McKelvey, William
Ewing, Mrs Margaret Mackinlay, Andrew
Fatchett, Derek McLeish, Henry
Faulds, Andrew Maclennan, Robert
Field, Frank (Birkenhead) McMaster, Gordon
Fisher, Mark McNamara, Kevin
Flynn, Paul McWilliam, John
Foster, Rt Hon Derek Madden, Max
Foulkes, George Maginnis, Ken
Fraser, John Mahon, Alice
Fyfe, Maria Mallon, Seamus
Galbraith, Sam Mendelson, Peter
Galloway, George Marek, Dr John
Gapes, Mike Marshall, David (Shettleston)
Garrett, John Marshall, Jim (Leicester, S)
George, Bruce Martin, Michael J. (Springburn)
Gerrard, Neil Martlew, Eric
Godman, Dr Norman A. Maxton, John
Golding, Mrs Llin Meacher, Michael
Gordon, Mildred Meale, Alan
Graham, Thomas Michael, Alun
Grant, Bemie (Tottenham) Michie, Bill (Sheffield Heeley)
Griffiths, Win (Bridgend) Michie, Mrs Ray (Argyll Bute)
Grocott, Bruce Milburn, Alan
Gunnell, John Miller, Andrew
Hain, Peter Mitchell, Austin (Gt Grimsby)
Hall, Mike Molyneaux, Rt Hon James
Hanson, David Moonie, Dr Lewis
Harvey, Nick Morgan, Rhodri
Hattersley, Rt Hon Roy Morley, Elliot
Henderson, Doug Morris, Rt Hon A. (Wy'nshawe)
Hendron, Dr Joe Morris, Estelle (B'ham Yardley)
Heppell, John Mowlam, Marjorie
Hill, Keith (Streatham) Mudie, George
Hinchliffe, David Mullin, Chris
Hoey, Kate Murphy, Paul
Hogg, Norman (Cumbernauld) O'Brien, Michael (N W'kshire)
Home Robertson, John O'Brien, William (Normanton)
Hood, Jimmy O'Hara, Edward
Hoon, Geoffrey Olner, William
Howarth, George (Knowsley N) Parry, Robert
Howells, Dr. Kim (Pontypridd) Patchett, Terry
Hoyle, Doug Pendry, Tom
Hughes, Kevin (Doncaster N) Pickthall, Colin
Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N) Pike, Peter L.
Hughes, Roy (Newport E) Pope, Greg
Hume, John Powell, Ray (Ogmore)
Illsley, Eric Prentice, Gordon (Pendle)
Ingram, Adam Prescott, John
Jackson, Glenda (H'stead) Primarolo, Dawn
Jackson, Helen (Shef'ld, H) Purchase, Ken
Jamieson, David Quin, Ms Joyce
Janner, Greville Radice, Giles
Jones, Ieuan Wyn (Ynys Môn) Randall, Stuart
Jones, Jon Owen (Cardiff C) Raynsford, Nick
Jones, Lynne (B'ham S O) Reid, Dr John
Jones, Martyn (Clwyd, SW) Robertson, George (Hamilton)
Jones, Nigel (Cheltenham) Robinson, Geoffrey (Co'try NW)
Jowell, Tessa Roche, Mrs. Barbara
Kaufman, Rt Hon Gerald Rooker, Jeff
Keen, Alan Rooney, Terry
Kennedy, Charles (Ross,C&S) Ross, Emie (Dundee W)
Kennedy, Jane (Lpool Brdgn) Ross, William (E Londonderry)
Khabra, Piara S. Rowlands, Ted
Kilfoyle, Peter Ruddock, Joan
Kinnock, Rt Hon Neil (Islwyn) Sedgemore, Brian
Kirkwood, Archy Sheldon, Rt Hon Robert
Lestor, Joan (Eccles) Shore, Rt Hon Peter
Lewis, Terry Short, Clare
Livingstone, Ken Skinner, Dennis
Lloyd, Tony (Stretford) Smith, Andrew (Oxford E)
Llwyd, Elfyn Smith, C. (Isl'ton S & F'sbury)
Smith, Llew (Blaenau Gwent) Wallace, James
Smyth, Rev Martin (Belfast S) Walley, Joan
Soley, Clive Wardell, Gareth (Gower)
Spearing, Nigel Wareing, Robert N
Spellar, John Watson, Mike
Squire, Rachel (Dunfermline W) Welsh, Andrew
Steel, Rt Hon Sir David Williams, Rt Hon Alan (Sw'n W)
Steinberg, Gerry Williams, Alan W (Carmarthen)
Stevenson, George Wilson, Brian
Stott, Roger Winnick, David
Strang, Dr. Gavin Wise, Audrey
Taylor, Mrs Ann (Dewsbury) Worthington, Tony
Taylor, Rt Hon John D. (Strgfd) Wray, Jimmy
Taylor, Matthew (Truro) Wright, Dr Tony
Trimble, David Young, David (Bolton SE)
Turner, Dennis
Tyler, Paul Tellers for the Ayes:
Vaz, Keith Mr. John Hutton and
Walker, Rt Hon Sir Harold Mr. Stephen Byers.
NOES
Ainsworth, Peter (East Surrey) Davis, David (Boothfery)
Aitken, Jonathan Day, Stephen
Alison, Rt Hon Michael (Selby) Deva, Nirj Joseph
Amess, David Devlin, Tim
Ancram, Michael Dickens, Geoffrey
Arbuthnot, James Dorrell, Stephen
Arnold, Jacques (Gravesham) Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James
Arnold, Sir Thomas (Hazel Grv) Dover, Den
Ashby, David Duncan, Alan
Aspinwall, Jack Duncan-Smith, Iain
Atkins, Robert Dunn, Bob
Atkinson, Peter (Hexham) Dykes, Hugh
Baker, Rt Hon K. (Mole Valley) Eggar, Tim
Baker, Nicholas (Dorset North) Elletson, Harold
Baldry, Tony Evans, David (Welwyn Hatfield)
Banks, Matthew (Southport) Evans, Jonathan (Brecon)
Banks, Robert (Harrogate) Evans, Nigel (Ribble Valley)
Bates, Michael Evans, Roger (Monmouth)
Bellingham, Henry Evennett, David
Bendall, Vivian Fabricant, Michael
Beresford, Sir Paul Fairbairn, Sir Nicholas
Biffen, Rt Hon John Field, Barry (Isle of Wight)
Blackburn, Dr John G. Fishburn, Dudley
Body, Sir Richard Forman, Nigel
Bonsor, Sir Nicholas Forth, Eric
Booth, Hartley Fowler, Rt Hon Sir Norman
Boswell, Tim Fox, Dr Liam (Woodspring)
Bottomley, Peter (Eltham) Fox, Sir Marcus (Shipley)
Bottomley, Rt Hon Virginia Freeman, Rt Hon Roger
Bowden, Andrew French, Douglas
Bowis, John Gale, Roger
Boyson, Rt Hon Sir Rhodes Gallie, Phil
Brandreth, Gyles Gardiner, Sir George
Brazier, Julian Garel-Jones, Rt Hon Tristan
Bright, Graham Garnier, Edward
Brooke, Rt Hon Peter Gill, Christopher
Browning, Mrs. Angela Gillan, Cheryl
Bruce, Ian (S Dorset) Goodlad, Rt Hon Alastair
Burns, Simon Goodson-Wickes, Dr Charles
Carlisle, John (Luton North) Gorman, Mrs Teresa
Carlisle, Kenneth (Lincoln) Gorst, John
Carrington, Matthew Grant, Sir A. (Cambs SW)
Carttiss, Michael Greenway, Harry (Ealing N)
Cash, William Greenway, John (Ryedale)
Chapman, Sydney Griffiths, Peter (Portsmouth, N)
Clappison, James Hague, William
Clark, Dr Michael (Rochford) Hamilton, Neil (Tatton)
Clifton-Brown, Geoffrey Hampson, Dr Keith
Coe, Sebastian Hanley, Jeremy
Colvin, Michael Hannam, Sir John
Congdon, David Hargreaves, Andrew
Conway, Derek Harris, David
Coombs, Simon (Swindon) Haselhurst, Alan
Cope, Rt Hon Sir John Hawkins, Nick
Couchman, James Hawksley, Warren
Cran, James Hayes, Jerry
Currie, Mrs Edwina (S D'by'ire) Heald, Oliver
Curry, David (Skipton & Ripon) Heath, Rt Hon Sir Edward
Davies, Quentin (Stamford) Heathcoat-Amory, David
Hendry, Charles Patnick, Irvine
Hicks, Robert Pawsey, James
Higgins, Rt Hon Sir Terence L. Peacock, Mrs Elizabeth
Hill, James (Southampton Test) Pickles, Eric
Hogg, Rt Hon Douglas (G'tham) Porter, Barry (Wirral S)
Horam, John Porter, David (Waveney)
Hordern, Rt Hon Sir Peter Portillo, Rt Hon Michael
Howard, Rt Hon Michael Redwood, Rt Hon John
Howarth, Alan (Strat'rd-on-A) Richards, Rod
Howell, Rt Hon David (G'dford) Riddick, Graham
Hughes Robert G. (Harrow W) Robathan, Andrew
Hunt, Rt Hon David (Wirral W) Roberts, Rt Hon Sir Wyn
Hunter, Andrew Robertson, Raymond (Ab'd'n S)
Jackson, Robert (Wantage) Robinson, Mark (Somerton)
Jenkin, Bemard Roe, Mrs Marion (Broxbourne)
Jessel, Toby Rowe, Andrew (Mid Kent)
Johnson Smith, Sir Geoffrey Rumbold, Rt Hon Dame Angela
Jones, Gwilym (Cardiff N) Ryder, Rt Hon Richard
Jones, Robert B. (W Hertfdshr) Sackville, Tom
Jopling, Rt Hon Michael Scott, Rt Hon Nicholas
Kellett-Bowman, Dame Elaine Shaw, David (Dover)
Key, Robert Shaw, Sir Giles (Pudsey)
Kilfedder, Sir James Shepherd, Rt Hon Gillian
King, Rt Hon Tom Shepherd, Richard (Aldridge)
Kirkhope, Timothy Shersby, Michael
Knapman, Roger Sims, Roger
Knight, Mrs Angela (Erewash) Skeet, Sir Trevor
Knight, Greg (Derby N) Smith, Tim (Beaconsfield)
Knight, Dame Jill (Bir'm E'st'n) Soames, Nicholas
Knox, Sir David Spicer, Sir James (W Dorset)
Kynoch, George (Kincardine) Spicer, Michael (S Worcs)
Lait, Mrs Jacqui Spink, Dr Robert
Lang, Rt Hon Ian Spring, Richard
Lawrence, Sir Ivan Sproat, Iain
Legg, Barry Squire, Robin (Hornchurch)
Leigh, Edward Stanley, Rt Hon Sir John
Lennox-Boyd, Mark Steen, Anthony
Lester, Jim (Broxtowe) Stephen, Michael
Lidington, David Stewart, Allan
Lightbown, David Streeter, Gary
Lilley, Rt Hon Peter Sumberg, David
Lloyd, Rt Hon Peter (Fareham) Sweeney, Walter
Lord, Michael Sykes, John
Luff, Peter Tapsell, Sir Peter
Lyell, Rt Hon Sir Nicholas Taylor, Ian (Esher)
MacGregor, Rt Hon John Taylor, John M. (Solihull)
Maclean, David Taylor, Sir Teddy (Southend, E)
McLoughlin, Patrick Temple-Morris, Peter
McNair-Wilson, Sir Patrick Thomason, Roy
Major, Rt Hon John Thompson, Sir Donald (C'er V)
Malone, Gerald Thompson, Patrick (Norwich N)
Mans, Keith Thornton, Sir Malcolm
Marland, Paul Thurnham, Peter
Marlow, Tony Townsend, Cyril D. (Bexl'yh'th)
Marshall, John (Hendon S) Tracey, Richard
Martin, David (Portsmouth S) Tredinnick, David
Mates, Michael Trend, Michael
Mawhinney, Rt Hon Dr Brian Trotter, Neville
Merchant, Piers Twinn, Dr Ian
Mills, Iain Vaughan, Sir Gerard
Mitchell, Andrew (Gedling) Viggers, Peter
Mitchell, Sir David (Hants NW) Walden, George
Moate, Sir Roger Walker, Bill (N Tayside)
Monro, Sir Hector Waller, Gary
Montgomery, Sir Fergus Wardle, Charles (Bexhill)
Moss, Malcolm Waterson, Nigel
Nelson, Anthony Watts, John
Neubert, Sir Michael Wells, Bowen
Newton, Rt Hon Tony Wheeler, Rt Hon Sir John
Nicholls, Patrick Whitney, Ray
Nicholson, David (Taunton) Whittingdale, John
Nicholson, Emma (Devon West) Widdecombe, Ann
Norris, Steve Wiggin, Sir Jerry
Onslow, Rt Hon Sir Cranley Willetts, David
Oppenheim, Phillip Wilshire, David
Ottaway, Richard Winterton, Mrs Ann (Congleton)
Page, Richard Winterton, Nicholas (Macc'f'ld)
Paice, James Wolfson, Mark
Wood, Timothy Tellers for the Noes:
Yeo, Tim Mr. Andrew MacKay and
Young, Rt Hon Sir George Mr. Michael Brown.

Question accordingly negatived.

Forward to