§ 7. Mr. Menzies CampbellTo ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will make a statement about the future road programme in Fife.
§ Lord James Douglas-HamiltonThe new east Fife regional road is proving a great success, and our future plans for Fife will bring further benefits. We announced in February major proposals for the firth of Forth including a second Forth road bridge. We are currently studying a west Fife regional road as part of our longer-term network.
§ Mr. CampbellThe Minister will know that the A91 trunk road for which his Department has responsibility runs through my constituency and in particular through the town of Cupar. Will he tell my constituents why he is 342 delaying the authorisation of the Bonargate relief road and the Cupar bypass, both of which are necessary not only for safety and convenience but for the protection of the environment?
§ Lord James Douglas-HamiltonTraffic management schemes are currently being proposed for Cupar. There are proposals for a bypass not only in Cupar but in Auchtermuchty. The criteria for bypasses include traffic flow and composition, safety considerations, environmental factors, feasibility and the relationship to local and national developments. One of the features of the trunk road network review which we carried out last year was the recommendation that we should concentrate on the strategic routes in the first instance. A number of bypasses cannot therefore go ahead as quickly as some of us would wish.
§ Mr. Home RobertsonAs there is already a dual carriageway across the firth of Forth, does the Minister accept that there should be no need for a second Forth road bridge if the Government would only co-operate with local authorities and ScotRail to provide better commuter services for the communities on both sides of the firth of Forth? Does he accept the case for a passenger transport executive to serve not only the people of Fife but the people of Lothian region in my constituency?
Lord James Douglas HamiltonWe are putting forward a package of proposals for both Fife and the Lothian region. We believe that a second road crossing of the Forth is necessary because the number and length of major delays will escalate year after year out of all proportion to what is considered reasonable or satisfactory.
§ Mr. Home RobertsonWhat about a proper train service?
Lord James Douglas HamiltonI agree with the hon. Gentleman that one of the key elements for a package is to provide more rail stops not only in Fife—
§ Mr. Home RobertsonAnd trains.
§ Lord James Douglas-HamiltonI agree. That is one of the key factors that we shall consider. We are awaiting representations and a feasibility study from the regions concerned, and a package of measures from Lothian region which we shall consider sympathetically as part of the whole. It is not only the Al which is important for Scotland, but all the infrastructure prospects for the east of Scotland.