§ Q1. Mr. Simon CoombsTo ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 20 July.
§ The Prime Minister (Mr. John Major)This morning, I had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in the House, I shall be having further meetings later today.
§ Mr. CoombsWill my right hon. Friend confirm that today's report from the Confederation of British Industry, showing the fastest increase in retail sales for three years, is clear evidence of the recovery that is taking place in our economy? Are not those figures the results of an economic policy that is based on low inflation, low interest rates and falling unemployment?
§ The Prime MinisterIt is a very encouraging report, and the sixth successive increase that retailers have reported. In the past week, we have seen inflation down, unemployment down, manufacturing up and now retail sales up. We have an excellent opportunity to build the lasting recovery that we all wish to see. I do not propose to put that at risk by burdening business with the extra costs that we have spent the past 14 years getting rid of.
§ Mr. John SmithDoes the Prime Minister accept the opinion expressed by the great constitutional expert, Professor Dicey—[Interruption.]
§ Madam SpeakerOrder. These interruptions use very valuable time.
§ Mr. SmithI had thought that at least some of the hon. Gentleman and hon. Ladies on the Conservative Benches might have heard of him. Does the Prime Minister accept his opinion that
the one essential principle of the constitution is obedience by all persons to the deliberately expressed will of House of Commons"?
§ The Prime MinisterBy some time this evening, the European Communities (Amendment) Bill will have passed the Lords and Commons and will have Royal Assent. That is clearly the will of the House. Why is the right hon. and learned Gentleman seeking to obstruct it?
§ Madam SpeakerOrder. The House will come to order. There is a great deal of nonsense going on. [Interruption.] I shall remove some hon. Gentleman.
§ Mr. SmithThe right hon. Gentleman has answered a question that was not asked. It is a simple principle: does the Prime Minister accept the will of the House of Commons on whatever subject it is expressed? Can he say yes or no?
§ The Prime MinisterI might equally ask the right hon. and learned Gentleman—as I just did—exactly the same question, because the clearest possible way to express the will of the House is to pass an Act of Parliament, which will have been done with the Queen's Assent ratified by the close of business today. I repeat to the right hon. and learned Gentleman: after that Act has received Royal Assent, why is he seeking to obstruct it?
§ Mr. SmithDoes the Prime Minister not understand that the question before the House on Thursday night is required by the very Bill to which he has referred? Will he tell us whether the Government will accept the decision of the House whatever it is?
§ The Prime MinisterThe right hon. and learned Gentleman knows that the House does not support the social chapter. The House genuinely wants the treaty that I signed, and I expect the House to reflect its genuine will in Thursday's debate.
§ Mr. John MarshallIs my right hon. Friend aware that Hendon school in my constituency was one of the first schools to become grant maintained? Is he further aware that it is now heavily oversubscribed, and does he agree that what is good for Hendon is good for the country?
§ The Prime MinisterI think that up and down the country people have indicated that they are in favour of the principle of grant-maintained schools, which have shown that they are very successful. We believe that that choice should be available.
§ Mr. AshdownI understand why the Prime Minister will want time to study in full the Sheehy report on the police, but will he at least dispose of one of its recommendations now? Does he really believe that the battle against crime will be assisted by cutting our already undermanned police force by a further 3,000 as Sheehy recommends?
§ The Prime MinisterWith respect to the right hon. Gentleman, he has misread the report. Sheehy does not recommend that. The Sheehy report is independent. We are examining it, and when we have examined it and consulted on it, we will reach conclusions.
§ Mr. BurnsWill my right hon. Friend join me in congratulating the Ministry of Defence on placing more than 90 per cent. of its defence procurement requirements with British companies to protect British jobs and British expertise? Will he please use his considerable negotiating skills to impress on the American Department of Defence that it is unacceptable that British companies are stopped by Acts of Congress from competing in the American market for the supply of items such as image intensifiers which are produced in Chelmsford, thus causing unemployment in a company whose product is the best in the country?
§ The Prime MinisterWe believe in free trade and an open market in this as in other things.
§ Q2. Mr. Roy HughesTo ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 20 July.
§ The Prime MinisterI refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave some moments ago.
§ Mr. HughesDoes the Prime Minister recall his aim of a nation at ease with itself? His Government are imposing 17.5 per cent. VAT on domestic fuel and attacking those who are on invalidity benefit, and now there is a cloud over state pensions. How does he reconcile that contradiction, as a nation can never be at ease with itself when there are such attacks on the underprivileged in society? I suggest that it might have something to do with his family's circus background—[interruption]
§ Madam SpeakerOrder. This is Prime Minister's Question Time.
§ Mr. HughesI suggest that at an early age the Prime Minister was taught to stand on his head—[interruption]
§ Madam SpeakerOrder. As I have said, this is Prime Minister's Question Time; it is not an Adjournment debate.
§ The Prime MinisterI am afraid that I did not hear the concluding words of the hon. Gentleman's speech, but I heard the early part of it. He clearly neglected to mention that last week it was perfectly clear that VAT on fuel was also the policy of the official Opposition and the Liberal party. The official Opposition are still canvassing that. He also neglected in his catalogue many measures that have been taken to help people who are disadvantaged and to reduce tax levels for people on low incomes. Perhaps he should take a more rounded view.
§ Q3. Sir Roger MoateTo ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 20 July.
§ The Prime MinisterI refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave some moments ago.
§ Sir Roger MoateIs my right hon. Friend aware that some of us are very much opposed to the Maastricht treaty, but still believe that he scored a great personal and national triumph when he secured the opt-outs from the single currency and from the social chapter so beloved of the Labour party? Quite apart from the costs to industry and the loss of jobs, does he agree that the social chapter would reintroduce the corporatism that did such damage to Britain in the 1970s and before? Will he confirm that he has no intention of ratifying a treaty which contains the social chapter?
§ The Prime MinisterI am well aware of my hon. Friend's long-standing views on the European Community and his disapproval of much of the Maastricht treaty. While I do not share his views, I respect the strength and consistency of his feelings. I entirely agree with him about the damage done by the social chapter. It is an unemployment charter which will destroy our future prosperity. It will prevent the creation of jobs. It is a socialist charter and we want nothing of it.
§ Mr. HumeIn the light of the clear evidence that Lord Tebbit publicly encourages terrorism, which emerged yesterday when he spoke on television advising loyalist paramilitaries in Belfast that if they wanted to achieve their objectives they should bomb Dublin, and when last evening those same paramilitaries bombed the homes of my hon. Friend the Member for Belfast, West (Dr. Hendron) and two leading members of our party, will the Prime Minister now ask the Home Secretary to implement Government policy, issue an exclusion order against Lord Tebbit and send him to Northern Ireland?
§ The Prime MinisterI think that the whole House knows my right hon. and noble Friend very well. He has suffered violently at the hands of terrorists. All his political life he has been a vigorous opponent of terrorism. I may not share his every view, but I believe passionately that he is one of the strongest opponents of terrorism this House has seen now or at any stage in the past.
§ Mr. WellsWill my right hon. Friend take some time to read the leader in the Evening Standard last week which 193 ascribed to his leadership the low inflation, low interest rates and low unit wage costs which are leading Britain out of unemployment and into prosperity?
§ The Prime MinisterAs my hon. Friend knows, I believe that our prosperity must be based on a low-inflation economy. It has not been easy to achieve; there have been many sacrifices made by many people and I repeatedly acknowledge that, but we have the lowest inflation rate for 29 years. We need to sustain it and build growth on that low inflation.
§ Q4. Mr. Jon Owen JonesTo ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 20 July.
§ The Prime MinisterI refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave some moments ago.
§ Mr. JonesDid the Prime Minister find time to see last night's "Panorama" programme? If he did, he will have seen disturbing evidence suggesting that dental equipment can transmit the AIDS virus and that in America strong evidence suggests that it has already done so in some cases, and perhaps in many. As The Lancet states that more than 75 per cent. of all dentists in Britain do not routinely autoclave their equipment between patients, is it not time that we regulated and inspected our dentists in order to protect our dental reputation and our citizens when they go to the dentist?
§ The Prime MinisterThe straightforward answer is no, I did not see the "Panorama" programme last night; nor has the hon. Gentleman's point been put to me previously. I have no doubt that my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health will have heard about the programme and will be examining its findings.