§ 6. Dr. Michael ClarkTo ask the Secretary of State for Defence what steps are being taken to encourage competitive tendering for military research and development.
§ Mr. Kenneth CarlisleEquipment procurement including development is already subject to competitive tendering wherever practicable. As regards research, once a full trading relationship has been established between the 135 Ministry of Defence and the Defence Research Agency, we intend to implement a progressive extension of competition.
§ Dr. ClarkDoes my hon. Friend accept that military research and development provides a significant technological spin-off for civilian use? Does he accept, therefore, that if more of the research sponsored by his Department were replaced by competitive tendering by universities, research associations or private companies, the benefits for non-military use could he greatly enhanced?
§ Mr. CarlisleI respect the point made by my hon. Friend. It might be of interest to the House to hear that already about 40 per cent. of the research undertaken by the Defence Research Agency is subcontracted from the Ministry of Defence to universities and industry—indeed, almost the whole of the development work goes to industry. We certainly welcome collaboration with the civil sector and industry, a good example of which is our work on jet engine technology. We wish to develop that interaction.
§ Sir Geoffrey Johnson SmithDoes my hon. Friend agree that it is important to have a research and development policy and a future procurement policy? Unless there is a prospect of orders, research and development in the military sector is bound to suffer.
§ Mr. CarlisleMy hon. Friend makes a good point. As he knows. the research effort in the Ministry of Defence is undergoing substantial change in terms of the Defence Research Agency. Our aim is to ensure that we become more efficient and enhance the effectiveness of our sharp end research.