HC Deb 28 June 1988 vol 136 c310

7.—(1) An intimate sample may be taken from a person in police detention only—

  1. (a) if a police officer of at least the rank of superintendent authorises it to be taken; and
  2. (b) if the appropriate consent is given.

(2) An officer may only give an authorisation if he has reasonable grounds—

  1. (a) for suspecting the involvement of the person from whom the sample is to be taken in an offence to which this Schedule applies; and
  2. (b) for believing that the sample will tend to confirm or disprove his involvement.

(3) An officer may give an authorisation under sub-paragraph (1) above orally or in writing but, if he gives it orally, he shall confirm it in writing as soon as is practicable.

(4) The appropriate consent must be given in writing.

(5) Where—

  1. (a) an authorisation has been given; and
  2. (b) it is proposed that an intimate sample shall be taken in pursuance of the authorisation,
an officer shall inform the person from whom the sample is to be taken—
  1. (i) of the giving of the authorisation; and
  2. (ii) of the grounds for giving it.

(6) The duty imposed by sub-paragraph (5)(ii) above includes a duty to state the nature of the offence in which it is suspected that the person from whom the sample is to be taken has been involved.

(7) If an intimate sample is taken from a person—

  1. (a) the authorisation by virtue of which it was taken;
  2. (b) the grounds for giving the authorisation; and
  3. (c) the fact that the appropriate consent was given,
shall be recorded in writing as soon as is practicable after the sample is taken.

(8) An intimate sample, other than a sample of urine, may only be taken from a person by a registered medical practitioner.

(9) Where the appropriate consent to the taking of an intimate sample from a person was refused without good cause, in any proceedings against that person for an offence—

  1. (a) the court, in determining—
    1. (i) whether to commit that person for trial; or
    2. (ii) whether there is a case to answer; and
  2. (b) the court or jury, in determining whether that person is guilty of the offence charged,
may draw such inferences from the refusal as appear proper; and the refusal may, on the basis of such inferences, be treated as, or as capable of amounting to, corroboration of any evidence against the person in relation to which the refusal is material.

(10) Nothing in this paragraph affects Articles 141 to 152 of the Road Traffic (Northern Ireland) Order 1981.

Forward to