§ 13. Mr. David Atkinsonasked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a statement on his proposals to privatise local government services following his recent consultations.
§ Mr. WaldegraveIt remains our firm intention to introduce legislation to require competition for a range of local authority services as soon as the parliamentary timetable permits.
§ Mr. AtkinsonNow that it has been proved beyond all reasonable doubt that the most remarkable savings have been made by privatising local government services, without a loss of standards in those services and with the full approval of the electorate, as was amply demonstrated in the election results of 8 May, will my hon. Friend hasten the time when he plans to introduce legislation to oblige all local authorities to put such services to the competitive test?
§ Mr. WaldegraveI can only repeat what I said in my initial answer, that, without in any way anticipating the contents of the Queen's Speech, if legislative time is available, the Government intend to take further action in this area.
§ Mr. Tony LloydWhat conclusion does the Minister draw from the large number of formerly Conservative-controlled authorities which reject the privatisation of 357 services, particularly the borough of Trafford, which examined in detail the possibility of privatising refuse collection and decided that it would not make economic sense?
§ Mr. WaldegraveI draw the same conclusion as I draw from the fact that a number of Conservative councils which were at the forefront of privatisation, including Bath, Wandsworth, Westminister, and Merton, did rather well at the local elections, namely, that what controls the swings at modern local government elections is, unfortunately, the national position.