§ Mr. Richard Holt (Langbaurgh)On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. This matter may appear to be trivial, but most hon. Members have received on many occasions representations concerned with respect in every form. You made a ruling last week that, if hon. Members were to be seen in this House and called during questions, they could be without a jacket but not without a tie.
Although this may appear to be a small point, respect for the person and respect for property at large are subjects that are dealt with frequently in our mailbags. There must be respect in this House. We look to you, Mr. Speaker, to ensure that a lead is given. Today you called the hon. 1009 Member for Sunderland, North (Mr. Clay), although he was not wearing a tie. Have you changed your ruling, Mr. Speaker?
§ Mr. SpeakerI think that that is a trivial point. I suggested to the House that we should maintain standards of dress, but I certainly will not put myself in a position that prevents me from calling hon. Members because of the way in which they dress.