§ 8. Mr. Dormandasked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a further statement on the Government's response to the Commission on Energy and the Environment's report, "Coal and the Environment."
§ Mr. MacfarlaneProgress continues to be made in implementing the commitments given in the Government's response to the commission's report.
§ Mr. DormandWill the Minister give further attention to two aspects that are emphasised in the report? First, renewed efforts should be made with regard to dereliction. However, I immediately recognise the excellent work that has been done under Governments of both parties. Secondly, the despoliation of beaches is as serious now as it was when the report was published in 1981. In coalmining areas beaches provide an important amenity, yet they are an eyesore now as they are covered with coal waste. Will the hon. Gentleman do something about that?
§ Mr. MacfarlaneWe share the hon. Gentleman's anxieties and agree with the strategy that he wants to see implemented. Within the resources available, I can give the hon. Gentleman that full assurance. The Horden pipeline experiment is of great importance but is not at present operating because of the dispute. However, in use it has proved technically very successful. The experimental period is to be extended to allow a full assessment to be made once the dispute is over.
§ Mr. FormanWhen considering the Government's response to the impact of coal on the environment, will my hon. Friend and his ministerial colleagues be prepared to give full weight to the possibility of installing equipment on a pilot basis which might reduce the emissions of acid and other noxious substances from coal-fired power stations?
§ Mr. MacfarlaneI note my hon. Friend's request. I shall study it and write to him.
§ Mr. Gareth WardellAre the Government satisfied that no longer will opencast coal mine workings be permitted as near to occupied dwellings as 50 yards?
§ Mr. MacfarlaneWe have considered many elements of planning and coal, coal extraction and the general development order. They are all under review and are constantly under discussion, though the role of the local authority is obviously of prime importance. We have made great steps, and I shall look into the point that the hon. Gentleman raises.
§ Mr. BarronWill the Minister also look into the cost of the protection of the environment arising from coal mining? Does he think, for example, that the Exchequer might relieve the National Coal Board of some of its costs, so making pits more economic?
§ Mr. MacfarlaneThe hon. Gentleman, representing the part of England that he does, will be pleased to hear that my right hon. Friend has agreed to provide £2.5 million to help finance spoil disposal schemes. A list of possible schemes has now been drawn up and discussions between my Department, the NCB and the local authorities involved are continuing. That is good news.