§ Mr. David Ennals (Norwich, North)On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. I gave you notice this morning that I wished to raise a point of order on the extensive leaks of this afternoon's Budget statement, about which—
§ Mr. SpeakerOrder. Perhaps I may save the right hon. Gentleman's time. No one can tell yet whether there has been a leak—at least, I cannot tell. It is not a matter for me whether, as we shall discover as time advances, there has been a leak.
§ Mr. EnnalsFurther to that point of order, Mr. Speaker. One well-known journalist, on the front page of The Standard today, said:
At Westminster, MPs were speculating whether Sir Geoffrey could have many surprises left with the Treasury already leaking the general shape of the tax package.I submit—[Interruption.]
§ Mr. SpeakerOrder. The House must be patient for a moment so that we can discover whether there is a point of order on which I can rule.
§ Mr. EnnalsI submit, Mr. Speaker, that when we have heard the Chancellor of the Exchequer's speech we shall know whether the extensive leaks of the past three days were true. The example that I have in mind is the suggested increase from £25,000 to £35,000 in the amount of mortgage eligible for tax relief.
§ Mr. SpeakerOrder. That is not a point of order with which I can deal.
§ Mr. Ennalsrose—
§ Mr. SpeakerOrder. The House should now be allowed to continue.