§ 22. Mr. Canavanasked the hon. Member for Berwick-upon-Tweed, answering for the House of Commons Commission, what subjects he expects to be discussed at the next meeting between the Commission and trade union representatives of House employees.
§ Mr. BeithNegotiations and consultations have usually been carried on between representatives of management and trade unions, without the direct involvement of the Commission.
§ Mr. CanavanNow that the new Commission has been appointed, can we expect to see the abandonment of reactionary proposals such as the no-strike clause in employees' contracts? What are the prospects for better industrial relations in the House of Commons now that the previous chairman has gone to further his ambitions in the House of Lords?
§ Mr. BeithFrom the beginning, the Commission's objective has been to have good relationships with the staff of the House and to ensure that its business proceeds without impediment. The view that it should so proceed is widely shared by those who work here and by hon. Members. There is a world of difference between that and no-strike agreements. It is on that basis that negotiations have taken place and I understand that they are proceeding satisfactorily.
§ Mr. FreudDoes my hon. Friend accept that it would harm industrial relations not one jot if all the loyal staff who worked in the Palace of Westminster were given two tickets per Session for the Public Gallery?
§ Mr. BeithMy hon. Friend makes an interesting suggestion. It would normally fall to be considered by the Services Committee rather than by the Commission, but I shall endeavour to ensure that it is so considered.