§ Ql. Mr. Warrenasked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 17 February.
§ The Prime Minister (Mrs. Margaret Thatcher)This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. After my duties in the House I shall be leaving for a visit to the north-west of England.
§ Mr. WarrenDuring the course of her busy day will my right hon. Friend consider the need to look beyond the battle of words about military force levels and the bomb, and try to get to the Soviet Union an understanding, through that Iron Curtain that divides us from them, that it is seen as the threat to peace in the West?
§ The Prime MinisterI agree with my hon. Friend that the Soviet leadership must understand that its remorseless military build-up, deployment of SS20s and the use of force beyond its borders constitute a threat to peace.
§ Mr. DobsonIn view of the Prime Minister's announcement that she subscribes to many of the Victorian values, will she tell the House which she most fancies reintroducing—the absence of a National Health Service, the absence of old-age pensions, the workhouse, or a long series of colonial wars?
§ The Prime MinisterWhat I favour is acceptance of personal responsibility, freedom of choice and a British Empire that took both freedom and the rule of law to countries that would never have known it otherwise.
§ Mr. NeubertIs my right hon. Friend aware that in 1970 I was effectively denied a seat in the House by the Labour Government's deliberate failure to implement the proposals of the Boundary Commission? Is it not clear from last night's disgraceful performance by the Opposition that, having received an unfavourable verdict in the courts, the Labour party is once again seeking to thwart democracy and avoid another unfavourable verdict in the ballot box?
§ The Prime MinisterI agree that the Boundary Commission's decisions are independent—
§ Mr. CanavanTell us another one.
§ The Prime MinisterThe testing through the courts was independent and it is now up to parliamentary democracy to put through those decisions with all possible speed.
§ Q2. Mrs. McElhoneasked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 17 February.
§ The Prime MinisterI refer the hon. Member to the reply that I gave some moments ago.
§ Mrs. McElhoneWill the Prime Minister take time to reflect on how she misled women at the last general election by her confidence trick—[HON. MEMBERS:"Reading."]—of portraying herself as an ordinary housewife and mother? Mothers are suffering because of her policies and through seeing their husbands and children unemployed. Youngsters in my constituency are reaching their 21st birthday without even having a first job. Will the Prime Minister give these long-suffering people some hope by calling a general election in June?
§ The Prime MinisterI have noted the hon. Lady's recommendation and will consider it, but I must tell her that I have not yet made up my mind and there is plenty of time to do so.
Unemployment is indeed a grievous problem in the hon. Lady's area. I am sure that she will be pleased to know that in her area, the west of Scotland special development area, the first of 1,400 defence jobs scheduled for Glasgow will come in the first week of March. The Government have placed an order worth £250 million for two type 22 frigates with the area's shipbuilders—
§ Mr. SkinnerReading.
§ The Prime MinisterI am giving an accurate account of the jobs that are going to that area. Lilley Construction, a subsidiary of the Glasgow-based engineering and construction firm FJC Lilley, has won a £37.6 million contract for a water supply project in Nigeria. A £30 million project planned for Glasgow's dockland has been announced by the Clyde water authority, which will also bring a large number of jobs.
465 I am sure that the hon. Lady will join me in being very pleased about those new jobs.
§ Mr. RostHas the Prime Minister noticed that Socialist-controlled Derbyshire county council proposes to increase the rates by three times the going rate of inflation? Is it not disgraceful that Socialist councils up and down the country are creating more unemployment by inflicting price increases on businesses struggling to remain competitive?
§ The Prime MinisterI agree that placing heavy extra rate burdens on industry and commerce will mean that they cannot keep their prices competitive. That may mean that people who now have jobs will lose them because of high-rating Socialist authorities.
§ Mr. FootAs the right hon. Lady says that she is willing to accept personal responsibility in some of these matters—in the case of unemployment that is quite a novelty on her part—does she accept responsibility for reports in The Guardian today claiming that in many Government Departments measures are being prepared to attack various aspects of the welfare state? How far have those discussions gone and when will they be published?
§ The Prime MinisterAs the right hon. Gentleman knows full well, we do not intend to dismantle the welfare state. Our record with regard to the National Health Service is far better than that of the Labour Government. It should come as no surprise to the right hon. Gentleman or to the people of this country to know that, unlike the Labour party, the Government are determined to give individuals and their families more choice and more freedom to exercise responsibility and to seek better value for money and better management throughout the public sector. We are very proud of that.
§ Mr. FootIf the right hon. Lady accepts responsibility for that report, will she answer the questions apparently put by one of her Whitehall advisers on this matter? Have the people who drew up the report never been to Merseyside or Brixton? How can people become more self-reliant in the north-west when four out of five school leavers are unemployed? If the Government believes in free choice, why are they not ready to give mothers the choice of going to work or staying at home? Will the right hon. Lady accept responsibility for all those questions?
§ The Prime MinisterThe way to get more jobs is not by rhetoric from the right hon. Gentleman but by having well designed goods at competitive prices. That means keeping rates low and wages hand in hand with productivity, and keeping inflation down. Only that will achieve more jobs, as the right hon. Gentleman well knows. If he can go out and create a business that achieves that, jolly good luck to him.
§ Mr. FootWill the right hon. Lady tell us what is the latest mass unemployment figure for which she is responsible?
§ The Prime MinisterThe right hon. Gentleman is aware of the unemployment figure. He is also aware that unemployment is very much higher than it used to be in other countries, that it is a world problem—[Interruption.] —and that it will be solved not by shouting but only by people who create small businesses and expand them, which the Labour party is not outstanding at achieving.