HC Deb 09 March 1982 vol 19 c715
17. Mr. Newens

asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will take steps to enable disabled persons whose allowances do not allow them to qualify for supplementary benefit to become eligible on similar terms to those in receipt of supplementary benefit for the long-term rate of benefit or its equivalent where this exceeds their benefits.

Mr. Newton

We are well aware of the difficulty of the so called "invalidity trap" and have sympathy with the hon. Gentleman's desire to see it resolved. Because of the substantial benefit and staff costs, however, we cannot see our way to this as yet.

Mr. Newens

Does the hon. Gentleman accept that disablement benefits have become the instrument whereby the disabled are put at a serious disadvantage compared with the able-bodied? Is that not a disgrace and is it not vital to take immediate steps to overcome the difficulties and to place the disabled at least on an equal basis with the able-bodied?

Mr. Newton

I have pointed out that we understand and sympathise with the hon. Gentleman's concern. We have already taken one useful step, which has removed the trap for youngsters aged 16 and 17 on non-contributory invalidity. They can go straight on to the long-term supplementary benefit rate. I hope that the hon. Gentleman will accept that as an earnest of our good intentions.

Mr. Alfred Morris

Is the Minister aware that many disabled people on supplementary benefit are being denied the higher rate of heating allowance simply because they have opted for an invalid vehicle instead of mobility allowance? Is that not grossly unjust and quite indefensible? When will that anomaly be removed?

Mr. Newton

I hope that the right hon. Gentleman will understand when I say that I shall consider that point and may get in touch with him.