§ 12. Mr. Pittasked the Secretary of State for Employment what is the current rate of unemployment in Greater London.
§ Mr. Peter MorrisonAt 8 October the rate of unemployment in Greater London was 8.9 per cent.
§ Mr. PittI thank the hon. Gentleman for that reply. Does he accept the report of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, 155 which states that each unemployed person costs the Government £4,500? If he does, does he accept also that a policy of economic regeneration, including investment in jobs rather than the dole, would be a far better investment of Government money?
§ Mr. MorrisonI am delighted that representatives of the Liberal Party are present in the Chamber. During the debate on the Queen's Speech last week there was one occasion when for three-quarters of an hour only one Liberal Member was present in the Chamber. It is interesting that Liberals are now taking an interest in employment. I do not necessarily accept the report to which the hon. Gentleman refers. Reflation creates a loss of jobs.
§ Mr. JesselDoes my hon. Friend agree that one of the greatest threats to employment in Greater London consists of the heavy rates that are levied on employers by the Greater London Council?
§ Mr. MorrisonYes. There can be no doubt about that. There is some evidence that firms are moving out of, London because of the increased rates in the London area.
§ Mr. PavittWill the Government do something for the inner city areas of London, such as Willesden, in which unemployment has doubled in the past 12 months? Is he aware that the Guiness company, a large firm in my constituency, has 250 redundancies in the pipeline? I understand that Heinz has 200 redundancies in prospect and that Associated Automation will close with the loss of 500 jobs. Will the hon. Gentleman take some new initiatives?
§ Mr. MorrisonThere are already two inner city partnerships in London, with a budget of £24 million this year. There is also an urban development corporation, with a budget of £65 million. With respect, I cannot comment specifically on the hon. Gentleman's constituency, because I do not know.