HC Deb 27 April 1981 vol 3 cc508-9
10. Sir Anthony Meyer

asked the Secretary of State for Energy what discussions he has had with the EEC on the funding of pilot projects for the liquefaction of coal.

Mr. John Moore

I have had no detailed discussions with the European Commission, but in answer to a recent inquiry from Commissioner Davignon I have confirmed that the Government's consideration of the National Coal Board's proposal to build a pilot coal liquefaction facility is not yet complete.

Sir Anthony Meyer

Will my hon. Friend ensure that that valuable project, which can bring great benefits to my constituency and to the coal industry, is not allowed to collapse merely because the Government pull out in such a way as to discourage the EEC and private funds from supporting it, as they readily will if given encouragement?

Mr. Moore

I should not wish to see that. I acknowledge my hon. Friend's long and diligent constituency interest in this matter. The United Kingdom wants to see the process developed in a technologically successful manner. I am sure that my hon. Friend will wish to ensure that such processes have every opportunity to be developed successfully in the best possible way.

Mr. Barry Jones

Does the Minister recollect the plea from Flint council that the project should go ahead urgently, if only because the area has 32 per cent. male unemployment? Is he aware of the growing suspicion in North Wales that the project may be the victim of expenditure cuts? What does he propose to say to get rid of the lingering suspicions?

Mr. Moore

Not all lingering suspicions can be totally dispelled, but the discussion and debate concern the process and the technology surrounding coal liquefaction's long-term success. They do not concern budgetary success, although we must remember that taxpayers' money is a rare resource and must be used wisely.

Mr. Eadie

Has the hon. Gentleman seen this month's issue of the Miner, which states in banner headlines that there has been a complete year's loss in the Point of Ayr coal liquefaction scheme and that his Department has had for a year the information asked for by his chief scientist, Dr. Challis? Is he aware that that is serious and challenges the competence of his chief scientist? Is he also aware that the Miner appears to suggest that the Government seem determined to throw away the technological advantage that we have over the remainder of the world?

Mr. Moore

I read the Miner, among other magazines, but, probably like the hon. Gentleman, I do not accept everything that I read as gospel. The technology of the process is crucial, and it is essential that we make the decision properly. Various liquefaction processes will continue throughout the world, but, in the first instance, they will relate to areas of cheap coal. We must find the right technological answers to ensure that the process, as it develops, has every chance of success.

Mr. Eadie

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. In view of the unsatisfactory nature of that reply, I beg to give notice that I shall seek to raise the matter on the Adjournment at the earliest opportunity.

Back to