§
' (1) Where, after the commencement of this section, a tenancy of a house is created by the grant of a lease at a premium and either—
§
(2) The bodies referred to in subsection (1) (a) above are—
§
(3) The conditions mentioned in subsection (1)(a) above are—
§
(4) The conditions mentioned in subsection (1)(b) above are—
§ (5) If, in any proceedings in which it falls to be determined whether a lease complies with the condition in subsection (3)(a) above, the question arises whether the consideration payable by the tenant on acquiring the freehold is reasonable, it is for the landlord to show that it is.
§ (6) In this section "registered housing association" means an association registered under section 13 of the 1974 Act.'.—[Mr. Wyn Roberts.]
§ Brought up, and read the First time.
97§ The Under-Secretary of State for Wales (Mr. Wyn Roberts)I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
The new clause is part and parcel of the Government's proposals for making shared ownership more practical and attractive. When the advantages of home ownership are so considerable, and when many people find the difficulty of bridging the financial gap between owning and renting so great, more must be done to create a half-way house between the two. A person could initially part own and part rent, and would later be able to take up the right to buy into full home ownership.
We want to encourage landlord authorities to go beyond the traditional 50–50 shared ownership scheme, under which the purchaser has to buy the equity of his property in two equal instalments. Additional flexibility is possible, if a landlord's shared ownership scheme contains an element of "staircasing", or of progressive purchase. Under such an arrangement, a shared owner could buy successive slices of his equity in, for example, 25 per cent. tranches. He would then move gradually towards exercising the option to acquire the freehold.
A shared ownership lease can come into conflict with the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. Under that Act, a lessee with a long lease of a house can enfranchise—purchase a freehold reversion to his property—under favourable terms once his rent falls below two-thirds of its rateable value, and after five years' residence—or three years if the House approves amendment No. 106. This can happen in a shared ownership scheme when successive slices of equity are bought and the part on which rent is payable correspondingly diminishes.
If the rent falls below two-thirds of the rateable value, the owner can buy the freehold reversion under the Leasehold Reform Act on terms that may be more favourable than allowed under the shared ownership scheme into which he had entered. It would not be in the spirit of shared ownership if a shared owner were to enter into a lease that provided for terms on which he could purchase the freehold reversion and if he were then to switch to enfranchisement under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. The clause will exclude from the operation of part I of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 shared 98 ownership leases that have been granted by local authorities and new towns.
We felt it necessary to deal with housing associations differently. Their shared ownership leases do not always contain an option to purchase the freehold. We do not wish to cause problems for interesting experimental schemes, such as community leasehold and leasehold for the elderly. The amendment provides a power to set out in regulations the main principles of those leases to be excluded.
The exemption is closely defined and tightly controlled. It is not a loophole through which public sector landlords—who are not granting shared ownership leases—will be able to evade the operation of the 1967 Act. In contrast, it will encourage the development of a wider range of shared ownership schemes. I commend the new clause to the House.
§ Question put and agreed to.
§ Clause read a Second time, and added to the Bill.