§ 11. Mr. John Evansasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department 1636 when he expects to announce the results of his review of civil defence provision.
§ Mr. BrittanWe hope to be able to do so after the Easter Recess.
§ Mr. EvansIn view of the Home Office's frequently expressed determination to protect civilians in the event of a nuclear holocaust, is it intended to instruct local authorities to start a crash programme in building nuclear shelters? If not, why not?
§ Mr. BrittanThat matter can be better dealt with at the conclusion of the review than during the course of it.
§ Mr. Allan StewartIs my hon. and learned Friend aware that many people are interested in providing their own nuclear shelters, despite there being no financial incentive and such shelters being subject to full VAT? Will he assure the House that that is being borne in mind in the current review?
§ Mr. BrittanI am aware that many people wish to provide their own shelters. The ways in which families can provide simple shelters at reasonable cost are under examination with a view to making advice on that subject available in due course.
§ Mr. CryerDoes the Minister accept that there is no civil defence whatsoever against a nuclear conflagration? Is he aware that the Secretary of State for Defence has said that in the worst circumstances only a few minutes' warning will be given? Is not the best defence to opt out of the nuclear weapons race?
§ Mr. BrittanI do not accept that for one moment. The best way to prevent nuclear conflagration is to be in a position to deter an aggressor. One must have a balanced view about civil defence. Of course there would be immense damage if there were a nuclear attack. That does not mean that nothing can be done to mitigate that damage if such a disaster were to occur.
§ Mr. Nicholas WintertonWill my hon. and learned Friend tell the House what funds are now available for nuclear fall-out shelters under the civil defence system? Will he indicate why it is taking so long for advice to be forthcoming on the specification of such nuclear shelters 1637 when people want to provide them for themselves?
Does he not agree that people are taking civil defence seriously, and regret the disruption that resulted from a previous Labour Administration?
§ Mr. BrittanPeople are taking civil defence seriously, and that is why my right hon. Friend instituted a review last year. The announcement of the review will come shortly. I am sure that my hon. Friend will wait until then. There is no money available at present for the purpose that my hon. Friend mentioned.
§ Dr. SummerskillMay we take it from the Minister's remarks that he does not intend to raise public expenditure on civil defence in real terms? Unless he does that, it will be extremely difficult to increase provision.
§ Mr. BrittanThe hon. Lady is entitled to her opinion and her speculation. I think that the House would wish to wait for a proper statement at the conclusion of the review.