§ 4. Mr. Whiteheadasked the Minister of Transport if he has now received the Cairncross report on the Channel tunnel; and if he will make a statement.
§ 6. Mr. Ron Lewisasked the Minister of Transport if he has now received the Cairncross report on the Channel tunnel; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. FowlerSir Alec Cairncross has given me his initial impression of the BRB scheme. Further work is in hand and I will make a statement as soon as possible.
§ Mr. WhiteheadHas the Minister gathered from this initial statement that a single-track tunnel of the type recommended would be a sound investment, 422 particularly as finance is available, both from the EEC and the money markets? Will he make a statement next Transport Question Time as we do not want waiting for Cairncross to become the parliament equivalent of waiting for Godot?
§ Mr. FowlerI take to heart the point that the hon. Member makes and I shall consider whether a statement will be made at the next Transport Question Time. The whole point is that we have asked Sir Alec Cairncross to have a continuing look at whether the project, as at present conceived, is financially viable. That is what Sir Alec will do and that is the matter on which I await his advice.
§ Mr. LewisIs the Minister aware that a decision in favour of the Channel tunnel would give a great morale boost to a quarter of a million railway men and women? Will he accept that a Channel tunnel will be a considerable asset to the nation's export investment and to tourism?
§ Mr. FowlerObviously there are great advantages, but I am sure the hon. Member will agree that, if we are to have a Channel tunnel, it is important to get the right Channel tunnel. We are at a very early stage in our deliberations. The Government are certainly not committed to a Channel tunnel, and I ask the hon. Member to await my further statement.
§ Mr. CostainWill the Minister make certain that the Cairncross report is available to the House before Transport Question Time so that we can ask intelligent questions about it?
§ Mr. FowlerThe purpose of what Sir Alec Cairncross is doing is to give personal advice to me as the Minister. His inquiry would not be considered to be a Royal Commission or anything of that kind. I shall wish to make a statement giving the maximum amount of advice to the House, on which the House can reach its own conclusions.
§ Mr. DalyellMay I raise a question that was raised at the last Transport Question Time about the steel-using aspects of the Channel tunnel? Has the Minister looked at this matter?
§ Mr. FowlerThis is one of the things that we shall continue to look at. I hope 423 that the hon. Member will await my further statement.
§ Mr. PrescottIs the Minister aware of the EEC documents on Community transport infrastructure projects, which was published in November? Is he aware that future rail projects do not include a Channel tunnel? Has he drawn this omission to the attention of the Council of Ministers and does he think that such a project is dependent on Community finances? Does "further work" mean another rail and road project?
§ Mr. FowlerThe short answer is that the infrastructure instrument is under discussion and has a long way to go. Clearly, European finance would be one of the points that we would have very much in mind. I hope that at some stage the Opposition Front Bench will make their position on the Channel tunnel unequivocably clear.