§ 12. Mr. John Evansasked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he has any plans to increase prescription charges.
§ Dr. VaughanThe prescription charge was increased from 70 pence to £1 per item on 1 December 1980. My right hon. Friend has no plans at present for any further increases.
§ Mr. EvansI am grateful for the last part of the Minister's answer. Is he aware that a considerable number of items being prescribed cost less per article than the prescripton charge? Will he consider giving a directive to chemists that, when that occurs, they should inform the customer, who could pay the price of the article and save the £1 prescription charge?
§ Dr. VaughanMay I suggest that we wait a little while to judge the effect of the new £1 charge and the effect that it has on the take-up of prescriptions? There are already changes in the pattern of prescribing.
§ Mr. ThompsonWhat is the proportion of those who are given prescriptions who pay the £1 charge?
§ Dr. VaughanThose who are exempted from prescription charges amount to 64 per cent. of those receiving prescriptions. A further 5 per cent. are on season ticket arrangements.
§ Mr. ParkWill the Minister confirm that the income from the sale of six-month and 12-month prepayment certificates was taken into account halfway through the financial year, resulting in a deduction of £10 million nationwide? Does he accept that that was not conveyed formally to area health authorities and that the authorities had to pick it up from an appendix to a financial report?
§ Dr. VaughanI do not accept the hon. Gentleman's implied criticism. There is always a delay between a change in the charge and the recovery of charges. Overall, the new £1 charge will raise an extra £30 million, which can only be of benefit to the National Health Service.
§ Mr. McCrindleWhat is my hon. Friend's reaction to the provocative posters appearing in chemists' premises under the heading "Tax on Health"?
§ Dr. VaughanI am glad that my hon. Friend raised that matter. I deplore the wording of the posters, which is misleading. The charge is not a tax. It is a reasonable contribution by a user, when he is able to afford it, to the cost of the National Health Sevice.
§ Mrs. DunwoodyIs it not true that pharmacists are reporting more and more cases of patients asking them to decide which items they do not need on a prescription? Is it not also true that there has been a disastrous and frightening drop in the number of prescriptions being issued—about 19 million down on the figure before the £1 increase? How does the Minister explain that?
§ Dr. VaughanThe hon. Lady is trying to put an alarmist side to the matter. Supposing that there is a small decrease in the number of prescriptions, we cannot have it both ways. We cannot ask people to take fewer drugs and then complain when they have fewer prescriptions.