HC Deb 20 July 1979 vol 970 c2181
Miss Jo Richardson (Barking)

I beg to present a petition, signed by a large number of my constituents and others:

To the Honourable the Commons of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in Parliament assembled.

The humble petition from we the undersigned sheweth:

  1. 1. That Electro-Convulsive Treatment (ECT) is experimental and poses substantial dangers to patients receiving it.
  2. 2. That Holland has recently put a total ban on this form of treatment.
  3. 3. That California, Florida, Connecticut, Missouri, Ontario (Canada) and Lower Saxony (Germany) have put severe restrictions on the use of ECT.
  4. 4. That documents obtained under the American Freedom of Information Act prove that psychiatrists have had the knowledge that ECT is harmful since 1951.
  5. 5. That this knowledge has been actively suppressed and denied. As a result ECT is one of the most prevalent treatments in British Institutions today.
  6. 6. That the harmful side effects commonly known to the profession range from a long-term memory loss and migraine headaches to epilepsy and even death.
  7. 7. That the Royal College of Psychiatists' investigation into ECT, in the light of their refusal to accept evidence presented to them, is biased and a waste of £55,000 of public funds.
  8. 8. That new legislation to safeguard mental patients' rights should be introduced by the new Government as soon as possible.
  9. 9. That such legislation must grant patients the absolute right to refuse ECT together with other controversial and hazardous treatments, after a full explanation of the nature of the treatment, its hazards and side effects have been explained.
Wherefore your petitioners humbly pray that this honourable House will bring about reforms in the laws governing the mental health field to restore human rights to psychiatric patients.

And your petitioners, as in duty bound, will ever pray.

To lie upon the Table.

Back to