§ 14. Mr. Hooleyasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will arrange for a sample census in each region of England and Wales to ascertain how many daughters of parents of British nationality were born outside the United Kingdom.
§ Mr. RaisonNo, Sir.
§ Mr. HooleyIs the Minister aware that many British Service men whose children were born abroad because they were serving abroad, other public servants whose children were born abroad because their service took them abroad, and 1521 many other catgories of people, are deeply dismayed and resentful at the immigration rules proposed by the Government? Will he take steps to cut out from those rules the sexist and racist discriminatory elements in them?
§ Mr. RaisonAs was indicated in the debate on 4 December, the Government have agreed to a change in their proposals for girls born overseas to parents who happened to be abroad at the time. They will be able to bring in their husbands or fiances provided that the main purpose of the marriage is not the immigration of the husband, and provided that the woman is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies, one of whose parents was born here. In other cases we shall, of course, consider the circumstances very carefully and contemplate whether to exercise discretion.
§ Mr. BudgenDoes not my hon. Friend agree that more generous support should be given to the idea of the hon. Member for Sheffield, Heeley (Mr. Hooley) who is trying to discover the number of people involved? Is not that exactly the theory behind the register to which the Tory Party is committed in its election manifesto?
§ Mr. RaisonMy hon. Friend is raising another question.
§ Mr. Alexander W. LyonHas the Minister looked at the figures that were produced from the 1971 census, which indicate that about half of the Indian girls in this country of marriageable age were born here? If the Minister went over to the only sensible defence of this proposal—I doubt whether even that is sensible—and if he were to restrict entry to husbands of patrial wives, would not he actually achieve all that he desires?
§ Mr. RaisonI have, of course, looked at the figures given in the 1971 census. I accept that point. At that time there were in Great Britain about 267,000 females, 141,000 of them single, who had been born outside the United Kingdom, but one or both of whose parents had been born in the British Isles. Not all of them will necessarily be citizens of the United Kingdom and Colonies.
§ Mr. ChapmanWith respect, will my hon. Friend consider the answer that he gave to the hon. Member for Sheffield, 1522 Heeley (Mr. Hooley)? Is not this the kind of question that it would be relevant and useful to answer in the decennial census in 1981?
§ Mr. RaisonThere are some difficulties about the proposed questions covering the origin of people to be tested by the 1980–81 census. We are thinking about that very carefully.
§ Mr. George CunninghamWhen does the Minister expect the new revised rules to be put before the House? In view of the extreme criticisms mounted from all quarters in the House on some aspects of the draft rules in the White Paper, may we have an assurance that the text of the revised regulations will be available to the House before the rules are tabled?
§ Mr. RaisonNo, Sir.