§ Q2. Mr. Crawfordasked the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Thursday 20th July.
§ The Prime MinisterThis morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet. In addition to my duties in this House, I shall be holding meetings with ministerial colleagues and others.
§ Mr. CrawfordNow that the Scotland Bill is going through its penultimate stages, may I ask the Prime Minister to take time off today to give us a precise date for the referendum on the Scottish Assembly? Is he aware that the SNP will press him all the way on this matter?
§ The Prime MinisterWas the hon. Gentleman saying that he would press the Government or support the Government? I did not quite catch it.
§ Mr. CrawfordCan I tell the Prime Minister, Mr. Speaker—
§ Mr. SpeakerOrder. Will the hon. Gentleman quickly put his supplementary question again so that the Prime Minister can hear it?
§ Mr. CrawfordWill the Prime Minister give a precise date for the holding of a referendum on the Scottish Assembly?
§ The Prime MinisterI was hoping to hear from the hon. Gentleman that I was to get some support from the Scottish National Party, which would be a change considering the number of times that it has voted with the Conservatives with the aim of utterly destroying the Bill which would give Scotland an Assembly. Of course we shall give urgent consideration to fixing the date of a referendum as soon as the Bill is through. Orders will have to be laid, as I understand it, which will need the consent of both Houses before we can move to that stage.
§ Mr. NobleWill my right hon. Friend discuss with the Secretary of State for Education and Science and with officials of the education authority in Kingston-upon-Thames the interesting referendum conducted among parents by that education authority about secondary education 782 which showed a desire for reorganisation to a non-selective system? Will he find ways and means of ensuring that these democratically expressed wishes are carried into effect as soon as possible?
§ The Prime MinisterI am interested to hear of that conclusion. It bears out the policy of the Government—namely, that the people of this country, and parents in particular, want a system of comprehensive education. I am glad to say that since we assumed office the number of children enjoying comprehensive education has increased from 60 to 80 per cent. At the same time, the number of pupils per class has declined and the number of school teachers has increased.
§ Mr. Maxwell-HyslopAs it is the Government's policy to encourage early retirement, and as the Prime Minister has now passed retirement age by two years, may I ask whether his engagements for today include a visit to the Palace to inform Her Majesty when he intends to retire and whether he will suggest as his replacement his ageing Leader of the House or the electrifying Secretary of State for Energy?
§ Mr. SpeakerOrder. Perhaps I ought to declare an interest here.
§ Mr. McNamaraIn view of my right hon. Friend's well-known concern for the low-paid and his earlier statement about helping the weak, may I ask whether he will be having any discussions today with the Lord Privy Seal or the Minister of State, Civil Service Department about the industrial civil servant, who is very lowly paid? Is he aware that a married man with two children—an employee of the Government on the lower band—can qualify for family income supplement? Is this not a matter which the Government should be considering?
§ The Prime MinisterThe Lord Privy Seal is ready, through his officials or, indeed, directly, to meet the unions concerned on these matters, but there must be agreement this year to accept the guidelines that the Government laid down 12 months ago in relation to pay increases. Any rearrangement that can be made within that level can, of course, be agreed, but we cannot agree to exceptions. We have fought too hard a battle to give way at this stage.
§ Q3. Mr. Gordon Wilsonasked the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Thursday 20th July.
§ The Prime MinisterI refer the hon. Member to the reply which I have just given to the hon. Member for Perth and East Perthshire (Mr. Crawford).
§ Mr. WilsonWill the Prime Minister take more time today to reconsider the answer he gave just now in relation to the referendum? It is quite obvious that the Government have not made up their minds and are backsliding. Will he kindly give the House the date of the referendum for which the Scottish people are waiting?
§ The Prime MinisterIt is a very odd form of backsliding to have to introduce a guillotine and to keep the House sitting late at night in order to get the Bill so that the people of Scotland can take their own decision.
§ Mrs. Winifred EwingThat is not an answer.
§ Mr. BuchanIn considering the referendum which the SNP is so keen about will the Prime Minister consider including a question asking whether the Scottish people would like the devaluation of the green pound on the lines suggested by the SNP this afternoon, which would mean another 75p on the cost of the family shopping basket by the end of the year?
§ The Prime MinisterI am sure that that question, if put, would get a resounding "No" from the canny and thrifty Scots. That is why the SNP is losing ground so fast nowadays.
§ Q4. Mr. Wyn Robertsasked the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for 20th July.
§ The Prime MinisterI refer the hon. Member to the reply which I gave earlier today to the hon. Member for Perth and East Perthshire (Mr. Crawford).
§ Mr. RobertsWhen the Prime Minister was talking about the estimated 1.7 million unemployed next year, he said that the figure had been revised downwards twice. Could he now say what, in the Government's opinion, is the latest expected unemployment figure for next 784 year? Could he give as free an assurance as he has given about the rate of inflation about the expected rate of unemployment, and could he say how dependent that unemployment figure is on a 5 per cent. rate of wage increases in phase 4?
§ The Prime MinisterI cannot give the answers to all those questions, but I can tell the hon. Gentleman that the revised assumptions, which are, I understand, technically different from forecasts, were published in May of this year, so I suppose the Opposition will have seen them by now. As to whether the assumptions are dependable, that is a fact on which no one can comment, because—
§ Mr. TebbitGive us the numbers.
§ The Prime MinisterThe hon. Gentleman did not ask the supplementary question—a number of differing factors make up the level of unemployment, as the hon. Member for Conway (Mr. Roberts) knows. If, for example, world trade improves—as I trust it will, following our discussions at Bonn last weekend—that in itself will have a favourable influence, and there are other matters of this sort.
§ Mr. NewensHas my right hon. Friend given any further thought to the deplorable sentences imposed on Soviet dissidents? Does he not agree that it would, even in these circumstances, be totally wrong for us to lessen our efforts to achieve detente? Would it not also be desirable that we should be far more consistent in our denunciation of the abuses of human rights in places like Iran, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia, about which so many right hon. and hon. Gentlemen are silent?
§ The Prime MinisterThe Government and the Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary made their views known to the Soviet Government about the sentences that have been passed. I agree with my hon. Friend that it is necessary, in the interests of world peace, to pursue the prospects of getting agreements both on a comprehensive test ban treaty and on strategic arms limitation talks. Nor do I rule out, as some seem to do, direct contacts between Soviet citizens and organisations and our own citizens and organisations. I believe it is valuable, provided that we make clear to Soviet organisations what our position is, as I assume 785 the right hon. Lady the Leader of the Opposition did yesterday when she met the Soviet Ambassador. If she was not contaminated, I do not believe anybody else need be.
§ Mr. Ian LloydSince the Prime Minister may be presumed to be interested in the advance warnings which are available of the sort of catastrophe which arise from advanced forms of Socialism, is there any possibility of his having an early conversation with his opposite number, the Prime Minister of Sweden, to discuss with him the appalling financial consequences for that Government of the present attempts to salvage the shipbuilding industry?
§ The Prime MinisterAs far as I can remember, the Swedish shipbuilding industry prospered when there was a Socialist Government and has come to grief now that there is a Conservative Government. I think the same would be true in this country.