PUBLIC LENDING RIGHT BILL [Lords] (Hansard, 25 May 1976)

HC Deb 25 May 1976 vol 912 cc306-7 306

§ Order for Second Reading read.

§ Motion made, That the Public Lending Right Bill [Lords] be referred to a Second Reading Committee.—[Mr. John Ellis.]

§ Mr. Speaker
The Question is—

Hon. Members
Object.

§ Mr. Speaker
Objection taken. I call the Prime Minister to move the Adjournment motion.

Several Hon.Members
rose—

§ Mr. Speaker
Order. We have passed beyond the motion on the Public Lending Right Bill. We are on the next motion.

§ Mr. George Cunningham
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. My understanding is that when a motion is made that a Bill be referred to a Second Reading Committee, rather than being taken on the Floor of the House, it is necessary for Members objecting to that motion to stand in a number not fewer than 20. [HON. MEMBERS: "We did."] It is very difficult to ascertain, over a second or two, whether the number 20 has been exceeded, but my genuine guess would be that it was approaching 20 but was fewer than 20.

§ Mr. Speaker
The hon. Gentleman is correct when he says that there must be no fewer than 20 Members who rise in their place. My impression was that 20 Members had risen. However, I am liable to Celtic exaggeration, and I am prepared to put the Question. The Question is, That the Public Lending Right Bill [Lords] be referred to a Second Reading Committee. Not less than 20 Members having risen in their places and signified their objection thereto, Mr. SPEAKER declared that the Noes had it, pursuant to Standing Order No. 66 (Second Reading Committees).

§ Mr. Henderson
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. Would it not be helpful in these circumstances to hold a secret ballot, as the Conservatives insisted on in relation to trade union elections and which they so signally failed to carry out at their recent conference in Scotland?

307

§ Mr. Peyton
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. In circumstances such as these, when 20 hon. Members rise and you then give a ruling, I wonder whether it is proper, wise or sensible, if then objection is taken by other quarters of the House, that we then have to go back to the matter. Quite plainly, there would have to be some time limit during which it would be possible to go back and plough the ground over again. I rather hope, Mr. Speaker, that you will look very much askance at the practice of asking you to do it again, because this could land us in great difficulties.

§ Mr. Speaker
The right hon. Gentleman is quite correct. I shall learn that lesson as from now.