§
Lords Amendment: No. 2, in page 3, line 7, leave out subsection (2) and insert:
(2) Where—
the owner shall offer to extend the term of any agreement entered into in pursuance of a duty imposed on him by section 1 of this Act for a period which expires on whichever of the following dates first occurs:—
§ Mr. Tom KingI beg to move, That this House doth agree with the Lords in the said amendment.
This is a technical correction or improvement to the Bill. There was 966 always the problem in this area of granting an agreement for five years and the query whether the owner had title or the the ability to make such a grant. The ownership or licence for a site can be affected by planning permission. If the permission is not for five years, there is a problem. This amendment clarifies the position. If somebody who is entitled to offer a shorter term commensurate with a planning agreement or licence has the period extended, it is right that the person who has received a shorter agreement, by virtue of the fact that the owner was not then in a position to give him his full entitlement, should be entitled subsequently to receive the full period if the owner is in a position to give it. I fully support the amendment.
§ Question put and agreed to.