§ 15. Mr. Hannamasked the Secretary of State for Education and Science what recent steps he has taken to ensure the survival of theatre in the United Kingdom.
§ Mr. Hugh JenkinsThe survival of the theatre in the United Kingdom is the concern of many different organisations and individuals, including the Arts Council, local authorities and private promoters. I am sure that the supplementary estimate of £2.3 million, if approved, will help the Arts Council to meet the needs of the subsidised theatre as well as its other clients.
§ Mr. HannamWill the hon. Gentleman recognise that these last-minute grant announcements are causing a near breakdown in the living theatre where plans are having to be made now for tours next year? What type of grant will be made by the Government for the coming year is not known, so will the hon. Gentleman consider a triennial system so that the theatres' plans can be formalised and agreed?
§ Mr. JenkinsThe Arts Council, like everybody else, cannot escape entirely from the effects of inflation. That is why 1157 the Government's plans for getting inflation under control are as important in the arts as anywhere else. It is useless to have a triennial system in an inflationary situation. The best way of proceeding is to meet the Arts Council's needs as best we can at the time. A triennial situation with forewarning is desirable and we shall return to it as soon as we can, but controlling inflation is the first necessity before returning to such a system.
§ Mr. FlanneryIs my hon. Friend aware that many people are more worried about the continued survival of the United Kingdom within the Common Market than about the survival of the theatre? But is he also aware that we should like a great deal more money to be given to the theatre? Does he agree that it ill becomes Opposition Members, who are constantly asking for cuts in expenditure, to ask for more money to be given to an organisation, even though we agree that it needs more money?
§ Mr. JenkinsI think that my hon. Friend will agree that I have enough to do to ensure the survival of the theatre without taking on the survival of the United Kingdom as a whole.
§ Mr. CormackWhat representations has the hon. Gentleman made to Treasury Ministers about the removal of VAT from the theatre? Does he realise that this, above all, would help to create a prospect of certainty for the theatre?
§ Mr. JenkinsQuestions about VAT are for my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer, but within the grant given to the Arts Council an amount has been allowed for the replacement of the VAT it has to pay.
§ Mr. Robert CookeIs the hon. Gentleman aware that the subsidised theatre could learn a good deal from the commercial sector, particularly about making economic use of resources? Will he do his best to bring the two together?
§ Mr. JenkinsThe relationship between the subsidised and the commercial theatre has never been better.