§ Strike out words in square brackets if inapplicable.
§ Note 1
§ The improvement must be one made by the execution of works amounting to the structural alteration or extension of the premises or a structural addition thereto, e.g. the erection of a garage in the grounds.
§ Note 2
§ If the amount of the reduction is agreed in writing between the landlord and the tenant, the amount of the reduced rateable value as so agreed will be substituted for the purposes of the Leasehold Reform Act, 1967, for the rateable value on 1st April 1973.
§ Note 3
§ If the amount of the reduction is not agreed in writing between the landlord and the tenant, the Valuation Officer will have to decide whether the improvement has affected the rateable value of the premises, and if so, what that value would have been had the improvement not been made. The name and address of the Valuation Officer can be obtained from the local authority. Before, however, an application is made to the Valuation Officer, the landlord and the tenant must try to agree in writing on the items mentioned at (a) to (d) of this paragraph, or such of those items as are material. If at the end of a period of six weeks after the service of this notice any of these items have not been agreed, the tenant may, within a further six weeks or such longer time as the court may allow, apply to the county court to settle the matter.
§ If it has either been agreed or determined by the county court that there has been an improvement of the kind described in Note 1 involving specified works, and that the improve 1300 ment was carried out by the tenant or a previous tenant, or that the tenant or a previous tenant contributed to its cost, and in the latter case what proportion the contribution bears to the whole cost of the works, then, if within a period of two weeks after the agreement or determination of the county court the landlord and the tenant have still not agreed in writing whether any or what reduction is to be made, the tenant has a further four weeks in which to make are application in the statutory form to the Valuation Officer for a certificate as to whether or not the improvement has affected the rateable value, and if so, the amount by which that value would have been less if the improvement had not been made.
§ FORM
§ Application by Tenant to Valuation Officer for Certificate as to Reduction for the purposes of the Leasehold Reform Act, 1967, in the Rateable Value of premises on account of Tenants' Improvements.
§ Date……………
§ To the Valuation Officer.
§ 1. I am the tenant of and my landlord is of
§ 2. It has been (agreed in writing between me and my landlord) (determined by the county court) that the improvement(s) specified in the First Schedule hereto (is an improvement) (are improvements) to which Schedule Seven to the Leasehold Reform Act, 1967, applies, and that or a previous tenant under the tenancy made the improvement(s) or contributed to (its) (their) cost, and that the works specified in the Second Schedule hereto were involved in the improvement(s).
§ 3. It has not been agreed between me and my landlord whether any or what reduction is to be made under said Schedule Seven in the rateable value of the premises for the purposes of the Leasehold Reform Act, 1967, and I hereby make application to you for a certificate under paragraph 3(2) of the said Schedule Seven (Note 4).
§ Signature of Tenant…………