§ 7. Mr. William Hamiltonasked the Secretary of State for Defence what plans have been made for a joint Anglo-French nuclear deterrent.
§ Mr. Ian GilmourNone.
§ Mr. HamiltonWill the Minister give an assurance that there has been and will be no discussion of this matter, as it is accepted policy on both sides of the House that our defences should be based on NATO and not on bilateral arrangements of this kind and it would be very much regretted if such an agreement were sought with the French?
§ Mr. GilmourAs the hon. Gentleman is well aware, my right hon. Friend the 1024 Prime Minister and many other members of the Government have repeated in the House several times that while such nuclear collaboration may be desirable in the long term there have been no discussions about it in the near term. I entirely agree with the hon. Member that NATO is an important factor.
§ Mr. WallIs my right hon. Friend aware that the Committee of Nine recently reported to the North Atlantic Assembly advocating such a force as the start of an integrated European defence force? Will he keep these two questions carefully under consideration?
§ Mr. GilmourI am aware that the Western European Union committee said that. My hon. Friend the Member for Aldershot (Mr. Critchley) was the rapporteur of that extremely interesting report. But it does not affect our view that this is a matter for the long term and not for the immediate present.
§ Mr. PeartIs the Secretary of State aware that the Prime Minister recently gave an interview to a French newspaper defending his original concept which he declared in a Godkin lecture many years ago? Is he also aware that any attempt to create outside NATO an Anglo-French nuclear force would be detrimental to detente and would harm relations with countries like West Germany?
§ Mr. GilmourI am well aware of the interview which my right hon. Friend gave to Figaro, but he did not say anything different from what he has said in the House or from what I have told the House this afternoon.
§ Mr. WaltersOn the assumption that in the long term it would be useful to have a European defence system that is better integrated than it is at present, would it not be sensible to continue discussions with the French on the possibility of a joint deterrent force which eventually would become the European deterrent force?
§ Mr. GilmourI must reiterate that, although there are obviously long-term attractions in the idea put forward by my right hon. Friend in the Godkin lectures, there are considerable difficulties, and I do not think that we would wish to go on any further in discussion of this matter at present.
§ Mr. PagetIs it not a fact that we could not form a joint nuclear force with the French without breaking our agreements as to confidentiality with the Americans?
§ Mr. GilmourIt is perfectly true that that is one of the factors to be taken into account.