§ 22. Mr. Fowlerasked the Minister of Posts and Telecommunications whether he is now in a position to announce a decision on the introduction of an independent broadcasting council.
§ Sir J. EdenAs I said in reply to my hon. Friend on 28th June, the idea might better be considered in the context of a general review.—[Vol. 839. c. 337.]
§ Mr. FowlerWould my right hon. Friend accept that the aim of a broadcasting council is to provide not some kind of back-door censorship but a court of appeal for the public? Surely the time has come when the public's interest in broadcasting should be firmly recognised by the Government?
§ Sir J. EdenI take note of what my hon. Friend has said, which I find 991 extremely helpful in defining what should be the purpose of a broadcasting council.
§ Mr. KaufmanWould not the right hon. Gentleman agree that a council of this kind is necessary to deal with the scandalous practices of tobacco companies, such as Benson and Hedges, which are getting round the ban on cigarette advertising by advertising cigars and other products with the same slogans as they use for advertising cigarettes? Is this not a scandal?
§ Sir J. EdenThe hon. Gentleman's supplementary question relates to the last Question. We have moved on since then.
§ Mr. Stratton MillsIn the light of the experience of the BBC's commission, which looks at a certain limited type of appeal, would my right hon. Friend engage in talks with the BBC to see whether, in the light of experience, the terms of reference could be extended?
§ Sir J. EdenI am afraid that I did not hear what my hon. Friend said.
§ Mr. William PriceIf the right hon. Gentleman sets up a broadcasting council, will he ensure that it is more useful than the Press Council?
§ Sir J. EdenObviously one would wish to take advantage of experience gained in any other quarter.