§ Mr. SpeakerYesterday the hon. Member for Fife, West (Mr. William Hamilton) drew attention to an article in the Spectator, which mentioned several hon. Members of the House and made certain allegations, or inferences about them. It is not for me to say whether the article reflected on any Member in such a way as to constitute a violation of the rights and privileges of the House. I have to say whether, in my view, the hon. Member's complaint should be given precedence as a privilege issue over today's business. It is my opinion that it should not.
§ Mr. William HamiltonMay I ask a question for my own guidance, Mr. Speaker? Would I be in order in commenting on a letter of advice I received from the Clerk of the Journals on this matter? If not, may I ask you this question, Mr. Speaker? I understand that one of the reasons why you have ruled as you have ruled is that the activities of the Member concerned were activities outside the House and not inside. But the fact—
§ Mr. SpeakerOrder. I really do not think that my Ruling is debatable or questionable. If the hon. Member has any representation to make to me about any advice he was given, I will see him privately and discuss it with him. I cannot allow any public discussion of a Ruling on privilege.
§ Mr. HamiltonWe shall have a cup of tea over it.
§ Mr. SpeakerThe hon. Member must not take too much for granted. Mr. Arthur Lewis.