§ 2. Mr. Hugh Jenkinsasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will now seek to introduce a ceiling on the size of mortgages which are eligible for tax relief.
§ Mr. Patrick JenkinI have nothing to add to the last part of my right hon. Friend the Chief Secretary's answer to the hon. Member for Salford, East (Mr. Frank Allaun) on 23rd November.—[Vol.826, c. 1114–5.]
§ Mr. Hugh JenkinsDo not the Government realise that there is no restriction on the number of houses on which mortgage interest relief can be given and that there are grounds for believing that some persons claim mortgage relief on more than one house? Will he not place a restriction on the wealthiest people, if he is requiring the poor to be subjected to a means test?
§ Mr. JenkinThere has been no change in mortgage interest relief since the position left behind by the Labour Government.
§ Mr. McCrindleIs my hon. Friend aware that to accept this proposal would mean a constant change in the ceiling above which tax relief is disallowed, if for no other reason than that house prices continue to rise? Would it not be better to encourage home ownership by regarding tax relief as a recompense for the cost of maintaining the property?
§ Mr. JenkinOne of the main social justifications for tax relief, as my hon. Friend suggests, is the encouragement of home ownership, a policy which I should have thought was supported by both sides of the House.
§ Mr. FreesonIn view of the Minister's observations, is there not a case for establishing a ceiling for mortgages on which tax relief is allowed, so as to ease the position for first mortgage applicants and newly married couples who seek to become owner-occupiers of moderately priced houses?
§ Mr. JenkinAs I am sure the hon. Gentleman knows, the option mortgage scheme, which is intended to help the categories of people to whom he refers, has been improved by the present Government. The Labour Party should recognise that the value of reliefs must be related to the marginal top rate of tax of the tax payers, and if the rates of tax are high, the rates of relief will be correspondingly high.