§ 23. Mr. Duffyasked the Secretary of State for the Environment if the Tinsley Viaduct has now been treated for aspergillus fumigatus.
§ Mr. Eldon GriffithsA contract for the removal of this fungus is about to be let.
§ Mr. HefferIt should have been sprayed on that lot on the Government benches.
§ Mr. DuffyBearing in mind that this matter was debated in the House six months ago, is not this an unwarrantable delay? May I ask the hon. Gentleman three questions? Are these fungus spores airborne? Do they present a health hazard not only to maintenance personnel but to others living in the vicinity? Is the hon. Gentleman satisfied that there will not be a recurrence?
§ Mr. GriffithsWithout notice, I cannot say whether the fungus is airborne. I can tell the hon. Gentleman that the contract will bring about a procedure for scraping, brushing and vacuuming the facility in question. There is no health hazard in the vicinity.
§ Mr. HardyThe Minister seemed to dismiss lightly the question whether this fungus was injurious. Does he realise that my constituency is very close to the 1322 Tinsley Viaduct? Can we have a categorical assurance that there is no health hazard to the South Yorkshire area surrounding the Tinsley Viaduct?
§ Mr. GriffithsOn that count, Yes, Sir.