HC Deb 22 July 1971 vol 821 cc1648-9
2. Mr. Whitehead

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will now announce the result of his inquiry into the new evidence relating to the trial and execution of James Hanratty ; and if he will make a statement.

15. Mr. Willey

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will make a further statement on the James Hanratty case.

The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Mr. Reginald Maudling)

In response to my invitation, Mr. Paul Foot has sent me a full and detailed letter, and I am giving the closest consideration to the points he makes. But I cannot make any further comment as I understand that a writ has now been issued in the High Court in respect of certain published material relevant to this matter.

Mr. Whitehead

Does the Home Secretary understand that we accept the need for the most careful consideration of this case and that we would not wish to rush it in any way? May I ask three questions? First, has the right hon. Gentleman seen Mr. Paul Foot, the author of this memorandum which has been sent to him? I understand that he has not. Secondly, has he in any way acquired further evidence from Mrs. Lanz whose statement about the case came to light after Mr. Foot had prepared the original memorandum, although she is mentioned in it? Thirdly, will the right hon. Gentleman make a statement whenever the result of his deliberations can be announced?

Mr. Maudling

I have had this letter from Mr. Foot which I am having examined, and I will reply when the examination is concluded. If it is useful to have a meeting I will arrange one. I do not think it would be useful to comment further because I have not seen the terms of the writ which has been referred to.

Mr. Willey

While also appreciating the conscientious consideration that the Home Secretary has given to this matter and appreciating his present particular difficulties, nevertheless, may I ask him to give serious consideration to this aspect of the case—that there is, rightly or wrongly, considerable public disquiet and that probably the only way in which we can allay that disquiet is by having a public and open inquiry?

Mr. Maudling

I agree that there is a great deal of public interest in the matter, but my responsibility will be the same however great or small the interest.

Mr. Callaghan

Would the issue of the High Court writ prevent the Home Secretary from reaching his conclusions, or can he go ahead and appoint an inquiry or tell us what his own views are at the end of the day despite this civil action?

Mr. Maudling

I can certainly go ahead and I shall continue my investigation, but until I have seen the terms of the writ or taken legal advice I cannot say to what extent I am inhibited in taking action.