§ 28. Mr. Sheldonasked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make a further statement on the Channel Tunnel.
§ Mr. PeytonNo, Sir.
§ Mr. SheldonIn a previous exchange the Under-Secretary of State referred to information showing that a road link would be uneconomic. Will the Minister publish this information?
§ Mr. PeytonI will certainly look at the point. Is the hon. Gentleman referring to a road tunnel?
§ Mr. SheldonA road link.
§ Mr. PeytonI will certainly look at the point, and I shall be grateful if the hon. Gentleman will explain more fully what he means.
§ Mr. SheldonThe previous exchange referred to any form of road link across the Channel; and, although the Minister has many times said that he would provide information if requested, he has failed to do so in reply to a number of Questions I have put to him. Does that view apply to this matter also?
§ Mr. PeytonThe hon. Gentleman is an habitual questioner. I do my best to provide exhaustive and constructive answers. I am sorry that I have disappointed him. I am not quite sure lo what he is referring. If he is referring to the possibility of a road tunnel, I am obliged to tell him that my advice is that ventilation problems, apart from anything else, would be an almost insurmountable barrier.