§ 29. Mr. Maclennanasked the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth 31 Affairs why Her Majesty's Government have not yet submitted a brief amicus curiae to the International Court of Justice in the proceedings to obtain an advisory opinion on the legal consequences for States of the continued presence of South Africa in Namibia.
§ Sir Alec Douglas-HomeWe did not submit a statement to the International Court on behalf of the United Kingdom because we did not think it necessary to add to the material already before the Court.
§ Mr. MaclennanAs Her Majesty's Government intend to conceal their views on the legal consequences of South Africa's occupation of Namibia, may I ask the right hon. Gentleman to say what importance the Government attach to the present advisory proceedings which are before the Court?
§ Sir Alec Douglas-HomeWe are not concealing our views. We want to hear the views of the judges.
§ Mr. Alexander W. LyonCannot we at least have a legal opinion from the Attorney-General setting out the view of Her Majesty's Government of the application that is before the International Court?
§ Sir Alec Douglas-HomeNo, Sir. [Interruption.] I do not think it is necessary. It is better for us to wait for the view of the judges and hear what they have to say before we make any further statement.